Vivo X200 FE vs OnePlus 13s

78 out of 100
Vivo X200 FE
VS
83 out of 100
OnePlus 13s

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X200 FE (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on June 23, 2025, against the OnePlus 13s, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 FE
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the OnePlus 13s
  • 41% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3013K versus 2140K)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
  • 27% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2802 and 2209 points

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X200 FE and OnePlus 13s crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
31.7
(Mediocre)
Value Index
45.8
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.31 inches 6.32 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1216 x 2640 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.54:9
PPI 461 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 5000 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz -
Screen protection Schott Xensation Core Crystal Shield Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 90.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% -
PWM 360 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
1766 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 150.8 mm (5.94 inches) 150.8 mm (5.94 inches)
Width 71.8 mm (2.83 inches) 71.7 mm (2.82 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 8.2 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 186 g (6.56 oz) 185 g (6.53 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP65
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Blue, Pink, Yellow Black, Green, Pink
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.99/5) -
Drop resistance Good (C) · 100 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
90.3%
90.6%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X200 FE and OnePlus 13s
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 3400 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 790 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X200 FE and OnePlus 13s
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2209
2802
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
7239
8830
Compute Score (GPU)
15299
24802
Compute Score (GPU) 15299 24802
Single-core score 2209 2802
Multi-core score 7239 8830
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2140421
3013469
CPU 662181 868542
GPU 664075 1107935
Memory 295511 370216
UX 518654 666776
Total score 2140421 3013469
Samples [10 tests] [6 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1561
2366
Stability 65% 80%
Graphics test 12 FPS 18 FPS
Graphics score 1561 2366
3DMark Solar Bay
6745
10993
Graphics test 26 FPS 42 FPS
Section 1 28 FPS 48 FPS
Section 2 26 FPS 42 FPS
Section 3 22 FPS 36 FPS
Graphics score 6745 10993
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
13962
15357
Web score 13991 15017
Video editing 5556 6717
Photo editing 26454 27420
Data manipulation 12139 13670
Writing score 21943 23240

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X200 FE
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-11 (Viva plesenь)AnTuTu2148340
📘 2026-08-31 (Jojorabbit95)AnTuTu2306009
📘 2026-06-14 (ShaSha)AnTuTu2235448
📘 2026-06-04 (Pranav)AnTuTu2140421
📘 2026-05-17 (Sanjeep halder)AnTuTu1793939
OnePlus 13s
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-24 (Vasy1163)AnTuTu2915150
📘 2026-08-19 (Dhruv)GeekBench GPU25056
📘 2026-07-28 (Vanskyver)Battery lifeSOT 4:42 / 20:00
📘 2026-07-15 (Hamza)AnTuTu3013469
📘 2026-03-04 (Jaini)GeekBench GPU24802

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock - 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM Funtouch 15 OxygenOS 16
OS size 57 GB -
OS updates 3 years 4 years
Security updates 4 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 6500 mAh 5850 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging - Yes
Fast charging Yes (48% in 30 min) Yes (75% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:58 hr 0:51 hr
Battery cycles 800 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 11:34 hr -
Watching video 15:00 hr -
Gaming 07:21 hr -
Standby 108 hr -
General battery life
25:14 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 2x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 480 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 119° -
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.8
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Sony IMX921 Sony LYT-700
Sensor size 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.0
Focal length 70 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX882 Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/2.75" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP -
Aperture f/2.2 -
Focal length 15 mm -
Sensor OmniVision OV08D10 -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.
Focal length 20 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KKD1 CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
90.1 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced June 2025 June 2025
Release date July 2025 June 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $650 $650
Successor - Vivo X300 FE -
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance, gaming, and software are more important to you, then choose the OnePlus 13s. But if the sound is more of a priority – go for the Vivo X200 FE.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
116 (49.6%)
118 (50.4%)
Total votes: 234

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
nimda? March 20, 2026 at 10:18 AM
very biased comparison the cameras are way better in the x200 fe doesnt even make sense how u judged it
0 Reply
Avatar
CORTEX July 25, 2025 at 03:23 PM
This review comparision is completely biased towards 13s. Lol cameras are far better in x200fe. And battery is also better in x200fe only thing 13s has going for it is oxygenOS and 8 elite
+24 Reply