Home > Smartphone comparison > X200 FE vs GT 7 (Global) – which one to choose?

Vivo X200 FE vs Realme GT 7 (Global)

78 out of 100
Vivo X200 FE
VS
83 out of 100
Realme GT 7 (Global)
Vivo X200 FE
Realme GT 7 (Global)

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X200 FE (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on June 23, 2025, against the Realme GT 7 (Global), which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400e and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 FE
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Delivers 21% higher peak brightness (1750 against 1447 nits)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • Weighs 20 grams less
Reasons to consider the Realme GT 7 (Global)
  • Shows 36% longer battery life (34:22 vs 25:14 hours)
  • Has a 0.47 inch larger screen size
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 90W)
  • 17% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2505K versus 2140K)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X200 FE and Realme GT 7 (Global) crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
31.7
(Mediocre)
Value Index
75.6
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
X200 FE
vs
GT 7 (Global)

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.31 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1264 x 2780 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 461 ppi 450 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 5000 nits 6000 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Schott Xensation Core Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 89.8%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% -
PWM 360 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
GT 7 (Global)
6.78β€³ (20:9 ratio) = 17.2 in2
X200 FE
6.31β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~13% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
X200 FE +21%
1750 nits
GT 7 (Global)
1447 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 150.8 mm (5.94 inches) 162.42 mm (6.39 inches)
Width 71.8 mm (2.83 inches) 76.13 mm (3 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 8.3 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 186 g (6.56 oz) 206 g (7.27 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Metal Plastic
Colors Black, Blue, Pink, Yellow Black, Blue, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.99/5) Good (3.4/5)
Drop resistance Good (C) Β· 100 drops Very good (B) Β· 180 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
X200 FE +1%
90.3%
GT 7 (Global)
89.8%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X200 FE and Realme GT 7 (Global)
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
Max clock 3400 MHz 3400 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4		 - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 790 MediaTek NPU 790
GPU
Graphics Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X200 FE and Realme GT 7 (Global)
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
X200 FE +1%
2209
GT 7 (Global)
2184
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
X200 FE
7239
GT 7 (Global) +1%
7300
Compute Score (GPU)
X200 FE
15299
GT 7 (Global) +4%
15981
Compute Score (GPU) 15299 15981
Single-core score 2209 2184
Multi-core score 7239 7300
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
X200 FE
2140421
GT 7 (Global) +17%
2505807
CPU 662181 734964
GPU 664075 830537
Memory 295511 358578
UX 518654 581728
Total score 2140421 2505807
Samples [10 tests] [30 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
X200 FE
1561
GT 7 (Global) +23%
1916
Stability 65% 59%
Graphics test 12 FPS 14 FPS
Graphics score 1561 1916
3DMark Solar Bay
X200 FE
6745
GT 7 (Global) +19%
8040
Graphics test 26 FPS 31 FPS
Section 1 28 FPS 33 FPS
Section 2 26 FPS 31 FPS
Section 3 22 FPS 27 FPS
Graphics score 6745 8040
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
X200 FE
13962
GT 7 (Global) +9%
15256
Web score 13991 17009
Video editing 5556 6480
Photo editing 26454 26452
Data manipulation 12139 15003
Writing score 21943 22746
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#134th place)
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X200 FE
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Viva plesenь)AnTuTu2148340
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-31 (Jojorabbit95)AnTuTu2306009
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-14 (ShaSha)AnTuTu2235448
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (Pranav)AnTuTu2140421
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-17 (Sanjeep halder)AnTuTu1793939
Add View all (12)
Realme GT 7 (Global)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (montyy)AnTuTu2483073
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 -> Regenis0CPU Throttle76%
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 -> Regenis0AnTuTu2456694
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-22 (JP)AnTuTu2518801
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-10 (Nayan kumar)AnTuTu2399920
Add View all (38)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15
ROM Funtouch 15 Realme UI 6.0
OS size 57 GB -
OS updates 3 years 6 years
Security updates 4 years -

Battery

Capacity 6500 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 120 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging - Yes
Fast charging Yes (48% in 30 min) Yes (56% in 15 min)
Full charging time 0:58 hr 0:36 hr
Battery cycles 800 cycles 800 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 11:34 hr 18:23 hr
Watching video 15:00 hr 22:53 hr
Gaming 07:21 hr 09:51 hr
Standby 108 hr 113 hr
General battery life
X200 FE
25:14 hr
GT 7 (Global) +36%
34:22 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 2x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119Β° 112Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.8
Focal length 23 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX921 Sony IMX906
Sensor size 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.0
Focal length 70 mm 47 mm
Sensor Sony IMX882 Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Optical Digital
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 16 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV08D10 Omnivision OV08D10
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 -
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.5
Focal length 20 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KKD1 Sony IMX615
Sensor size 1/3.44" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch) 1/2.74" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
X200 FE
90.1 dB
GT 7 (Global)
n/a

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced June 2025 May 2025
Release date July 2025 May 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $650 $749
Successor - Vivo X300 FE -
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 120 W
Further details
Notes on GT 7 (Global):
    - The Dream Edition is thicker at 8.73 mm and 5 grams heavier.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera, gaming, and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Realme GT 7 (Global). But if the design and sound are more of a priority – go for the Vivo X200 FE.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
51 (53.7%)
44 (46.3%)
Total votes: 95

Related comparisons

1. Vivo X200 FE vs Vivo S30 Pro mini (1)
2. Vivo X200 FE vs OnePlus 13s (2)
3. Vivo X200 FE vs Honor 400 Pro
4. Vivo X200 FE vs Vivo X200s
5. Realme GT 7 (Global) vs Realme GT 7 (China)
6. Realme GT 7 (Global) vs Realme GT 7T
7. Realme GT 7 (Global) vs Realme GT 7 Pro
8. Realme GT 7 (Global) vs OnePlus 13R
9. Realme GT 7 (Global) vs Honor 400 Pro
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский