Vivo X200 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.82-inch Vivo X200 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on April 21, 2025, against the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max, which is powered by Apple A18 Pro and came out 7 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 Ultra
  • 77% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3092K versus 1750K)
  • Comes with 1315 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 4685 mAh
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 30W)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • 11% higher pixel density (510 vs 460 PPI)
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
  • Shows 43% longer battery life (35:01 vs 24:25 hours)
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • 18% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3507 and 2979 points
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X200 Ultra and Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
36.4
(Mediocre)
Value Index
60.2
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.82 inches 6.9 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3168 pixels 1320 x 2868 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.8:9 19.5:9
PPI 510 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 1600 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Screen protection Armor glass -
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 92.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 99.9% 99.6%
PWM 121 Hz 240 Hz
Response time 2 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1831 nits
1811 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 163.14 mm (6.42 inches) 163 mm (6.42 inches)
Width 76.76 mm (3.02 inches) 77.6 mm (3.06 inches)
Thickness 8.69 mm (0.34 inches) 8.25 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 229 g (8.08 oz) 227 g (8.01 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber -
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver, Red White, Black, Silver, Gold
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display No
Repairability - Average (2.83/5)
Drop resistance - Good (C) · 90 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
90.3%
92.3%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X200 Ultra and Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Apple A18 Pro
Max clock 4320 MHz 4040 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 6 (2 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 4 cores at 2.42 GHz: Sawtooth
- 2 cores at 4.05 GHz: Everest
L3 cache 8 MB -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Neural Engine
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 6 core Apple GPU
GPU shading units 1536 768
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1490 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~2289 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X200 Ultra and Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2979
3507
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
24604
33340
Compute Score (GPU) 24604 33340
Single-core score 2979 3507
Multi-core score 9353 8789
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
X200 Ultra +77%
3092340
CPU 819790 508577
GPU 1185591 540541
Memory 429927 191233
UX 657032 509980
Total score 3092340 1750331
Samples [11 tests] [4 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
X200 Ultra +49%
2561
Stability 50% 74%
Graphics test 19 FPS 13 FPS
Graphics score 2561 1718
3DMark Solar Bay
X200 Ultra +60%
11897
Graphics test 45 FPS 28 FPS
Section 1 51 FPS 34 FPS
Section 2 46 FPS 29 FPS
Section 3 39 FPS 21 FPS
Graphics score 11897 7448
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 15343 -
Video editing 7121 -
Photo editing 35679 -
Data manipulation 14476 -
Writing score 21329 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X200 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-01 (Tt_murco730)AnTuTu 113172230
📘 2026-06-07 (L_8888)AnTuTu 113074394
📘 2026-06-02 (Obsessed)AnTuTu 113179659
📘 2026-05-15 (Хзшник)AnTuTu 113172230
📘 2026-03-29 (Tijet)AnTuTu 113033519
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-23 -> RappzzzzAnTuTu 112043169
📘 2026-09-20 (thuanday)AnTuTu 112043169
📘 2026-09-17 (Jonibek)AnTuTu 111692383
📘 2026-07-21 (l1tsemerr)AnTuTu 111650968
📘 2026-04-27 -> hoduyhaodzso1tgBattery lifeSOT 12:58 / –

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 NVMe
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) iOS 18 (Can be upgraded to iOS 26.5)
ROM OriginOS 6 -
OS size - 18 GB
OS updates - 7 years
Security updates - 7 years

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 4685 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 30 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) Yes (15 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (64% in 30 min) Yes (46% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:49 hr 1:57 hr
Battery cycles - 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 12:14 hr 14:34 hr
Watching video 14:52 hr 22:01 hr
Gaming 06:38 hr 07:12 hr
Standby 95 hr 163 hr
General battery life
24:25 hr
35:01 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 48 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8064 x 6048
Zoom Optical, 3.7x Optical, 5x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 116° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 48 MP
2) Telephoto: 12 MP
3) Ultrawide: 48 MP
4) Depth
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.8
Focal length 35 mm 24 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-818 Sony IMX803
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 200 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.3 f/2.8
Focal length 85 mm 120 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HP9 Sony IMX913
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 14 mm 13 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-818 Sony IMX972
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Optical Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 175 160
Preview - 93
Zoom 159 130
Samples Photo samples of Vivo X200 Ultra from DxOMark Photo samples of Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 12 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 4032 x 3024
Aperture f/2.5 f/1.9
Focal length 24 mm 23 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL JN1 Sony IMX714
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Optical
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No Yes
DxOMark front camera
Photo - 149
Video - 155

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 -
Type of SIM card Nano eSIM
Multi SIM mode Standby -
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
87.4 dB
92.6 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced April 2025 September 2024
Release date April 2025 September 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $1099 $1199
Successor - - Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
SAR (head) - 1.22 W/kg
SAR (body) - 1.45 W/kg
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Not included
Further details
Notes on iPhone 16 Pro Max:
    - The US version of the smartphone exclusively supports eSIM, while the international model features both a physical SIM slot and eSIM capability. In China, the device is available with dual physical SIM card slots only.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the battery life, software, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max. But if the gaming is more of a priority – go for the Vivo X200 Ultra.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
621 (83.9%)
119 (16.1%)
Total votes: 740

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Paker September 13, 2025 at 03:14 AM
wait for 17 pro max
0 Reply
AizenSosuke. September 22, 2025 at 11:42 AM
then wait for x300 ultra too
+9 Reply
Nishh September 26, 2025 at 05:22 PM
We waited and it's such a sad phone
+3 Reply