Vivo X200 Ultra vs Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
87
out of 100
VS
74
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.82-inch Vivo X200 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on April 21, 2025, against the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra, which is powered by HiSilicon Kirin 9020 and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 Ultra
- 2.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3092K versus 1395K)
- Delivers 77% higher peak brightness (1806 against 1022 nits)
- Shows 20% longer battery life (24:25 vs 20:17 hours)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 12
- More energy-efficient CPU – Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Comes with 830 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5170 mAh
- 11% higher pixel density (510 vs 459 PPI)
Reasons to consider the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
- The rear camera has a 9.4x optical zoom
- Has 33% more RAM: 16GB versus 12GB
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.82 inches | 6.8 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels | 1276 x 2848 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.8:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 510 ppi | 459 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 3000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Armor glass | Kunlun Glass 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 90% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.9% | - |
| PWM | 121 Hz | - |
| Response time | 2 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 163.14 mm (6.42 inches) | 163 mm (6.42 inches) |
| Width | 76.76 mm (3.02 inches) | 76.1 mm (3 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.69 mm (0.34 inches) | 8.3 mm (0.33 inches) |
| Weight | 229 g (8.08 oz) | 233.5 g (8.24 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Silver, Red | Black, Gold, Brown |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-button |
| Repairability | - | Average (2.74/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Average (D) · 45 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | HiSilicon Kirin 9020 |
| Max clock | 4320 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
- 4 cores at 1.6 GHz: Taishan-Little - 3 cores at 2.15 GHz: TaiShan V120 - 1 core at 2.5 GHz: TaiShan V121 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 10 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | SMIC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Da Vinci |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Maleoon 920 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1024 |
| GPU clock | 1100 MHz | 840 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS | ~1720.3 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 24604 | 4356 |
| Single-core score | 2979 | 1248 |
| Multi-core score | 9353 | 4151 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 819790 | 487087 |
| GPU | 1185591 | 275022 |
| Memory | 429927 | 340981 |
| UX | 657032 | 292436 |
| Total score | 3092340 | 1395526 |
| Samples | [11 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 50% | - |
| Graphics test | 19 FPS | 3 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2561 | 454 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 45 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 51 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 46 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 39 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 11897 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 15343 | - |
| Video editing | 7121 | - |
| Photo editing | 35679 | - |
| Data manipulation | 14476 | - |
| Writing score | 21329 | - |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#96th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X200 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-01 (Tt_murco730) | AnTuTu 11 | 3172230 |
| 📘 2026-06-07 (L_8888) | AnTuTu 11 | 3074394 |
| 📘 2026-06-02 (Obsessed) | AnTuTu 11 | 3179659 |
| 📘 2026-05-15 (Хзшник) | AnTuTu 11 | 3172230 |
| 📘 2026-03-29 (Tijet) | AnTuTu 11 | 3033519 |
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-04-18 (Antonio) | AnTuTu 11 | 1395526 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 12 |
| ROM | OriginOS 6 | EMUI 15 |
| OS updates | - | 5 years |
| Security updates | - | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6000 mAh | 5170 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (40 W) | Yes (80 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (64% in 30 min) | Yes (83% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:49 hr | 0:34 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1000 cycles |
| Web browsing | 12:14 hr | 07:10 hr |
| Watching video | 14:52 hr | 15:01 hr |
| Gaming | 06:38 hr | 05:36 hr |
| Standby | 95 hr | 90 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Optical, 9.4x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 960 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 116° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Telephoto: 12.5 MP 4) Ultrawide: 40 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 - 4.0 |
| Focal length | 35 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Smartsens SC5AOCS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) | 1/0" (≈ Infinity inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 1.6 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | 83 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.56 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 40 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Omnivision OV40A |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) | 1/1.7" (≈ 0.59 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 175 | 175 |
| Zoom | 159 | 169 |
| Samples | Photo samples of Vivo X200 Ultra from DxOMark | Photo samples of Huawei Pura 80 Ultra from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL JN1 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes, DP 1.2 |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | April 2025 | June 2025 |
| Release date | April 2025 | June 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1099 | $1499 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X200 Ultra is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 255