Vivo X300 Pro vs Huawei Pura 90 Pro
91
out of 100
VS
79
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo X300 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on October 13, 2025, against the Huawei Pura 90 Pro, which is powered by HiSilicon Kirin 9030S and came out 6 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300 Pro
- 2.9x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3587K versus 1247K)
- Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 66W)
- More energy-efficient CPU – Dimensity 9500
- 2.6x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3228 and 1235 points
- Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Huawei Pura 90 Pro
- The rear camera has a 4x optical zoom
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- The phone is 6 months newer
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.6 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1256 x 2760 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.82:9 |
| PPI | 452 ppi | 459 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 2000 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 5000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Armor Glass | Kunlun Glass 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 90.4% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.7% | - |
| PWM | 360 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 161.98 mm (6.38 inches) | 157 mm (6.18 inches) |
| Width | 75.48 mm (2.97 inches) | 74.5 mm (2.93 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) | 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 226 g (7.97 oz) | 213.5 g (7.53 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Blue, Brown | White, Black, Pink, Orange |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-button |
| Repairability | Good (3/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) · 180 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | HiSilicon Kirin 9030S |
| Max clock | 4210 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro - 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium - 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra |
- 4 cores at 1.62 GHz: Taishan v124 Little - 3 cores at 2.15 GHz: Taishan v124 Mid - 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Taishan v124 Big |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | SMIC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 5 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 990 | Da Vinci |
| Graphics | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 | Maleoon 935F |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1716 MHz | 933 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~5271.5 GFLOPS | ~1433.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 27383 | 4287 |
| Single-core score | 3228 | 1235 |
| Multi-core score | 9553 | 3717 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1046355 | 293230 |
| GPU | 1382122 | 476557 |
| Memory | 388628 | 222374 |
| UX | 770724 | 254900 |
| Total score | 3587829 | 1247061 |
| Samples | [28 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 53% | - |
| Graphics test | 22 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 3036 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 51 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 57 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 51 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 45 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 13426 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 14329 | - |
| Video editing | 6016 | - |
| Photo editing | 36698 | - |
| Data manipulation | 14869 | - |
| Writing score | 25904 | - |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#34th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X300 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-09 (tiktok: @anonchapix) | CPU Throttle | 81% |
| 📘 2026-09-03 (chapix) | AnTuTu | 3935655 |
| 📘 2026-08-28 -> Rlamac012 | AnTuTu | 3729488 |
| 📘 2026-08-16 (chapix) | AnTuTu | 3884886 |
| 📘 2026-07-30 (ria) | AnTuTu | 3617138 |
Huawei Pura 90 Pro
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | HarmonyOS 6.1 |
| ROM | OriginOS 6 | - |
| OS size | 37 GB | - |
| OS updates | 5 years | - |
| Security updates | 7 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 6510 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 66 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (40 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (55% in 24 min) | Yes (50% in 25 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:50 hr | 0:59 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1200 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 13:30 hr | - |
| Watching video | 15:47 hr | - |
| Gaming | 07:14 hr | - |
| Standby | 81 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Optical, 4x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 960 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 119° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12.5 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.4 - 4.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-828 | Omnivision LightHunter 950L |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | 91 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HPB | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.56 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 12.5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 180 | - |
| Zoom | 159 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Vivo X300 Pro from DxOMark | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October 2025 | April 2026 |
| Release date | October 2025 | May 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $805 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 66 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X300 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 7