Xiaomi 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 11 Pro
92
out of 100
VS
84
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.9-inch Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on September 25, 2025, against the Google Pixel 11 Pro, which is powered by Google Tensor G6 and came out 11 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 2.1x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3998K versus 1925K)
- Comes with 2650 mAh larger battery capacity: 7500 vs 4850 mAh
- Has a 0.6 inch larger screen size
- Shows 42% longer battery life (36:26 vs 25:44 hours)
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 30W)
- Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- Thinner bezels – 5.1% more screen real estate
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 11 Pro
- Delivers 218% higher peak brightness (3260 against 1026 nits)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- The phone is 11 months newer
- More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
- 19% higher pixel density (497 vs 416 PPI)
- Better grip in hands – the body is 5.7 mm narrower
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2608 pixels | 1280 x 2856 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 416 ppi | 497 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1200 nits | 3600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3500 nits | 2400 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Dragon Crystal Glass 3 | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.4% | 87.3% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| RGB color space | 103% | - |
| PWM | 122 Hz | - |
| Response time | 63 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Screen space comparison
17 Pro Max
6.9″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 18.1 in2
Pixel 11 Pro
6.3″ (20:9 ratio) = 14.9 in2
~21% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 162.9 mm (6.41 inches) | 152.7 mm (6.01 inches) |
| Width | 77.6 mm (3.06 inches) | 71.9 mm (2.83 inches) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 inches) | 8.4 mm (0.33 inches) |
| Weight | 219 g (7.72 oz) | 204 g (7.2 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Green, Purple | Black, Blue, Green, Orange |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Google Tensor G6 |
| Max clock | 4610 MHz | 4110 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 7 (1 + 4 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
- 2 cores at 2.65 GHz: C1-Pro - 4 cores at 3.38 GHz: C1-Pro - 1 core at 4.11 GHz: C1-Ultra |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1286 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~1975.3 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 27311 | 6195 |
| Single-core score | 3697 | 2688 |
| Multi-core score | 11010 | 6871 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1196188 | 873099 |
| GPU | 1435952 | 286837 |
| Memory | 526360 | 301575 |
| UX | 839645 | 464012 |
| Total score | 3998145 | 1925523 |
| Samples | [4 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 75% | - |
| Graphics test | 18 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 2410 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 42 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 48 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 41 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 34 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 10958 | - |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Graphics test | 34 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 5808 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 17696 | - |
| Video editing | 8079 | - |
| Photo editing | 41496 | - |
| Data manipulation | 18359 | - |
| Writing score | 25803 | - |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#20th place)
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-09 -> PocoF5hyperos | AnTuTu 11 | 3241083 |
| 📘 2026-06-03 (Eterion) | AnTuTu 11 | 4008895 |
| 📘 2025-12-27 (Chan) | AnTuTu 11 | 3852243 |
| 📘 2025-11-02 (Okekdjekei) | AnTuTu 11 | 3998145 |
Google Pixel 11 Pro
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 17 |
| ROM | HyperOS 3 | Stock Android |
| OS size | 32 GB | - |
| OS updates | 6 years | 7 years |
| Security updates | 6 years | 7 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 7500 mAh | 4850 mAh |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 30 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (25 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (82% in 30 min) | Yes (59% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:48 hr | 1:20 hr |
| Web browsing | 16:28 hr | 10:48 hr |
| Watching video | 25:18 hr | 22:07 hr |
| Gaming | 09:04 hr | 06:33 hr |
| Standby | 143 hr | 86 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (11th and 143rd place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | - |
| Zoom | Optical, 5x | Optical, 5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 1920 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 102° | 123° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 48 MP 3) Ultrawide: 48 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision Light Fusion 950L | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) | 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 1.2 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length | 115 mm | 106 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN8 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 17 mm | - |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV50M40 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) | 1/2.51" (≈ 0.4 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 160 | - |
| Zoom | 137 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Xiaomi 17 Pro Max from DxOMark | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 17 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV50M40 | Sony IMX858 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) | 1/2.51" (≈ 0.4 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | September 2025 | August 2026 |
| Release date | September 2025 | August 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $1099 |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 100 W | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1