Xiaomi 17T Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro

92 out of 100
Xiaomi 17T Pro
VS
90 out of 100
Vivo X300 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi 17T Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on May 28, 2026, against the Vivo X300 Pro, which is powered by the same chip and came out 7 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17T Pro
  • Shows 49% longer battery life (36:42 vs 24:37 hours)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Delivers 34% higher peak brightness (3523 against 2637 nits)
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • The phone is 7 months newer
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300 Pro
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi 17T Pro and Vivo X300 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
88*
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
100
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
92*
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
56.8
(Average)
Value Index
35.0
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.83 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1280 x 2772 pixels 1260 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 447 ppi 452 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-144 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1100 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Armor Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 91.1% 90.8%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.7% 99.7%
PWM 120 Hz 360 Hz
Response time 1 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
17T Pro +34%
3523 nits
2637 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 162.2 mm (6.39 inches) 161.98 mm (6.38 inches)
Width 77.5 mm (3.05 inches) 75.48 mm (2.97 inches)
Thickness 8.25 mm (0.32 inches) 7.99 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 219 g (7.72 oz) 226 g (7.97 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Blue, Purple White, Black, Blue, Brown
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3/5)
Drop resistance - Very good (B) · 180 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
91.1%
90.8%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi 17T Pro and Vivo X300 Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
Max clock 4210 MHz 4210 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra
- 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra
L3 cache 16 MB 16 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 MediaTek NPU 990
GPU
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Mali-G1 Ultra MP12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1716 MHz 1716 MHz
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi 17T Pro and Vivo X300 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
17T Pro +3%
3334
3228
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
17T Pro +8%
10348
9553
Compute Score (GPU)
22721
X300 Pro +21%
27383
Compute Score (GPU) 22721 27383
Single-core score 3334 3228
Multi-core score 10348 9553
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3323591
X300 Pro +8%
3587829
CPU 933780 1046355
GPU 1300550 1382122
Memory 397001 388628
UX 692260 770724
Total score 3323591 3587829
Samples [25 tests] [28 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
n/a
3036
Stability - 53%
Graphics test - 22 FPS
Graphics score - 3036
3DMark Solar Bay
n/a
13426
Graphics test - 51 FPS
Section 1 - 57 FPS
Section 2 - 51 FPS
Section 3 - 45 FPS
Graphics score - 13426
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
n/a
16703
Web score - 14329
Video editing - 6016
Photo editing - 36698
Data manipulation - 14869
Writing score - 25904
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (62nd and 46th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi 17T Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-09 (hi)AnTuTu 123462409
📘 2026-10-04 (Elvin)AnTuTu 113330144
📘 2026-10-04 (SillyKilly)AnTuTu 123461876
📘 2026-10-03 (ISLAH AMINE)AnTuTu 123544347
📘 2026-10-03 (hi)AnTuTu 123485917
Vivo X300 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-27 (Pradip)AnTuTu 123930709
📘 2026-09-09 (tiktok: @anonchapix)CPU Throttle81%
📘 2026-09-09 (tiktok: @anonchapix)AnTuTu 124215102
📘 2026-09-03 (chapix)AnTuTu 113935655
📘 2026-08-28 -> Rlamac012AnTuTu 113729488

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz 5333 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 3 OriginOS 6
OS size 35.4 GB 37 GB
OS updates 5 years 5 years
Security updates 6 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 7000 mAh 6510 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (40 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (72% in 30 min) Yes (55% in 24 min)
Full charging time 0:44 hr 0:50 hr
Battery cycles - 1200 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 18:30 hr 13:30 hr
Watching video 24:44 hr 15:47 hr
Gaming 09:34 hr 07:14 hr
Standby 131 hr 81 hr
General battery life
17T Pro +49%
36:42 hr
24:37 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 5x Optical, 3.7x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 119°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.6
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Omnivision 950 LightHunter Sony LYT-828
Sensor size 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 1.2 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/3.0 f/2.7
Focal length 115 mm 85 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 Samsung ISOCELL HPB
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.56 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV13B Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
n/a
171
Video quality
n/a
169
Generic main camera score
n/a
171
Bokeh - 180
Zoom - 159
Samples - Photo samples of Vivo X300 Pro from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 6560 x 4928 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 21 mm 20 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KKD1 Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/3.42" (≈ 0.29 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
83.6 dB
X300 Pro +10%
91.8 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced May 2026 October 2025
Release date May 2026 October 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $899 $899
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the battery life, software, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi 17T Pro. But if the camera and connectivity are more of a priority – go for the Vivo X300 Pro.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
30 (45.5%)
36 (54.5%)
Total votes: 66

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Xiaomi x Vivo June 25, 2026 at 08:06 PM
Honestly, the difference in scores between these two phones is very small, but what I like about the Xiaomi 17T Pro is that it's on par with the Vivo X300 Pro but its price is much lower, and finally, I like the design.
+1 Reply
Avatar
AqL June 25, 2026 at 02:13 AM
I prefer the Xiaomi 17T Pro because it is cheaper and has more or less the same features, and the difference is very small with all the values only differing by 2 points.
+1 Reply
Avatar
KrulLeff September 9, 2026 at 11:48 AM
The camera is WAY better on the vivo, also USB 2.0 in a 900$ phone is ridiculous to me
0 Reply