Xiaomi Mi 9 SE vs Xiaomi 15T
Here we compared two smartphones: the 5.97-inch Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 712) that was released on February 20, 2019, against the Xiaomi 15T, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra and came out 6 years and 9 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- Better grip in hands – the body is 7.5 mm narrower
- Weighs 39 grams less
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 15T
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- 4.4x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1915K versus 434K)
- Comes with 2430 mAh larger battery capacity: 5500 vs 3070 mAh
- Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
- Delivers 141% higher peak brightness (1537 against 638 nits)
- Shows 61% longer battery life (26:15 vs 16:19 hours)
- Has a 0.86 inch larger screen size
- Has 2x more RAM: 12GB versus 6GB
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 18W)
- Optical image stabilization
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 11
- The phone is 6 years and 9 months newer
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 5.97 inches | 6.83 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels | 1280 x 2772 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 432 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (30-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 585 nits | 1100 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | - | 3200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 480 Hz |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 89.9% |
| Display features | - Always-On Display | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.9% | 99.7% |
| PWM | 255 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Response time | 4.2 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Screen space comparison
Xiaomi 15T
6.83″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 17.7 in2
Mi 9 SE
5.97″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 13.6 in2
~30% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 147.5 mm (5.81 inches) | 163.2 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 70.5 mm (2.78 inches) | 78 mm (3.07 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm (0.29 inches) | 7.5 mm (0.3 inches) |
| Weight | 155 g (5.47 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | - | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame material | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Purple | Black, Gray, Rose gold |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | - | Average (2.63/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Excellent (A) · 270 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 1.7 GHz: Kryo 360 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 2 cores at 2.3 GHz: Kryo 360 Gold (Cortex-A75) |
- 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725 |
| L3 cache | 1 MB | 6 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 10 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 685 DSP | MediaTek NPU 880 |
| Graphics | Adreno 616 | Mali-G720 MP7 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 896 |
| GPU clock | 610 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~312.3 GFLOPS | ~2329.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 11228 |
| Single-core score | 545 | 1632 |
| Multi-core score | 1594 | 6505 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 163890 | 601024 |
| GPU | 44262 | 581727 |
| Memory | 87907 | 320685 |
| UX | 138411 | 412008 |
| Total score | 434470 | 1915524 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | [16 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 88% |
| Graphics test | - | 9 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 1281 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 22 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 24 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 23 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 20 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 5899 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 15808 |
| Video editing | - | 6673 |
| Photo editing | - | 23714 |
| Data manipulation | - | 13815 |
| Writing score | - | 18234 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-31 (hoover) | AnTuTu 11 | 441305 |
| 📘 2026-07-03 (artemy) | AnTuTu 11 | 434470 |
| 📘 2026-03-18 (Vladimir) | AnTuTu 11 | 434173 |
Xiaomi 15T
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-03-31 (chebypeli100500) | AnTuTu 11 | 1926611 |
| 📘 2026-03-15 (Bers2409) | AnTuTu 11 | 2029273 |
| 📘 2026-01-24 (8arusadar) | AnTuTu 11 | 1940768 |
| 📘 2025-12-09 (Darwish) | AnTuTu 11 | 1881055 |
| 📘 2025-11-29 (Viktor) | AnTuTu 11 | 1939706 |
Memory
| RAM size | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 1866 MHz | - |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 9.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 11.0) | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | MIUI 12 | HyperOS 3.0 |
| OS size | 19 GB | 33 GB |
| OS updates | - | 5 years |
| Security updates | - | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 3070 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 18 W | 67 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes, Quick Charge 4 (50% in 30 min) | Yes (69% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:27 hr | 0:51 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1600 cycles |
| Web browsing | 05:40 hr | 11:09 hr |
| Watching video | 10:32 hr | 14:55 hr |
| Gaming | 03:52 hr | 06:40 hr |
| Standby | 83 hr | 125 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#131st place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8000 x 6000 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Optical, 2x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 123° | 120° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 48 MP 2) Telephoto: 8 MP 3) Ultrawide: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX586 | Omnivision OV50 Light Hunter 800 |
| Sensor size | 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) | 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 52 mm | 46 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV8856 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3L6 | OmniVision OV13B |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch) | 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 20 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 5120 x 3840 | 6560 x 4928 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 18 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX576 | Samsung KD1S5KKD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.78" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.9 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | - | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 15 | - |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | February 2019 | September 2025 |
| Release date | March 2019 | September 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $400 | $650 |
| Successor | - Xiaomi 15T | - |
| SAR (head) | 1.39 W/kg | - |
| SAR (body) | 1.39 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | - | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi 15T is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1