M1 (iPad) vs Apple A18

We compared the 8-core Apple M1 (iPad) (custom) with the newer 6-core Apple A18 (Apple A18 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Apple M1 (iPad)
  • Performs 37% better in floating-point computations
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Supports 14% higher memory bandwidth (68.25 against 60 GB/s)
Pros of Apple A18
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 5 nm)
  • 27% higher CPU clock speed (4050 vs 3200 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~17%)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
M1 (iPad) +3%
2027700
1972476
CPU 629472 611649
GPU 687856 589953
Memory 214672 181123
UX 495700 589751
Total score 2027700 1972476
Samples [9 tests] [29 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
2385
Apple A18 +44%
3431
Multi-Core Score
M1 (iPad) +2%
8775
8638
Asset compression 331.8 MB/sec 286.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 174.3 pages/sec 184.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 223.3 Mpixels/sec 201.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 192.9 images/sec 297.2 images/sec
HDR 290 Mpixels/sec 279.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 34.7 images/sec 36.2 images/sec
Photo processing 72.7 images/sec 90 images/sec
Ray tracing 9.72 Mpixels/sec 8.68 Mpixels/sec
Samples 5 tests 6 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
M1 (iPad) +18%
33168
28010
Background blur 59.4 images/sec 49.2 images/sec
Face detection 71.1 images/sec 71.8 images/sec
Horizon detection 1.09 Gpixels/sec 0.86 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.52 Gpixels/sec 1.14 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.6 Gpixels/sec 1.44 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.42 Gpixels/sec 0.39 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 107 Gpixels/sec 77.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3208.4 FPS 2811.1 FPS
API Metal Metal
Samples Less than 3 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
M1 (iPad) +24%
1965
1579
Score 1965 1579
Stability 77% 75%
Graphics test 15 FPS 12 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
6406
Apple A18 +5%
6750
Score 6406 6750
Stability 83% -
Graphics test 24 FPS 26 FPS
Section 1 30 FPS 31 FPS
Section 2 24 FPS 26 FPS
Section 3 19 FPS 20 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
5045
n/a
Score 5045 -
Stability 76% -
Graphics test 30 FPS -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Apple M1 (iPad)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-24 -> op1Geekbench 6 CPU2420 / 8793
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-04 (クラ硢)AnTuTu 112074840
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-18 (Avacada)Geekbench 6 CPU2385 / 8775
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-08 (AL10)AnTuTu 112123766
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-29 (Blizz)AnTuTu 112011970
Apple A18
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-30 (Dddd)AnTuTu 111905485
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 (Aj)AnTuTu 111949745
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-15 (vovachips)AnTuTu 111842572
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-03 (iTzRageeh)Geekbench 6 CPU3531 / 9122
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-03 (iTzRageeh)AnTuTu 112045650

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of M1 (iPad) and Apple A18

CPU

Architecture 4x 3.2 GHz – Firestorm
4x 2.1 GHz – Icestorm
2x 4.05 GHz – Everest
4x 2.42 GHz – Sawtooth
Cores 8 6
Frequency 3200 MHz 4050 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.5-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB -
L2 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Process 5 nanometers 3 nanometers
Transistor count 16 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 14 W 9 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name - Apple A18 GPU
Architecture - Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1278 MHz 1490 MHz
Pipelines - 5
Shading units - 128
Total shaders - 640
FLOPS 2617 Gigaflops 1907 Gigaflops

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Apple Neural Engine Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance 11 TOPS 35 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3750 MHz
Bus 8x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.25 Gb/s 60 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type NVMe NVMe
Max display resolution 2732 x 2048 -
Max camera resolution - 1x 48MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Snapdragon X71 5G
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 10000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 7
Bluetooth 5.0 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced November 2020 September 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number APL1102 APL1V08
Successor - Apple M4 (iPad) - Apple A19

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
202 (58.6%)
143 (41.4%)
Total votes: 345

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Apple A18 and M1 (iPad), or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Nice March 9, 2026 at 11:37 AM
nice job, deep analytics. well done!
0 Reply
Avatar
mcity900 June 4, 2025 at 05:53 AM
M1 was the highest jump to compare with previous gen,staying very close to M2 and M3,that’s why it is still so good
+4 Reply
Avatar
Sigma rizzler February 20, 2025 at 04:52 AM
4 yrs and that close! Impressive as heck
+5 Reply
Avatar
Skibidi November 16, 2024 at 06:02 PM
No way the a18 chip is a bit better than the m1 chip
+43 Reply
IliasPanagasov June 24, 2025 at 05:11 PM
50% better in single core is that a little and that's not even a mobile chipset
+3 Reply
Avatar
ysor September 18, 2024 at 05:49 PM
4 years and still less thatn 5% impressive
+38 Reply
Avatar
Wth February 20, 2025 at 09:44 AM
difference in RAM is that everything has limitations. Try comparing it to the pro version.
0 Reply