Apple A18 vs A16 Bionic

We compared two 6-core processors: Apple A18 (with Apple A18 GPU graphics) and A16 Bionic (Apple A16 GPU). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Apple A18
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • 17% higher CPU clock speed (4050 vs 3460 MHz)
  • Supports 17% higher memory bandwidth (60 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 21%) AnTuTu 11 score โ€“ 1972K vs 1626K
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Higher GPU frequency (~7%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Apple A18 +21%
1972476
1626008
CPU 611649 432740
GPU 589953 490354
Memory 181123 216774
UX 589751 486140
Total score 1972476 1626008
Samples [29 tests] [36 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Apple A18 +30%
3431
2631
Multi-Core Score
Apple A18 +31%
8638
6602
Asset compression 286.8 MB/sec 234.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 184.2 pages/sec 155.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 201.2 Mpixels/sec 157.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 297.2 images/sec 149.7 images/sec
HDR 279.1 Mpixels/sec 202.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 36.2 images/sec 25.9 images/sec
Photo processing 90 images/sec 76.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 8.68 Mpixels/sec 6.74 Mpixels/sec
Samples 6 tests 24 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Apple A18 +23%
28010
22851
Background blur 49.2 images/sec 39.5 images/sec
Face detection 71.8 images/sec 50.9 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.86 Gpixels/sec 0.73 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.14 Gpixels/sec 1.05 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.44 Gpixels/sec 1.22 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.39 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 77.7 Gpixels/sec 70.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2811.1 FPS 2162.5 FPS
API Metal Metal
Samples 4 tests 12 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1579 -
Stability 75% -
Graphics test 12 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Apple A18 +58%
6750
4266
Score 6750 4266
Stability - 74%
Graphics test 26 FPS 16 FPS
Section 1 31 FPS 20 FPS
Section 2 26 FPS 16 FPS
Section 3 20 FPS 12 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 3335
Stability - 71%
Graphics test - 19 FPS

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Apple A18
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-30 (Dddd)AnTuTu 111905485
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-18 (Aj)AnTuTu 111949745
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-15 (vovachips)AnTuTu 111842572
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-03 (iTzRageeh)Geekbench 6 CPU3531 / 9122
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-03 (iTzRageeh)AnTuTu 112045650
Apple A16 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Peltsi74)AnTuTu 111477304
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-21 (ะั‚ะพะผะฝะฐั ะฑะพะผะฑะฐ)AnTuTu 111772840
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Bear lover)AnTuTu 111714105
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-14 (ZUSEPRO)AnTuTu 111603687
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-31 (LORDroid)AnTuTu 111445126

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Apple A18 and A16 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 2x 4.05 GHz โ€“ Everest
4x 2.42 GHz โ€“ Sawtooth
2x 3.46 GHz โ€“ Everest
4x 2.02 GHz โ€“ Sawtooth
Cores 6 6
Frequency 4050 MHz 3460 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8.6-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache 8 MB 16 MB
Process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count - 16 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W 8 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Apple A18 GPU Apple A16 GPU
Architecture Apple Bionic GPU Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1490 MHz 1398 MHz
Pipelines 5 5
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 640 640
FLOPS 1907 Gigaflops 1789.4 Gigaflops

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Neural Engine Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance 35 TOPS 17 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3750 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 60 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type NVMe NVMe
Max display resolution - 2796 x 1290
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP 1x 48MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X71 5G -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 10000 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3500 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced September 2024 September 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number APL1V08 APL1W10
Successor - Apple A19 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
534 (63.6%)
306 (36.4%)
Total votes: 840

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A16 Bionic and Apple A18, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Tom July 29, 2025 at 02:41 AM
a16 is good but a18 supports apple intelligence and is faster and just better
+22 Reply
Avatar
iShowSpeed September 5, 2025 at 12:46 PM
But A16 is also good for apple intelligence, if apple allows it lol
+20 Reply
Avatar
Ana September 11, 2024 at 05:22 AM
Also, why is Apple A18 missing so many features as compared to Apple Bionic A16? are the features missing for good or bad?
+406 Reply
Avatar
Quan April 29, 2026 at 09:05 AM
A18 is not missing important features compared to A16. The differences mainly come from marketing names, device features, and product tiering. Technically, A18 is faster, more efficient, and much better for AI.
+1 Reply
Avatar
Ana September 11, 2024 at 05:21 AM
I would like to know what is the the difference between bionic and non-bionic (such as Apple A18)? What is it that bionic chip stand out for?
+114 Reply
Avatar
lalala September 24, 2024 at 11:08 AM
bionic is just a naming convention
+46 Reply
Avatar
Quan April 29, 2026 at 09:07 AM
โ€œBionicโ€ was mainly a marketing name Apple used for chips like Apple A16 Bionic. Newer chips such as Apple A18 no longer use the word โ€œBionic,โ€ but the technology is essentially the same (CPU, GPU, Neural Engine, AI processing, camera processing). Apple likely dropped the โ€œBionicโ€ label to simplify naming and focus on โ€œProโ€ chip tiers, like Apple A18 Pro.
+1 Reply