Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Apple A18

We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (Adreno 750) with the newer 6-core Apple A18 (Apple A18 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  • Performs 45% better in floating-point computations
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Supports 28% higher memory bandwidth (76.8 against 60 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 19%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2345K vs 1972K
Pros of Apple A18
  • Higher GPU frequency (~49%)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • 23% higher CPU clock speed (4050 vs 3300 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2345563
1972476
CPU 700525 611649
GPU 805478 589953
Memory 296043 181123
UX 543517 589751
Total score 2345563 1972476
Samples [443 tests] [29 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Apple A18 +56%
3431
Multi-Core Score
Apple A18 +33%
8638
Asset compression 256.8 MB/sec 286.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 190.9 pages/sec 184.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 209.1 Mpixels/sec 201.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 168.6 images/sec 297.2 images/sec
HDR 208.6 Mpixels/sec 279.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 24 images/sec 36.2 images/sec
Photo processing 63.6 images/sec 90 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.27 Mpixels/sec 8.68 Mpixels/sec
Samples 139 tests 6 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Apple A18 +82%
28010
Background blur 26.9 images/sec 49.2 images/sec
Face detection 13.2 images/sec 71.8 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.7 Gpixels/sec 0.86 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.61 Gpixels/sec 1.14 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.98 Gpixels/sec 1.44 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.39 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 43.4 Gpixels/sec 77.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3083.6 FPS 2811.1 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Samples 90 tests 4 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1652 1579
Stability 79% 75%
Graphics test 12 FPS 12 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
8190
6750
Score 8190 6750
Stability 72% -
Graphics test 31 FPS 26 FPS
Section 1 36 FPS 31 FPS
Section 2 31 FPS 26 FPS
Section 3 26 FPS 20 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 4676 -
Graphics test 27 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 16536 -
Video editing score 7905 -
Data manipulation score 14260 -
Photo editing score 31248 -
Writing score 19168 -
Phones tested 41 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (gertjan28)AnTuTu 112286235
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (neko_rhythm)AnTuTu 112406819
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Denislav Antimov)AnTuTu 122573019
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (DEMON77)AnTuTu 122536327
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Dairy_Milk)AnTuTu 122593648
Apple A18
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-30 (Dddd)AnTuTu 111905485
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 (Aj)AnTuTu 111949745
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-15 (vovachips)AnTuTu 111842572
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-03 (iTzRageeh)Geekbench 6 CPU3531 / 9122
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-03 (iTzRageeh)AnTuTu 112045650

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and Apple A18

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 3.15 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 4.05 GHz – Everest
4x 2.42 GHz – Sawtooth
Cores 8 6
Frequency 3300 MHz 4050 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB
L3 cache 12 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 9 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 750 Apple A18 GPU
Architecture Adreno 700 Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 903-1000 MHz 1490 MHz
Pipelines 6 5
Shading units 256 128
Total shaders 1536 640
FLOPS 2774 Gigaflops 1907 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 35 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 3750 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 60 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 -
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 48MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X75 Snapdragon X71 5G
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 10000 Mbps Up to 10000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3500 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 5.4 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2023 September 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8650-AB, SM8650-AC APL1V08
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 official site -
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - Apple A19
Further details
Notes on Snapdragon 8 Gen 3:
    - Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy has a 100 MHz higher CPU and GPU clock speed. It has a higher GPU performance rate of up to 3072 Gigaflops.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
465 (51.1%)
445 (48.9%)
Total votes: 910

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Apple A18 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
cpu September 7, 2025 at 07:19 PM
i like snapdragon and mediatek but the thing i always notice is apple always have a very high single core score, for me, single core matters more than multi.
+12 Reply
Avatar
Emma July 15, 2025 at 09:25 AM
Snapdragon is the eater of cheap apples and some bionics.
+1 Reply
Avatar
Ryzen 4070 User January 3, 2025 at 11:28 PM
I appreciate the iPhone 16 Pro for several reasons. Firstly, when it comes to productivity and gaming tasks, the A18 Pro chip consistently outperforms the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, showcasing impressive capabilities. Additionally, the A18 Pro features a more advanced security system, making it a safer choice compared to many Android devices that can be vulnerable to cyber threats. In terms of photography, my experience suggests that the 16 Pro’s camera delivers superior performance compared to the S24 Ultra, despite having a lower megapixel count in the main sensor. This highlights Apple's emphasis on quality over quantity in camera technology. I also find the 16 Pro to be notably more durable, utilizing a Grade 5 Titanium frame, while the S24 Ultra is constructed with Grade 2 titanium. Both devices feature durable glass on the front and back, but Apple’s Ceramic Shield offers enhanced scratch resistance. One attribute I admire about the S24 Ultra is its anti-reflective coating, which would be a fantastic addition if Apple could incorporate something similar in the iPhone 17 and 17 Pro lineup. Lastly, I believe that iOS provides a better user experience overall, especially regarding privacy, as it appears to respect user data more than the Android ecosystem, which can often be a concern for privacy-conscious individuals.
+14 Reply
Avatar
Last October 10, 2024 at 10:08 AM
I buy Android solely because of the vast range of possibilities that can be done without a PC, which cannot be said about the iPhone.
+47 Reply