Tensor G6 vs A20 Pro

We compared the 7-core Google Tensor G6 (PowerVR CXTP-48-1536) with the newer 6-core Apple A20 Pro (Apple A20 Pro GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Google Tensor G6
  • Has 1 more cores
Pros of Apple A20 Pro
  • Shows significantly better (up to 78%) AnTuTu 11 score – 3434K vs 1933K
  • Supports 69% higher memory bandwidth (115.2 against 68.2 GB/s)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (2 versus 3 nm)
  • Performs 47% better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~26%)
  • 20% higher CPU clock speed (4930 vs 4110 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
vs

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1933536
A20 Pro +78%
3434654
CPU 876037 879839
GPU 288736 1407166
Memory 304202 418755
UX 464561 728894
Total score 1933536 3434654
Samples [4 tests] Less than 3
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
2755
A20 Pro +72%
4733
Multi-Core Score
7563
A20 Pro +70%
12836
Samples 6 tests -
Compute Score (GPU)
6216
A20 Pro +948%
65153
Samples 3 tests -
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
n/a
4263
Score - 4263
3DMark Solar Bay
n/a
17850
Score - 17850
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
n/a
9024
Score - 9024

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Google Tensor G6
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (Roni)Geekbench 6 CPU2888 / 7641
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Flxen)Geekbench 6 CPU2755 / 7563
Apple A20 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-22 -> sammzzAnTuTu 113429537
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-19 (Bears lover)AnTuTu 113651257
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-14 -> LiberoGeekbench 6 CPU4739 / 12815
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-14 -> LiberoGeekbench 6 CPU4738 / 12831
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (zsc)Geekbench 7 CPU4047 / 11701

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Tensor G6 and A20 Pro

CPU

Architecture 1x 4.11 GHz – C1-Ultra
4x 3.38 GHz – C1-Pro
2x 2.65 GHz – C1-Pro
2x 4.93 GHz –
4x 2.64 GHz –
Cores 7 6
Frequency 4110 MHz 4930 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv9.4-A
L1 cache - 192 KB
L2 cache - 16 MB
L3 cache 8 MB -
Process 3 nanometers 2 nanometers
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 Apple A20 Pro GPU
Architecture - Apple A GPU
GPU frequency 1286 MHz 1620 MHz
Pipelines 6 7
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 768 896
FLOPS 1975.3 Gigaflops 2903 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Apple Neural Engine

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 3x 32 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 115.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 -
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 3x 48MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem MediaTek M90 Apple C2
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 12000 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced August 2026 September 2026
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number GS601 APL1Y01

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
10 (17.9%)
46 (82.1%)
Total votes: 56

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A20 Pro and Tensor G6, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Tera47 November 5, 2026 at 05:07 PM
Trash vs garbage, but i'll still take A20 Pro (even though i hate Apple). The A20 Pro's GPU architecture is way more powerful and the drivers are far more better.
0 Reply
sevensrays November 5, 2026 at 11:27 PM
garbage (just most powerful mobile chip at this moment) such an irony to hear this words from huawei user lol
-1 Reply
Tera47 November 6, 2026 at 12:01 AM
sevensrays, Actually, 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 is more powerful in real world usage. About Huawei, have you ever used a single product of them? My Pura 80 Pro with Kirin 9020 (theoretically worse than Apple A15) just humiliates my iPhone 13 in performance, while it also performs slightly better than Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 on my old Galaxy S23 Ultra.
0 Reply