Dimensity 8350 vs Dimensity 7025

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (with Mali-G615 MP6 graphics) and Dimensity 7025 (IMG BXM-8-256). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  • Performs 8.8x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 166% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2.6x) AnTuTu 11 score – 1724K vs 668K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~47%)
  • 34% higher CPU clock speed (3350 vs 2500 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1724757
CPU 514672 262953
GPU 480538 60217
Memory 275946 141219
UX 453601 204073
Total score 1724757 668462
Samples [198 tests] [30 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 186.1 MB/sec 122.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 139.7 pages/sec 64.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 134.2 Mpixels/sec 95.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 88.8 images/sec 47.9 images/sec
HDR 116.5 Mpixels/sec 77.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.9 images/sec 7.74 images/sec
Photo processing 36.3 images/sec 24.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 5 Mpixels/sec 3.36 Mpixels/sec
Samples 25 tests 10 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
9142
Background blur 15.8 images/sec 1.13 images/sec
Face detection 7.75 images/sec 0.61 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.54 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.47 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.2 Gpixels/sec 1.95 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1712.6 FPS 195 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 16 tests 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1205 -
Graphics test 9 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 4852 -
Graphics test 18 FPS -
Section 1 20 FPS -
Section 2 19 FPS -
Section 3 16 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 14361
Video editing score - 5525
Data manipulation score - 10873
Photo editing score - 23703
Writing score - 15057
Phones tested - 5 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8350
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Rolling)AnTuTu 121705856
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Rh adnan)AnTuTu 121682268
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Riyaz)AnTuTu 121763868
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 (Murafal)AnTuTu 121790753
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Madara)AnTuTu 111772072
MediaTek Dimensity 7025
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Rayylor)AnTuTu 12789683
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (kilobyte.tech)AnTuTu 12704537
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (WillowWilson78)AnTuTu 11659483
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (Dud)AnTuTu 11658200
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Dud)AnTuTu 11635368

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8350 and Dimensity 7025

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715
3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3350 MHz 2500 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G615 MP6 IMG BXM-8-256
Architecture Valhall 4rd gen PowerVR IMG GPU
GPU frequency 1400 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 6 8
Shading units 128 16
Total shaders 768 128
FLOPS 2150.4 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version - 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 780 MediaTek NPU 550

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem MediaTek T800 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5170 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.4 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced November 2024 April 2024
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6897, MT6897Z_A/ZA MT8792Z/NA (MT6855V/ATZA, MT6855V_A/ATZA
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8350 official site MediaTek Dimensity 7025 official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 8450 -
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8350:
    - The Dimensity 8350 Ultra differs from the Dimensity 8350 by featuring a new Gaming Engine.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
11 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 11

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7025 and Dimensity 8350, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!