Dimensity 8400 vs Dimensity 8350

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (with Mali-G720 MP7 graphics) and Dimensity 8350 (Mali-G615 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 8350
  • Shows better (up to 13%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1948K vs 1724K
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  • Higher GPU frequency (~8%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1948428
1724757
CPU 623766 514672
GPU 596540 480538
Memory 331200 275946
UX 396922 453601
Total score 1948428 1724757
Samples [313 tests] [198 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 248.7 MB/sec 186.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 189.2 pages/sec 139.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 189.3 Mpixels/sec 134.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 111.1 images/sec 88.8 images/sec
HDR 166.2 Mpixels/sec 116.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 19.8 images/sec 12.9 images/sec
Photo processing 58 images/sec 36.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.1 Mpixels/sec 5 Mpixels/sec
Samples 45 tests 25 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
12162
Background blur 21.3 images/sec 15.8 images/sec
Face detection 11.1 images/sec 7.75 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.52 Gpixels/sec 0.41 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.71 Gpixels/sec 0.54 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.66 Gpixels/sec 0.47 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 37.2 Gpixels/sec 16.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1703.3 FPS 1712.6 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 31 tests 16 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1346 1205
Stability 86% -
Graphics test 10 FPS 9 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 5948 4852
Graphics test 23 FPS 18 FPS
Section 1 25 FPS 20 FPS
Section 2 23 FPS 19 FPS
Section 3 20 FPS 16 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14034 -
Video editing score 6661 -
Data manipulation score 13175 -
Photo editing score 23584 -
Writing score 17637 -
Phones tested 5 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Xann)AnTuTu 122143962
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (AYS)AnTuTu 122192420
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (tadslj)AnTuTu 111988365
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (JenKenny)AnTuTu 112063774
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (POCOMAN)AnTuTu 122112771
MediaTek Dimensity 8350
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Amooarman)AnTuTu 121904000
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (Hosh)AnTuTu 111909681
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (Parvej)AnTuTu 121663473
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 (Unknown)AnTuTu 121907710
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Pranav)AnTuTu 121714372

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8400 and Dimensity 8350

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-A725
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A725
1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715
3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3250 MHz 3350 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9-A
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 6 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G720 MP7 Mali-G615 MP6
Architecture 5th gen Valhall 4rd gen
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 1400 MHz
Pipelines 7 6
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 896 768
FLOPS 2329.6 Gigaflops 2150.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 MediaTek APU 780

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem - MediaTek T800
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5170 Mbps Up to 5170 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 6.0 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2024 November 2024
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6899, MT6899Z MT6897, MT6897Z_A/ZA MT8792Z/NA
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8400 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8350 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 8450
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8400:
    - β€œDimensity 8400 Ultra” is the same chip as β€œDimensity 8400” but marketed for better thermals and sustained performance.
Notes on Dimensity 8350:
    - The Dimensity 8350 Ultra differs from the Dimensity 8350 by featuring a new Gaming Engine.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1022 (83.8%)
198 (16.2%)
Total votes: 1220

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8350 and Dimensity 8400, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Qkotman YT June 2, 2026 at 02:35 AM
dimensity 8400 flagship no mid range dimensity 8350 flagship no mid range 2 processor overkill to mid range please fix update class category nanoreview
+6 Reply
Avatar
Ayane September 13, 2026 at 04:51 PM
it's midrange, not flagship
+1 Reply