Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 7025

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (IMG BXM-8-256). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 77% better in floating-point computations
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  • Supports 51% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17 GB/s)
  • 14% higher CPU clock speed (2500 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~13%)
  • Shows better (up to 13%) AnTuTu 11 score – 668K vs 592K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
668462
CPU 237904 262953
GPU 56314 60217
Memory 136317 141219
UX 161480 204073
Total score 592015 668462
Samples [83 tests] [30 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 122.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 64.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 95.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 47.9 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 77.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 7.74 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 24.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 3.36 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 10 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 1.13 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 0.61 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 1.95 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 195 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 23 tests 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
12296
Web score 9704 14361
Video editing score 3911 5525
Data manipulation score 8663 10873
Photo editing score 18151 23703
Writing score 13129 15057
Phones tested 21 models 5 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
-
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]
-
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939
MediaTek Dimensity 7025
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (kilobyte.tech)AnTuTu 12704537
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (WillowWilson78)AnTuTu 11659483
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (Dud)AnTuTu 11658200
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Dud)AnTuTu 11635368
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-23 (MABS)AnTuTu 11630214

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 7025

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2500 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 IMG BXM-8-256
Architecture Adreno 600 PowerVR IMG GPU
GPU frequency 840 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 2 8
Shading units 128 16
Total shaders 256 128
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 MediaTek NPU 550

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 April 2024
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 (MT6855V/ATZA, MT6855V_A/ATZA
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site MediaTek Dimensity 7025 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
265 (23.2%)
876 (76.8%)
Total votes: 1141

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7025 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Kartik May 22, 2025 at 09:36 AM
Yo, I am Kartik Kumar and I am not happy to buy D7025
+57 Reply
Avatar
Sab January 4, 2026 at 10:45 AM
What are the downsides
+6 Reply