Dimensity 8550 vs Dimensity 8500

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8550 (with Mali-G720 MP8 graphics) and Dimensity 8500 (Mali-G720 MP8). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8550
  • Shows better (up to 15%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2429K vs 2120K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2429134
2120347
CPU 612932 649177
GPU 952016 633638
Memory 394012 376271
UX 470174 461261
Total score 2429134 2120347
Samples Less than 3 [81 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression - 279.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser - 201 pages/sec
PDF Renderer - 223.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection - 136.2 images/sec
HDR - 224 Mpixels/sec
Background blur - 24.3 images/sec
Photo processing - 70.7 images/sec
Ray tracing - 7.64 Mpixels/sec
Samples Less than 3 18 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
15146
Background blur - 20.3 images/sec
Face detection - 10.3 images/sec
Horizon detection - 0.56 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection - 0.62 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur - 0.8 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching - 0.2 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching - 46.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics - 2219.4 FPS
API - OpenCL
Samples Less than 3 17 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 4058
Stability - 77%

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8550
No benchmark results yet
MediaTek Dimensity 8500
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Sakolin)AnTuTu2117709
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Kunmeow22)GeekBench CPU1547 / 6536
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (punyaphat dumnu)GeekBench GPU12528
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (punyaphat dumnu)GeekBench CPU1690 / 6497
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (Cronchik)AnTuTu2241933

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8550 and Dimensity 8500

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-A725
3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A725
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A725
1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-A725
3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A725
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A725
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3400 MHz 3400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 6 MB 6 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G720 MP8 Mali-G720 MP8
Architecture Valhall 5th gen Valhall 5th gen
GPU frequency 1508 MHz 1508 MHz
Pipelines 8 8
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 1024 1024
FLOPS 3088.4 Gigaflops 3088.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 MediaTek NPU 880

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 76.8 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5170 Mbps Up to 5170 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2026 January 2026
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6899, MT6899Z_T/TZA MT6899Z_A/TZA
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8550 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8500 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
85 (63%)
50 (37%)
Total votes: 135

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8500 and Dimensity 8550, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Ben June 9, 2026 at 08:48 PM
Same trash,different name,100% same to same
0 Reply
Avatar
DaBestOne July 31, 2026 at 07:12 PM
But why trash though
+2 Reply
Avatar
n_thesisS September 5, 2026 at 05:01 PM
DaBestOne, because 8400 is generally cheaper and more worth it because 8500 and 8550 have inflated prices
0 Reply