Snapdragon 750G vs Snapdragon 690

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (with Adreno 619 graphics) and Snapdragon 690 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
  • Higher GPU frequency (~42%)
  • Performs 42% better in floating-point computations
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 2000 MHz)
  • Supports 14% higher memory bandwidth (17 against 14.9 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 14%) AnTuTu 11 score – 566K vs 499K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
566483
CPU 242759 205382
GPU 50920 52431
Memory 92020 78632
UX 180784 162595
Total score 566483 499040
Samples [8 tests] Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 158.2 MB/sec 96.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 67.9 pages/sec 50.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 111.2 Mpixels/sec 65 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 55.2 images/sec 38 images/sec
HDR 94.1 Mpixels/sec 59.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.2 images/sec 5.13 images/sec
Photo processing 26.7 images/sec 16.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.76 Mpixels/sec 2.8 Mpixels/sec
Samples 3 tests 2 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 5.05 images/sec 1.52 images/sec
Face detection 2.58 images/sec 0.64 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.19 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 3.29 Gpixels/sec 2.92 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 242.4 FPS 165.3 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 3 tests 2 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 333 -
Graphics test 1 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 7576 -
Video editing score 6985 -
Data manipulation score 7680 -
Photo editing score 19274 -
Writing score 8986 -
Phones tested 3 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 58 FPS
[High]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 37 FPS
[High]
-
Fortnite 28 FPS
[Medium]
-
Shadowgun Legends 61 FPS
[Low]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 56 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Jason Baker)Geekbench 6 CPU828 / 1875
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Jason Baker)AnTuTu 11556264
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Erick Silva)AnTuTu 11599951
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-28 (Breno)AnTuTu 11614247
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (JΓ£o)AnTuTu 11579715
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2024-10-07 (HXR)Geekbench 6 GPU966
πŸ“˜ 2024-10-07 (HXR)Geekbench 6 CPU780 / 1897

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 750G and Snapdragon 690

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 570 Gold (Cortex-A77)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 570 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2 GHz – Kryo 560 Gold (Cortex-A77)
6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 560 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache 3 MB -
Process 8 nanometers 8 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W -
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 800 MHz 565 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 256
FLOPS 409.6 Gigaflops 289.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 694 Hexagon 692
NPU theoretical performance - 5 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 14.9 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 32MP 1x 192MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X52 Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 900 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2020 June 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7225 SM6350
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
501 (68.9%)
226 (31.1%)
Total votes: 727

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 690 and Snapdragon 750G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!