Snapdragon 750G vs Snapdragon 695

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (with Adreno 619 graphics) and Snapdragon 695 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 8 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~5%)
  • Shows better (up to 5%) AnTuTu 11 score – 592K vs 566K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
592015
CPU 242759 237904
GPU 50920 56314
Memory 92020 136317
UX 180784 161480
Total score 566483 592015
Samples [8 tests] [83 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 158.2 MB/sec 102.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 67.9 pages/sec 55.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 111.2 Mpixels/sec 72.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 55.2 images/sec 40.7 images/sec
HDR 94.1 Mpixels/sec 61.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.2 images/sec 5.46 images/sec
Photo processing 26.7 images/sec 19.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.76 Mpixels/sec 2.67 Mpixels/sec
Samples 3 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 5.05 images/sec 2.26 images/sec
Face detection 2.58 images/sec 0.98 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.19 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 3.29 Gpixels/sec 4.35 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 242.4 FPS 245.1 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 3 tests 23 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 333 360
Stability - 98%
Graphics test 1 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 7576 9704
Video editing score 6985 3911
Data manipulation score 7680 8663
Photo editing score 19274 18151
Writing score 8986 13129
Phones tested 3 models 21 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 58 FPS
[High]
66 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 37 FPS
[High]
60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite 28 FPS
[Medium]
24 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 61 FPS
[Low]
67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS
[Ultra]
57 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 19 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 56 FPS
[Ultra]
42 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite
1080 x 2400
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Jason Baker)Geekbench 6 CPU828 / 1875
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Jason Baker)AnTuTu 11556264
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Erick Silva)AnTuTu 11599951
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-28 (Breno)AnTuTu 11614247
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (JΓ£o)AnTuTu 11579715
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 750G and Snapdragon 695

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 570 Gold (Cortex-A77)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 570 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache 3 MB -
Process 8 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 800 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 256
FLOPS 409.6 Gigaflops 430.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 694 Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 32MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X52 Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 1500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2020 October 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7225 SM6375
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2486 (33.9%)
4856 (66.1%)
Total votes: 7342

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 750G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Sysadmin for SoC May 25, 2023 at 11:00 AM
My 6 year old Redmi S2 (Y2) with a SD-625 can record 4k videos. The SD-695 really is pathetic.
+127 Reply
Avatar
Nameless. February 11, 2023 at 09:25 PM
So Qualcomm downgraded the 750G to the 695 which does not support 4K multimedia.
+143 Reply
Avatar
Rad April 15, 2024 at 02:42 AM
Supports 4K but does not capture it
+1 Reply
Avatar
blue August 6, 2022 at 09:32 AM
What percent of users really use 4K on a regular basis to watch videos on a 1080p screen?
+87 Reply
Avatar
kan November 7, 2022 at 08:05 PM
4k videos do often look better than 1080p videos on 1080p screens, probably due to some quality loss on the videos.
+25 Reply
Avatar
M.S. November 22, 2022 at 01:55 PM
kan, Yes, the bitrate of 4k and 2k is higher. So you may see a video of the same resolution but a higher bitrate, meaning better colors etc.
+12 Reply
Avatar
I just know December 9, 2022 at 10:34 AM
In any given case, 4K looks sharper compared to 1080p regardless of display resolution.
+17 Reply
Avatar
Sam February 15, 2023 at 04:34 PM
I believe yours is the wrong question. The correct question is, "With enough horsepower at its disposal, why would Qualcomm force a decision like this onto users? And snatch their choice.." 1080p might do the job, but you must give choice when it's easy to give...
+18 Reply
Avatar
ChippuShorteji March 1, 2022 at 03:06 AM
I pick 695 because of Bluetooth 5.2 but they are very on par, 750 has a better isp.
+96 Reply