Exynos 1280 vs Snapdragon 750G

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1280 (with Mali-G68 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1280
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 8 nm)
  • Announced 1-year and 6-months later
  • Higher GPU frequency (~21%)
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 5%) AnTuTu 9 score – 408K vs 389K
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
  • Developers optimize games for Snapdragon processors more often than for Exynos

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
408950
CPU 116214 118893
GPU 116279 94482
Memory 75097 70240
UX 100757 104475
Total score 408950 389046

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Image compression - 120.9 Mpixels/s
Face detection - 18.2 images/s
Speech recognition - 30.3 words/s
Machine learning - 26.5 images/s
Camera shooting - 18.7 images/s
HTML 5 - 2.34 Mnodes/s
SQLite - 614.1 Krows/s

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Exynos 1280 +258%
2287
Stability 99% 99%
Graphics test 13 FPS 3 FPS
Score 2287 639

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 58 FPS
[High]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 37 FPS
[High]
Fortnite - 28 FPS
[Medium]
Shadowgun Legends - 61 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 56 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1280 and Snapdragon 750G

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 570 Gold (Cortex-A77)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 570 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set - ARMv8.3-A
Process 5 nanometers 8 nanometers
TDP - 5 W

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 Adreno 619
Architecture Valhall 2 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 1000 MHz 825 MHz
Execution units 4 2
Shading units 48 128
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth - 17 Gbit/s
Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 694
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP 1x 192MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem - X52
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 1200 Mbps Up to 1200 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 200 Mbps Up to 210 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2022 September 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E8825 SM7225
Official page Samsung Exynos 1280 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1469 (77.5%)
426 (22.5%)
Total votes: 1895

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 750G and Exynos 1280, or ask any questions
Avatar
Harkirat singh 25 April 2022 10:48
Hello guys I want tell you something that the Antutu given of both chipsets is wrong as the ANTUTU =CPU score + GPU score +Memory score + UX score.... And the difference of both's ANTUTU is 4683 and it's not a huge difference between them ..... Thanx guys for reading this..
+110 Reply
Avatar
Conlex 01 April 2022 15:40
A52 is a better choice considering its performance is nearly the same as the A53, headphone jack, almost the same screen time, and cheaper.
+57 Reply
Avatar
WeiszGuy 05 April 2022 17:15
Here in the US, for the models that work on both wireless versions that we have, the A53 at $449 is actually cheaper than the A52 at $499. I'll take the newer CPU and GPU for less money.
+19 Reply
Avatar
Stefan 13 April 2022 16:13
WeiszGuy, Bro, go on Amazon, there are the A52s selling for around €310, which doesn't come anywhere close to the 778g, like nah, this year you'd be better off with an S21 fe which is on amazon comes at around €530 so yh...
+24 Reply
Avatar
Who? 27 March 2022 22:40
Galaxy A53 processor (Exynos 1280), Compared to its previous-gen, A52 (Snapdragon 750g), has seen significant improvements in different areas such as lithography, CPU and GPU frequency, memory type, and Bluetooth version. But as long as the A52s are available on the market, it isn't worth buying. We look forward to releasing A53s to make a more fair judgment.
+70 Reply
Avatar
Stefan 13 April 2022 16:16
The only reason they created the A52s, is because chips were in shortage as the 720G(in Europe) and 750G(In the US), so they made the a52s to satisfy Samsung users, but man why do they make the same phone, and put a more powerful chip for the people in the US? Like how if can you put a 750G in the US phones and a 720G in Europe, like nah mate, you get a pass from me.
+23 Reply
Avatar
Anonymous 19 July 2022 20:36
Stefan, What do you mean? The A52 4G has 720G, and the A52 5G has 750G. Both are available in Europe.
+5 Reply
Promotion