Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 765G vs Dimensity 800U – what's better?

Snapdragon 765G vs Dimensity 800U

Snapdragon 765G
VS
Dimensity 800U
Snapdragon 765G
Dimensity 800U

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (with Adreno 620 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 800U (Mali-G57 MP3). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (5)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  • Performs 2.9x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 6%) AnTuTu 11 score – 597K vs 562K
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  • Higher GPU frequency (~13%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 765G
vs
Dimensity 800U

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 765G +6%
597974
Dimensity 800U
562447
CPU 225992 214860
GPU 68730 60564
Memory 118245 124551
UX 185007 162472
Total score 597974 562447
Samples [11 tests] Less than 3
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 87.8 MB/sec 98.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 46.3 pages/sec 49.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 61.6 Mpixels/sec 56.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 34.9 images/sec 36.8 images/sec
HDR 55.6 Mpixels/sec 59.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.41 images/sec 5.26 images/sec
Photo processing 15.9 images/sec 11 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.58 Mpixels/sec 2.64 Mpixels/sec
Samples 6 tests 45 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 1.85 images/sec 2.93 images/sec
Face detection 0.88 images/sec 1.5 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.14 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 3.33 Gpixels/sec 5.33 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 206.3 FPS 302.6 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 4 tests -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 446 475
Stability 99% 99%
Graphics test 2 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 6739 5081
Video editing score 5699 5544
Data manipulation score 7976 7073
Photo editing score 19870 13097
Writing score 11348 7692
Phones tested Less than 3 -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 57 FPS
[High]		 44 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 38 FPS
[Ultra]		 47 FPS
[Medium]
Fortnite 29 FPS
[Medium]		 28 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]		 39 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS
[Ultra]		 51 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 35 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 55 FPS
[Ultra]		 55 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
1080 x 2400		 Oppo Realme 7 5G
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-07 (Gruk)AnTuTu 11641913
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-06 (Gruk)AnTuTu 11641913
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-23 (Guitar91)AnTuTu 11622520
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-29 (mxrcovx13)AnTuTu 11571064
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-22 (Artreg)AnTuTu 11566323
Add View all (12)
MediaTek Dimensity 800U
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-09 (Biki)AnTuTu 11562447
Add View all (1)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 765G and Dimensity 800U

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76)
1x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W -
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 620 Mali-G57 MP3
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 750 MHz 850 MHz
Pipelines 2 3
Shading units 192 32
Total shaders 384 96
FLOPS 480 Gigaflops 163.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 696 MediaTek APU 3.0
NPU theoretical performance - 2.4 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 17.07 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 3200 x 1800 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP 1x 64MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem X52 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced December 2019 August 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7250-AB MT6853T
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G official site MediaTek Dimensity 800U official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1786 (29.1%)
4349 (70.9%)
Total votes: 6135

Related Comparisons

1. MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (4)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs MediaTek Helio G99
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 800U and Snapdragon 765G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
jenkins from europe April 25, 2025 at 11:49 AM
I use my 800U on my phone, which is now 3 years old, and I have a lot of apps, like over 90. I tweaked the battery usage settings, even in developer options, and I managed to make the battery last longer. For example, before I did optimization, it used 2-3% per hour when not used (sleep mode, not turned off), and now, after I did optimizations, it uses 1% per hour when in sleep mode. I think that every phone can use less battery if you optimize the battery usage for every app you downloaded. I also turned off Google diagnostics information collection and sending, which eats battery, and I deleted the AD-ID on my Google account. I think that also lowers battery usage because Google won't collect and send data of my phone usage to every single company, lol. I hope this advice helps.
0 Reply
Avatar
Shetani March 28, 2023 at 03:05 PM
I'm just surprised to see MTK with over 70% votes with a very similar performance.
+16 Reply
Avatar
Shlddnmy May 18, 2021 at 12:07 AM
The only problem of mediatek CPU is Battery Life.
+174 Reply
Avatar
DDDD November 24, 2021 at 11:04 PM
The only problem of Shitdragon CPU is Battery Life.
+22 Reply
Avatar
Hater January 13, 2022 at 12:01 PM
DDDD, Imagine getting butthurt over a simple criticism that is true at the time of the comment. Listen. You are not the creator of MediaTek. No one but you cares about your situation. Snapdragon is worse. So what? Mediatek is worse. So what? Neither matters. You're being BUTT HURT over insecurity that you're forced to use MediaTek in your life because of your circumstances. Both are good, stop insulting products.
+15 Reply
EnglishРусский