Snapdragon 765G vs Snapdragon 695

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (with Adreno 620 graphics) and Snapdragon 695 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 7 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~12%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
597974
CPU 225992 237904
GPU 68730 56314
Memory 118245 136317
UX 185007 161480
Total score 597974 592015
Samples [11 tests] [83 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 87.8 MB/sec 102.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 46.3 pages/sec 55.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 61.6 Mpixels/sec 72.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 34.9 images/sec 40.7 images/sec
HDR 55.6 Mpixels/sec 61.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.41 images/sec 5.46 images/sec
Photo processing 15.9 images/sec 19.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.58 Mpixels/sec 2.67 Mpixels/sec
Samples 6 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 1.85 images/sec 2.26 images/sec
Face detection 0.88 images/sec 0.98 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 3.33 Gpixels/sec 4.35 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 206.3 FPS 245.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 4 tests 23 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 446 360
Stability 99% 98%
Graphics test 2 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 6739 9704
Video editing score 5699 3911
Data manipulation score 7976 8663
Photo editing score 19870 18151
Writing score 11348 13129
Phones tested Less than 3 21 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 57 FPS
[High]
66 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 38 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite 29 FPS
[Medium]
24 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS
[Ultra]
57 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 19 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 55 FPS
[Ultra]
42 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
1080 x 2400
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-07 (Gruk)AnTuTu 11641913
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-06 (Gruk)AnTuTu 11641913
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-23 (Guitar91)AnTuTu 11622520
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-29 (mxrcovx13)AnTuTu 11571064
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-22 (Artreg)AnTuTu 11566323
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 765G and Snapdragon 695

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76)
1x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 7 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 620 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 750 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 192 128
Total shaders 384 256
FLOPS 480 Gigaflops 430.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 696 Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 3200 x 1800 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X52 Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 1500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2019 October 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7250-AB SM6375
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1280 (36.1%)
2264 (63.9%)
Total votes: 3544

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 765G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
4k recording January 10, 2025 at 08:59 AM
I wonder how many people care about 4k recording? I noticed that many newer midrange budget socs got that feature cut out when it was present many years ago. This is good example. I had budget Motorola with 4k Moto G 5G Plus and now phones in same price range hardly supports anything more then HD. Why is that?
0 Reply
Avatar
Jimster480 May 4, 2023 at 08:34 AM
Honestly the name of the SoC really only reflects its CPU performance. Between the lack of Wifi 6, lack of 4K Video support, and 1 less execution unit; the rest of the SoC is quite cut down vs the 700 series other than the CPU cores despite being years newer.
+53 Reply
Avatar
taruga February 28, 2023 at 01:50 AM
765G better overall chipset with 4K recording and better GPU
+110 Reply
Avatar
Brakille March 14, 2022 at 04:26 PM
Snapdragon 695 is more like 495 or something. They gave it a pretty good processor but a crappy GPU.
+502 Reply