Exynos 1610 vs Exynos 1330

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1610 (with Mali-G68 MP4 graphics) and Exynos 1330 (Mali-G68 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
608564
607489
CPU 262139 274218
GPU 42910 42656
Memory 111676 107262
UX 191839 183353
Total score 608564 607489
Samples Less than 3 [25 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression - 107 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser - 59.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer - 65.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection - 41 images/sec
HDR - 57.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur - 6.33 images/sec
Photo processing - 10.6 images/sec
Ray tracing - 3.43 Mpixels/sec
Samples - 10 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
1304
Background blur - 1.94 images/sec
Face detection - 0.95 images/sec
Horizon detection - 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection - 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur - 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching - 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching - 3.73 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics - 221.7 FPS
API - OpenCL
Samples - 3 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 139
Stability - 97%
Graphics test - 1 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 364
Stability - 97%
Graphics test - 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 10836
Video editing score - 6753
Data manipulation score - 9036
Photo editing score - 20957
Writing score - 16436
Phones tested - 3 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1610
No benchmark results yet
Samsung Exynos 1330
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (Đỗ Đông Điền)AnTuTu632633
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-29 (Điền)AnTuTu516874
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1286
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU960 / 1826
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (NonameD)AnTuTu652673

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1610 and Exynos 1330

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 5 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 5 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP4 Mali-G68 MP2
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency - 949 MHz
Pipelines 4 2
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 128 64
FLOPS - 121.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance - 4.9 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support - LTE Cat. 18
5G support No Yes
Download speed - Up to 2550 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 1280 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced September 2026 February 2023
Class Mid range Low end
Model number - S5E8535
Official page - Samsung Exynos 1330 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
5 (45.5%)
6 (54.5%)
Total votes: 11

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 1330 and Exynos 1610, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
QorteK September 17, 2026 at 07:36 AM
Samsung joins the nonsense rebranding game with Exynos 1610!
0 Reply