Samsung Exynos 1330 – an 8-core chipset that was announced on February 23, 2023, and is manufactured using a 5-nanometer process technology. It has 2 cores Cortex-A78 at 2400 MHz and 6 cores Cortex-A55 at 2000 MHz.
Review
CPU Performance
28
Gaming Performance
6
Battery life
84
NanoReview Score
32
Compare Samsung Exynos 1330 with other SoCs
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks
AnTuTu 11
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
GPU frequency 1000 -> 949 MHz
Shading units 64 -> 32
Total shaders 160 -> 64
FLOPS 128 -> 121.5 Gigaflops
+10Reply
Help!January 18, 2025 at 08:52 PM
Believe me , this processor is very bad in terms of 5g network usage . Where the 5g network is relatively low other processors will stick to it , but my F14 5g phone with this processor switch to 4g and remains 4g . If i force it to 5g network it performs very bad amd heats up to 48°C with in 10 minutes of 5g usage .
+28Reply
KauçukSeptember 23, 2024 at 10:10 AM
The new A16 speculated to use this chip or 6080. Compared to the older 5G chip 6100+ this is a pretty decent upgrade as I wasn't even expecting them to change the chip at all as A15 was such a leap from A14 (Amoled and 40% brighter screen, a chip that's 55% better, 25W charging and so on).
Gaming wise this chip doesn't have anything exciting to offer, infact, the manufacturing being Samsung very likely going to cause throtling due to heat but I believe the higher CPU score and 5nm manufacturing here will amend that.
+13Reply
ZymbiaDecember 12, 2023 at 12:44 PM
Nanoreview should list this chip as a Low-end chip not a mid-range chip because only 3 low-end phones use this chip (A14 5g, M14 and F14).
+41Reply
KernDecember 14, 2023 at 12:14 AM
Just because it's used in low-end phones doesn't mean its performance is also low-end. I find it slightly faster for a low-end chip. This chip outperforms every Mediatek Helio Series chip (whether G or Non-G), except for the Helio G99, with which it closely competes. The way it handles games, even on high-quality screens, is quite impressive for such a low-end chip. Not to mention, it scores over 400k in the Antutu benchmark. I doubt there's any low-end chip that can achieve this score. I think the Exynos 1330 is more of a lower mid-range chip.
+38Reply
ZymbiaJanuary 8, 2024 at 01:51 AM
Kern, I never said that the chip has a low-end performance. Instead, I wanted to clarify to the NanoReview team that the chip is primarily used in low-end phones. Regardless, this chip is criminally underrated. Budget phones, such as the M14, can be comparable to a mid-range Snapdragon chip, like the 695 (which is overused and overrated, by the way) that is used in more expensive phones.
+12Reply
KernJanuary 15, 2024 at 03:28 AM
Zymbia, The Exynos 1330 was indeed designed to replace the Exynos 850 in most budget devices. Its inclusion of dual Cortex-A78 cores and a faster, sub-premium 2-core GPU equips it with improved performance capabilities. In my experience with the Galaxy A14 5G, it has managed to handle nearly all applications and games with no crashes so far. Even for a budget device, that's certainly impressive.
+12Reply
LopJanuary 19, 2024 at 01:33 PM
Kern, I don't believe they created it to replace the E850. The differences are substantial. The E850 can't even compete with a Helio P65, while the E1330 can outperform any Helio series chip. Additionally, it can rival the D900 in terms of CPU, and surpass the D810 in GPU.
+11Reply
KernJanuary 20, 2024 at 09:05 PM
Lop, I'm discussing the fact that both chipsets are used in budget devices, despite the Exynos 1330 offering superior performance than the Exynos 850. Regardless of whether it's a replacement or not, in any case, it's still an upgrade over the other.
+11Reply
KauçukSeptember 16, 2024 at 03:32 PM
Kern, Deeming this chip to be midrange is like saying snapdragon 845 is a midrange chip. Its entirely dependent to the period the chip was released. 450K scoring chip from 2017 will be a flagship, 450K scoring chip from 2023 will be a budget one especially with the subpar GPU score for our day and age (I don't say the chip is bad, I say its a low end chip)
+1Reply
KernOctober 14, 2024 at 07:32 PM
Kauçuk, Except that this site still consider the Mediatek Dimensity 6000 Series chips as mid-range chipsets and the Exynos 1330 is not that far off from their performance. Though the E1330 has Cortex-A78 cores vs. Cortex-A76 cores and an up to date Mali GPU that gives at least similar or better GFLOPS of performance as in those MTK chipsets. Not that I'm not listening to you but is who to believe.
0Reply
KernOctober 17, 2024 at 05:37 AM
Kern, Also, i said that the E1330 should've been a lower-midrange chipset, not the standard midrange type.
0Reply
KernOctober 20, 2023 at 03:40 AM
The Exynos 1330 chipset offers impressive high performance, especially considering its budget-friendly price. It is miles ahead of the Helio P22 chipset, which was in my previous device, the A10s, in both application usage and gaming. I currently own a Galaxy A14 5G, which features this Exynos 1330 chipset. The device ensures smooth gameplay with Asphalt 9 on a 60Hz screen, while maintaining a warm, not hot, temperature. The internet speed is so fast that I can watch 1080p content without any major issues. It was definitely worth upgrading from the A10s to the A14 5G.
+61Reply
MikeAugust 25, 2023 at 01:47 AM
The Exynos 1330 and the Exynos 980 are highly underrated chips, often dismissed simply because they're Exynos models. The Exynos 1330 actually outperforms both the Snapdragon 695 and the 4 Gen 1, and it's found in budget phones like the A14 5G and M14 5G.
The Exynos 980 is also seriously underrated. While many criticize the A53 chip as being a downgrade from the A52s, there's noticeably less outcry about the A52 5G (not to be confused with the A52s) being a step back from the A51 5G. The Exynos 980 is superior to both the SD765G and SD750G. The bias against Exynos in favor of Snapdragon is quite evident; the level of disdain towards Exynos is rather extreme.
+144Reply
KauçukSeptember 16, 2024 at 03:43 PM
They are known to heat lot more than both Snapdragon and Mediatek and also are visibilly less optimised. For instance Exynos 1380 was 10% stronger on paper but visibilly weaker on real life use despite the it being a 2023 chip. Imagine how worse the older chipsets were (or don't, we have seen it well on A33/53/S20 and so on).
I actually want exynos to be a good chip as there will be more Samsung options for us and a phone manufacturer using their own chip means better optimization, performance, battery life and so on. They still seem yet to achieve this despite years of experience chip manufacturing. I geniuely have no idea whats up. Mediatek used to smell doodoo fart, now they are quite good at what they are doing. Unisoc seems to catch up a bit with their CPU's that are getting 400K~ now.
