Exynos 1330 vs Dimensity 6100 Plus

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1330 (with Mali-G68 MP2 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1330
  • Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17.07 GB/s)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 6 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 18%) AnTuTu 11 score – 607K vs 513K
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
607489
CPU 274218 203380
GPU 42656 42600
Memory 107262 116281
UX 183353 151548
Total score 607489 513809
Samples [25 tests] [16 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 107 MB/sec 93.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 59.9 pages/sec 49 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 65.3 Mpixels/sec 66.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 41 images/sec 38.2 images/sec
HDR 57.2 Mpixels/sec 61.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.33 images/sec 5.65 images/sec
Photo processing 10.6 images/sec 17.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.43 Mpixels/sec 2.93 Mpixels/sec
Samples 10 tests 12 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 1.94 images/sec 1.77 images/sec
Face detection 0.95 images/sec 0.88 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 3.73 Gpixels/sec 3.63 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 221.7 FPS 217.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 3 tests 7 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 139 134
Stability 97% -
Graphics test 1 FPS 1 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 364 -
Stability 97% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 10836 8095
Video editing score 6753 4402
Data manipulation score 9036 6820
Photo editing score 20957 19144
Writing score 16436 11954
Phones tested 3 models 8 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1330
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (Đỗ Đông Điền)AnTuTu632633
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-29 (Điền)AnTuTu516874
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1286
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU960 / 1826
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (NonameD)AnTuTu652673
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1245
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU675 / 1791
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 (Gota)GeekBench CPU675 / 1957
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-18 (PG)AnTuTu546817
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-06 (Walid)AnTuTu551605

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1330 and Dimensity 6100 Plus

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 5 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W -
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP2 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 949 MHz 962 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 64 64
FLOPS 121.5 Gigaflops 123.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 4.9 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 17.07 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2550 Mbps Up to 3300 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced February 2023 July 2023
Class Low end Mid range
Model number S5E8535 MT6835, MT6835V/ZA, MT8755V/TZB
Official page Samsung Exynos 1330 official site MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 6400

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
921 (78.5%)
252 (21.5%)
Total votes: 1173

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 6100 Plus and Exynos 1330, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Orion April 10, 2025 at 12:07 PM
Exynos 1330 total shaders is wrong
+3 Reply
Serhii April 11, 2025 at 08:04 AM
Thank you for a comment.
+3 Reply
Avatar
Rohit November 25, 2024 at 06:10 AM
I once used Exynos , will keep on using
+9 Reply
Avatar
Rohit April 13, 2024 at 03:15 PM
The Exynos 1330 is one of the best low-budget mobile processors. Despite its low GPU ratings, it can still handle heavy games like DLS 2024 and NBA Mobile Live. It's one of Samsung's top processors.
+88 Reply
Avatar
Anies Imin February 21, 2024 at 12:09 PM
It Doesn't Make Sense! They're only one generation apart, bro! LPDDR5 vs. LPDDR4X? G68 MP2 vs. G57 MP2? Cortex A78 vs. Cortex A76? Is Samsung to blame? Their Exynos SOC is known for poor optimization.
+172 Reply
Avatar
Rohit May 17, 2024 at 08:14 AM
Yeah, bro, that's true. But still, it makes a difference and moreover, Exynos is a great processor. Just see Exynos 2200.
+48 Reply