Exynos 1330 vs Snapdragon 695

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1330 (with Mali G68 MP2 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.


General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1330
  • Announced 1-year and 4-months later
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 6 nm)
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 2x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 9%) AnTuTu 9 score – 396K vs 364K


Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
CPU 129193 123304
GPU 60021 99867
Memory 75128 62022
UX 101477 112392
Total score 364955 396721

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score


A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Stability - 99%
Graphics test 8 FPS 7 FPS
Score 1385 1199


Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 66 FPS
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
Fortnite - 24 FPS
Shadowgun Legends - 67 FPS
World of Tanks Blitz - 57 FPS
Genshin Impact - 19 FPS
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 42 FPS
Device - Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.


Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1330 and Snapdragon 695


Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 5 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP 7 W 4 W


GPU name Mali G68 MP2 Adreno 619
Architecture Valhal 2 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 950 MHz 950 MHz
Execution units 2 2
Shading units 24 128
FLOPS 240 Gigaflops 486 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12


Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth - 17 Gbit/s
Max size 8 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 686
Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV


Modem - Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2550 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 1500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC


Announced February 2023 October 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E8535 SM6375
Official page Samsung Exynos 1330 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
998 (82%)
219 (18%)
Total votes: 1217


Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 695 and Exynos 1330, or ask any questions
Freddy 24 April 2023 08:32
Thanks for this comparative review! Now, when I buy my next phone, I'll be at the top of my game. But I have one small suggestion, especially for those of us who aren't tech-savvy: how about writing out abbreviations in full within brackets, e.g., I/O (Input/Output)? Once again, thanks for the article. I learned a lot!
+40 Reply