Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Exynos 1330 vs Snapdragon 695 – what's better?

Exynos 1330 vs Snapdragon 695

Exynos 1330
VS
Snapdragon 695
Exynos 1330
Snapdragon 695

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1330 (with Mali-G68 MP2 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (3)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1330
  • Supports 51% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17 GB/s)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 6 nm)
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~13%)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 3.5x better in floating-point computations

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Exynos 1330
vs
Snapdragon 695

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 1330 +3%
607489
Snapdragon 695
592015
CPU 274218 237904
GPU 42656 56314
Memory 107262 136317
UX 183353 161480
Total score 607489 592015
Samples [25 tests] [83 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 1330
1826
Snapdragon 695 +15%
2101
Asset compression 107 MB/sec 102.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 59.9 pages/sec 55.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 65.3 Mpixels/sec 72.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 41 images/sec 40.7 images/sec
HDR 57.2 Mpixels/sec 61.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.33 images/sec 5.46 images/sec
Photo processing 10.6 images/sec 19.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.43 Mpixels/sec 2.67 Mpixels/sec
Samples 10 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 1330
1286
Snapdragon 695 +9%
1403
Background blur 1.94 images/sec 2.26 images/sec
Face detection 0.95 images/sec 0.98 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 3.73 Gpixels/sec 4.35 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 221.7 FPS 245.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 3 tests 23 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 139 -
Stability 97% -
Graphics test 1 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 364 360
Stability 97% 98%
Graphics test 2 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Exynos 1330 +23%
11711
Snapdragon 695
9496
Web score 10836 9704
Video editing score 6753 3911
Data manipulation score 9036 8663
Photo editing score 20957 18151
Writing score 16436 13129
Phones tested 3 models 21 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 66 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite - 24 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz - 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 19 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 42 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1330
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (Đỗ Đông Điền)AnTuTu632633
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-29 (Điền)AnTuTu516874
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1286
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU960 / 1826
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (NonameD)AnTuTu652673
Add View all (31)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU917 / 1939
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-13 (Fernando)AnTuTu584675
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)GeekBench CPU907 / 2014
Add View all (111)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1330 and Snapdragon 695

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55		 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 5 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP2 Adreno 619
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Adreno 600
GPU frequency 949 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 32 128
Total shaders 64 256
FLOPS 121.5 Gigaflops 430.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 686
NPU theoretical performance 4.9 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2550 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 1500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced February 2023 October 2021
Class Low end Mid range
Model number S5E8535 SM6375
Official page Samsung Exynos 1330 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2940 (75.4%)
960 (24.6%)
Total votes: 3900

Related Comparisons

1. Samsung Exynos 1330 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (6)
2. Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
3. Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Samsung Exynos 1280 (6)
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (31)
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (1)
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (16)
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (16)
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (19)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 695 and Exynos 1330, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Desolate Intention March 2, 2025 at 03:35 PM
Can't really tell which one is better...
+7 Reply
Avatar
akp831 March 2, 2025 at 07:43 PM
Go with Exynos, despite its thermal issues it supports 4K and LPDDR5, also Faster cores and 5 nm. The extra shading units of Adreno 619 are a lie (It can hardly keep up with the Arm-Mail G57, despite having more Shaders) Snapdragon 695 is like a malware, nobody liked the Snapdragon 695 neither did they want to buy a phone with this processor, but the OEMs absolutely LOVE using Snapdragon 695 (Over 100 phones are using 695) I once used a Galaxy Tab A9+ which has 695 and I can confirm, that 695 is a cursed processor.
+20 Reply
Avatar
Freddy April 24, 2023 at 08:32 AM
Thanks for this comparative review! Now, when I buy my next phone, I'll be at the top of my game. But I have one small suggestion, especially for those of us who aren't tech-savvy: how about writing out abbreviations in full within brackets, e.g., I/O (Input/Output)? Once again, thanks for the article. I learned a lot!
+397 Reply
EnglishРусский