Exynos 980 vs Snapdragon 765G

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 980 (with Mali-G76 MP5 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (Adreno 620). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 980
  • Supports 101% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 17 GB/s)
  • Shows slightly better (up to 7%) AnTuTu 11 score – 640K vs 597K
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  • Performs 2.7x better in floating-point computations
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 8 nm)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
640617
CPU 274118 225992
GPU 61069 68730
Memory 117515 118245
UX 187915 185007
Total score 640617 597974
Samples [4 tests] [11 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
1858
Asset compression 95.1 MB/sec 87.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 36.6 pages/sec 46.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 61.6 Mpixels/sec 61.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 35.3 images/sec 34.9 images/sec
HDR 59.5 Mpixels/sec 55.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.11 images/sec 5.41 images/sec
Photo processing 15 images/sec 15.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.7 Mpixels/sec 2.58 Mpixels/sec
Samples 91 tests 6 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
1333
Background blur 2.18 images/sec 1.85 images/sec
Face detection 1.32 images/sec 0.88 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.04 Gpixels/sec 3.33 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 136.1 FPS 206.3 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples - 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 446
Stability 99% 99%
Graphics test - 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 6739
Video editing score - 5699
Data manipulation score - 7976
Photo editing score - 19870
Writing score - 11348
Phones tested - Less than 3

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 57 FPS
[High]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 38 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 29 FPS
[Medium]
Shadowgun Legends - 67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 55 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 980
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-07 (CORE CHEn)AnTuTu 11640617
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-24 -> SkyblueAnTuTu 11603944
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-07 (Gruk)AnTuTu 11641913
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-06 (Gruk)AnTuTu 11641913
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-23 (Guitar91)AnTuTu 11622520
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-29 (mxrcovx13)AnTuTu 11571064
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-22 (Artreg)AnTuTu 11566323

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 980 and Snapdragon 765G

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A77
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76)
1x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.3-A
Process 8 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W 5 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G76 MP5 Adreno 620
Architecture Bifrost 3rd gen Adreno 600
GPU frequency 728 MHz 750 MHz
Pipelines 5 2
Shading units 24 192
Total shaders 120 384
FLOPS 174.7 Gigaflops 480 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 696

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 34.1 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 3360 x 1440 3200 x 1800
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 192MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5123 X52
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3550 Mbps Up to 3700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1380 Mbps Up to 1600 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2019 December 2019
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E9630 SM7250-AB
Official page Samsung Exynos 980 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
450 (61.6%)
281 (38.4%)
Total votes: 731

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 765G and Exynos 980, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!