Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Dimensity 7300

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 (with Adreno 730 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (Mali-G615 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
  • Performs 3.4x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 62%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1420K vs 879K
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 7300
  • 28% higher CPU clock speed (3200 vs 2500 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  • Higher GPU frequency (~16%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
CPU 537485 320191
GPU 241551 128437
Memory 254727 164451
UX 387045 266635
Total score 1420808 879714
Samples [116 tests] [311 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 190.8 MB/sec 166 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 126.3 pages/sec 68.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 164.1 Mpixels/sec 114.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 114.8 images/sec 53.4 images/sec
HDR 141.5 Mpixels/sec 102.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 16 images/sec 10.7 images/sec
Photo processing 37.7 images/sec 25.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.69 Mpixels/sec 4.62 Mpixels/sec
Samples 72 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 8.63 images/sec 4.57 images/sec
Face detection 5.22 images/sec 2.52 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.35 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.43 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.43 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 24.4 Gpixels/sec 4.25 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 666.6 FPS 439.4 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 39 tests 40 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 856 346
Stability 98% 98%
Graphics test 6 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 2756 -
Stability 44% -
Graphics test 16 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 12737 13221
Video editing score 7462 6420
Data manipulation score 12439 9644
Photo editing score 32017 35886
Writing score 16257 16658
Phones tested 5 models 22 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 89 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 47 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Shadowgun Legends 114 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 120 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 56 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 58 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device ZTE Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-15 (Hekoow)AnTuTu 111406051
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-14 (Rayuthme)AnTuTu 121517844
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-13 (saabinside)AnTuTu 121446039
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 -> vvalakisAnTuTu 111397725
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (uwaiswashereagain)AnTuTu 121409462
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-16 (abedeelha)AnTuTu 121019011
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-16 (Atash)Geekbench 7 GPU2382
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-16 (Atash)Geekbench 7 CPU864 / 3176
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-15 (Atash)AnTuTu 11863556
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-15 (Atash)AnTuTu 12989820

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 and Dimensity 7300

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3200 MHz 2500 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 6 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 730 Mali-G615 MP2
Architecture Adreno 700 Valhall 4rd gen
GPU frequency 900 MHz 1047 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 512 128
Total shaders 1024 256
FLOPS 1843.2 Gigaflops 536.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek APU 655

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X65 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 10000 Mbps Up to 3270 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2022 June 2024
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number SM8475 MT6878 MT6878V/ZA MT6878V_A/ZA
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 official site MediaTek Dimensity 7300 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 7400

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
51 (96.2%)
2 (3.8%)
Total votes: 53

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7300 and Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Jemek August 14, 2025 at 01:40 PM
These are different Chips but seeing that Motorola Thinkphone is (at least in Poland) cheaper than Edge 50 Neo, shows that an older flagship SoC (and phone) are still flagship years later.
0 Reply