Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Dimensity 7300 vs Dimensity 7200 – what's better?

Dimensity 7300 vs Dimensity 7200

Dimensity 7300
VS
Dimensity 7200
Dimensity 7300
Dimensity 7200

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (with Mali-G615 MP2 graphics) and Dimensity 7200 (Mali-G610 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Specs
  7. Comments (24)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  • 12% higher CPU clock speed (2800 vs 2500 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Higher GPU frequency (~8%)
  • Shows better (up to 10%) AnTuTu 11 score – 971K vs 879K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Dimensity 7300
vs
Dimensity 7200

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Dimensity 7300
879714
Dimensity 7200 +10%
971424
CPU 320191 362430
GPU 128437 148984
Memory 164451 169068
UX 266635 290942
Total score 879714 971424
Samples [311 tests] [37 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 166 MB/sec 127.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 68.3 pages/sec 73.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 114.8 Mpixels/sec 86.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 53.4 images/sec 42.2 images/sec
HDR 102.1 Mpixels/sec 76.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.7 images/sec 8.69 images/sec
Photo processing 25.8 images/sec 21.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.62 Mpixels/sec 3.36 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 7 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 4.57 images/sec 5.06 images/sec
Face detection 2.52 images/sec 2.89 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.12 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.17 Gpixels/sec 0.25 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.12 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.25 Gpixels/sec 10.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 439.4 FPS 909.5 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 40 tests 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 346 447
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 3 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 1158
Stability - 99%
Graphics test - 6 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 13221 -
Video editing score 6420 -
Data manipulation score 9644 -
Photo editing score 35886 -
Writing score 16658 -
Phones tested 22 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Антон)AnTuTu 121010952
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-01 (Chelik)AnTuTu 121005243
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Keyn)AnTuTu 12994900
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (АлСксСй)AnTuTu 12898347
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Fabricy)Geekbench 7 GPU2511
Add View all (362)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Kaiser)AnTuTu 121001163
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Vedurijuht2425)AnTuTu 121045921
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (Tushar Ranjan Sharma)AnTuTu 11980070
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-25 (PratikπŸ‘€πŸ’—)AnTuTu 11964788
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-16 (Mushraf)AnTuTu 111003769
Add View all (43)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 7300 and Dimensity 7200

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55		 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2500 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
L1 cache 512 KB 512 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G615 MP2 Mali-G610 MP4
Architecture Valhall 4rd gen Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 1047 MHz 1130 MHz
Pipelines 2 4
Shading units 128 64
Total shaders 256 256
FLOPS 536.1 Gigaflops 578.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 655 MediaTek APU 650

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3		 - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support - LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3270 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced June 2024 February 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6878 MT6878V/ZA MT6878V_A/ZA MT6886
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 7300 official site MediaTek Dimensity 7200 official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 7400 - MediaTek Dimensity 7400

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
807 (26.4%)
2250 (73.6%)
Total votes: 3057

Related Comparisons

1. MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (2)
2. MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (12)
3. MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (12)
4. MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (14)
5. MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7400 (29)
6. MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (1)
7. MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (2)
8. MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (2)
9. MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (2)
10. MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7200 and Dimensity 7300, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Insane Insane April 18, 2025 at 04:17 AM
What is this downgrade but at least got energy efficiency.
+15 Reply
Avatar
Margos January 16, 2025 at 07:31 AM
Only 3 Watts TDP in Dimensity 7300 is Really amazing . I will consider it because of the efficiency . And the power is very balanced considering it's price .
+41 Reply
Avatar
SnapdiaTek fan November 8, 2024 at 05:19 AM
It seems DM7300 doesn't have the peak power of the DM7200 with its newer A715 cores which is 2 gens away from the A78. DM7300: - Way efficient at only 3Watts TDP - Less powerful but runs cooler on longer usage DM7200 - Slightly powerful but consumes a lot power at 5W TDP - Will consume more battery in the long run just like how 8gen1 vs 8+gen1 is.
+48 Reply
Avatar
Karan August 27, 2024 at 11:56 AM
It has come to my attention that some companies exploit naming conventions to mislead users into associating higher numbers with better performance. This tactic can result in consumers purchasing subpar processors under the illusion of superior quality. Let’s remain vigilant and ensure we educate our audience on distinguishing genuine performance metrics from marketing gimmicks. LOL
+35 Reply
Avatar
kitler March 12, 2025 at 01:47 PM
still you gotta admit 7300 phones are cheaper than 7200 ones.So people arent getting completely scammed fortunately
+11 Reply
Avatar
hate exynos :)) August 4, 2024 at 04:52 PM
the cpu might be better on 7300 since cortex a78 and cortex a55 is way more efficiency than their brother a715 and a510, so it will run cooler and eat less power, it just doesnt have the peak performance of the later core. but on the gpu side, it is a shame that they downgrade the performance of the 7300
+54 Reply
Avatar
G dr July 25, 2024 at 12:19 AM
7300 is amezing only 3 watts its best power efiicant sos
+45 Reply
Avatar
Human July 16, 2024 at 02:25 PM
I don't know why they named it 7300 instead of 7120 or 7150. Maybe?
+79 Reply
Avatar
Ucoxz July 15, 2024 at 01:02 PM
Wow downgrade from previous version
+26 Reply
Avatar
Robin August 29, 2024 at 04:07 AM
Ya bro downgrade It is their regular program. Some youtubers say that it is a good chipset and will support 90 fps in bgmi game. πŸ₯΄
+27 Reply
Avatar
Boom November 27, 2024 at 11:13 AM
Robin, Now it's supporting 120 fps in bgmi πŸ«₯
+15 Reply
Avatar
kitler March 12, 2025 at 01:48 PM
Robin, it will maybe after some updates
+1 Reply
Avatar
fanboii l July 8, 2024 at 10:28 PM
What is this lol we went from getting huge upgrades each year to then minor to stale and now straight-up downgrades wow
+23 Reply
Avatar
Suit July 5, 2024 at 03:59 AM
Dimensity 7300 is more like Dimensity 7030 but with a newer GPU in it.
+18 Reply
Avatar
noname June 29, 2024 at 05:24 AM
7300 has antutu score closer to 670k or 680k not 730k, its worse than 7200
+25 Reply
Avatar
Champagnepapi (DRAKE) July 5, 2024 at 06:39 AM
bro which is better for gaming 7300 or 7200.(EFOOTBALL 60FPS & HIGH SETTINGS)
+96 Reply
Avatar
Jayanta Bhowmick July 8, 2024 at 02:48 PM
Champagnepapi (DRAKE), dimensity 7200 is better for gaming,but please check ufs and ram version for gaming
+11 Reply
Avatar
Villain July 13, 2024 at 02:29 PM
Champagnepapi (DRAKE), 7200 is far better than garbage 7300
+12 Reply
Avatar
KAran August 27, 2024 at 11:51 AM
Champagnepapi (DRAKE), I don't think these two processors can provide hardcore gaming. You should go for SD 8Gen 3 or MDK 9300 or A17, that's enough. If possible, then go for iQOO 12 Pro. Beast for Gamers.
+4 Reply
Avatar
NoName June 27, 2024 at 07:51 AM
Dimensity 7300 has G615MC2 not G615MC6
+39 Reply
Avatar
Anonymous June 27, 2024 at 04:56 AM
Misleading name. 7300 is a garbage name. How can a company design SoC but can't come up with logical naming scheme for its products.
+48 Reply
Avatar
Sumit July 3, 2024 at 04:54 PM
Dimensity is doing this for a very long time Don't forget that dimensity 6080 was better than 6100
+31 Reply
Avatar
Anonymous July 9, 2024 at 12:25 PM
Seriously, almost every big tech brand has this problem Sony Nikon Nothing etc
+13 Reply
Avatar
Size August 2, 2024 at 11:27 AM
Sumit, That's right, D6080 is rebranded from D810
+15 Reply
EnglishРусский