Unisoc T9100 vs Exynos 1480

We compared two 8-core processors: Unisoc T9100 (with Mali-G57 MP4 graphics) and Samsung Exynos 1480 (Samsung Xclipse 530). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1480
  • Performs 3.3x better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~67%)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
  • Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17.07 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 41%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1021K vs 723K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
723825
1021736
CPU 292879 348485
GPU 61687 226076
Memory 147055 182794
UX 222204 264381
Total score 723825 1021736
Samples [11 tests] [38 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1137
Multi-Core Score
3437
Asset compression 134.1 MB/sec 174.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 51.9 pages/sec 84.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 85.6 Mpixels/sec 127.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 41.7 images/sec 65.6 images/sec
HDR 75.1 Mpixels/sec 109.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 8.19 images/sec 12.5 images/sec
Photo processing 20.3 images/sec 31.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.09 Mpixels/sec 5.04 Mpixels/sec
Samples Less than 3 19 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
4101
Background blur 4.54 images/sec 7.73 images/sec
Face detection 1.97 images/sec 3.62 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 10.4 Gpixels/sec 16.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 398.1 FPS 426.8 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 2 tests 11 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
459
Score 233 459
Stability 97% 98%
Graphics test 2 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 982
Stability - 98%
Graphics test - 5 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
14140
13134
Web score 14936 11788
Video editing score 7599 7255
Data manipulation score 9940 10941
Photo editing score 32237 23283
Writing score 15432 17673
Phones tested Less than 3 Less than 3

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Unisoc T9100
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (Vinnzzx67)AnTuTu 12821056
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> ChizuAnTuTu 11746898
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-22 (Firdausss)AnTuTu 11754254
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 -> Gil_lipata33AnTuTu 11723825
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (Zypher)AnTuTu 11723825
Samsung Exynos 1480
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-17 (АртСм)AnTuTu 111080442
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> SKLeoAnTuTu 111062044
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (No)AnTuTu 11965699
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Brice)Geekbench 6 CPU1115 / 3126
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-06 (Mazen)AnTuTu 111057022

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Unisoc T9100 and Exynos 1480

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.7 GHz – Cortex-A76
3x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2700 MHz 2750 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 6 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G57 MP4 Samsung Xclipse 530
Architecture Valhall 1st gen RDNA 2
GPU frequency 780 MHz 1300 MHz
Pipelines 4 1
Shading units 32 128
Total shaders 128 128
FLOPS 199.7 Gigaflops 665.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 8 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17.07 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 32 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3440 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed - Up to 5100 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 1280 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced March 2025 March 2024
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number - S5E8845
Official page Unisoc T9100 official site Samsung Exynos 1480 official site
Successor - - Samsung Exynos 1580
Further details
Notes on Unisoc T9100:
    - It's just rebranded Unisoc T820 chip.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1 (7.7%)
12 (92.3%)
Total votes: 13

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 1480 and Unisoc T9100, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!