Exynos 1480 vs Snapdragon 778G

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1480 (with Samsung Xclipse 530 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (Adreno 642). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1480
  • Higher GPU frequency (~2.4x)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 30%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1021K vs 783K
  • Performs 18% better in floating-point computations
  • 15% higher CPU clock speed (2750 vs 2400 MHz)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1021736
CPU 348485 326426
GPU 226076 101452
Memory 182794 119484
UX 264381 236244
Total score 1021736 783606
Samples [38 tests] [113 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1137
Multi-Core Score
3437
Asset compression 174.3 MB/sec 157.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 84.2 pages/sec 70.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 127.9 Mpixels/sec 113.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 65.6 images/sec 55.4 images/sec
HDR 109.3 Mpixels/sec 91.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.5 images/sec 11.1 images/sec
Photo processing 31.3 images/sec 26.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.04 Mpixels/sec 4.17 Mpixels/sec
Samples 19 tests 68 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
4101
Background blur 7.73 images/sec 3.5 images/sec
Face detection 3.62 images/sec 1.57 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.14 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.2 Gpixels/sec 5.75 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 426.8 FPS 370.4 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 11 tests 26 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 459 225
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 3 FPS 2 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 982 686
Stability 98% 99%
Graphics test 5 FPS 4 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
13134
Web score 11788 10945
Video editing score 7255 6994
Data manipulation score 10941 9642
Photo editing score 23283 24463
Writing score 17673 14285
Phones tested Less than 3 11 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 59 FPS
[High]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 42 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 27 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 49 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 94 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 53 FPS
[High]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Oppo Realme GT Master Edition
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1480
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-17 (АртСм)AnTuTu 111080442
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> SKLeoAnTuTu 111062044
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (No)AnTuTu 11965699
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Brice)Geekbench 6 CPU1115 / 3126
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-06 (Mazen)AnTuTu 111057022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (deramen)AnTuTu 12880897
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 -> FlopsAnTuTu 12831230
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Bunny)Geekbench 7 GPU1188
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Bunny)Geekbench 7 CPU663 / 2476
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Bunny)Geekbench 7 CPU663 / 2476

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1480 and Snapdragon 778G

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2750 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.4-A
L2 cache - 2 MB
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 5 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 530 Adreno 642
Architecture RDNA 2 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 550 MHz
Pipelines 1 2
Shading units 128 256
Total shaders 128 512
FLOPS 665.6 Gigaflops 563.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 770

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 192MP, 2x 36MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - X53
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5100 Mbps Up to 3700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 1600 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2024 May 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E8845 SM7325
Official page Samsung Exynos 1480 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1077 (70.1%)
460 (29.9%)
Total votes: 1537

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 778G and Exynos 1480, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
unknown April 1, 2024 at 06:28 PM
Samsung is actually doing well in this price range! The Exynos 1480 competes with the widely used Dimensity 7200 and even beats out the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2! Here's hoping the next generation "A" series (number 6) doesn't cause a price increase. If Samsung can maintain these prices and continue to upgrade, it will officially be on the right track!
+68 Reply
Avatar
Wicked August 6, 2024 at 09:20 AM
In same price range Chinese companies doing 8s gen 3 or 7+gen 3.
+20 Reply
Avatar
Ally August 9, 2024 at 02:42 AM
Wicked, Yeah sure but you're getting a better camera better software better screen and better build quality. Sometimes
+37 Reply
Avatar
Suggest a model under 18k May 27, 2026 at 12:25 AM
Wicked, Suggest a model under 18k
0 Reply
Avatar
Anon March 20, 2024 at 02:46 PM
Finally, Samsung is making some progress with its chipsets! They even created a custom GPU for this one! After a security patch or two, it should stabilize, and in about 2-3 months, games and apps should be optimized for it.
+56 Reply
Avatar
MasterMCGS March 15, 2024 at 11:01 AM
Snapdragon fanboys are voting on a Snapdragon that's three years old, lol. If you're looking for performance, get an X6 Pro.
+104 Reply
Avatar
Anonymous July 11, 2025 at 11:27 AM
The "fanboys" have no-lag phone for 3 years straight with no issues bozo.
+10 Reply
FZNxWarriorYT December 18, 2025 at 05:19 AM
Anonymous, Fr πŸ’― I used the Snapdragon 778G for a long time, and 20 days ago I switched to the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 πŸ₯Ή
+2 Reply
Avatar
L commenter March 7, 2026 at 12:13 PM
FZNxWarriorYT, Who really ask bro😭πŸ₯€πŸ₯€
+2 Reply
Avatar
iShowSpeed October 1, 2026 at 03:45 PM
FZNxWarriorYT, I upgraded to 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 Pro max.. recently πŸ₯°
0 Reply