Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Unisoc T9100 vs Unisoc T820 – what's better?

Unisoc T9100 vs Unisoc T820

Unisoc T9100
VS
Unisoc T820
Unisoc T9100
Unisoc T820

We compared two 8-core processors: Unisoc T9100 (with Mali-G57 MP4 graphics) and Unisoc T820 (Mali-G57 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Specs
  7. Comments (5)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Unisoc T820
  • Shows better (up to 5%) AnTuTu 11 score – 757K vs 723K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Unisoc T9100
vs
Unisoc T820

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Unisoc T9100
723825
Unisoc T820 +5%
757199
CPU 292879 262223
GPU 61687 57118
Memory 147055 290052
UX 222204 147806
Total score 723825 757199
Samples [11 tests] [3 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Unisoc T9100 +2%
2451
Unisoc T820
2392
Asset compression 134.1 MB/sec 117.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 51.9 pages/sec 56.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 85.6 Mpixels/sec 86.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 41.7 images/sec 41.5 images/sec
HDR 75.1 Mpixels/sec 68.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 8.19 images/sec 7.47 images/sec
Photo processing 20.3 images/sec 20.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.09 Mpixels/sec 3.5 Mpixels/sec
Samples Less than 3 3 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Unisoc T9100 +18%
2645
Unisoc T820
2236
Background blur 4.54 images/sec 3.32 images/sec
Face detection 1.97 images/sec 1.59 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 10.4 Gpixels/sec 6.45 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 398.1 FPS 390.3 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 2 tests 3 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Unisoc T9100 +14%
233
Unisoc T820
205
Score 233 205
Stability 97% 96%
Graphics test 2 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Unisoc T9100 +11%
14140
Unisoc T820
12740
Web score 14936 13579
Video editing score 7599 7072
Data manipulation score 9940 8739
Photo editing score 32237 25271
Writing score 15432 15437
Phones tested Less than 3 Less than 3

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Unisoc T9100
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (Vinnzzx67)AnTuTu 12821056
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> ChizuAnTuTu 11746898
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-22 (Firdausss)AnTuTu 11754254
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 -> Gil_lipata33AnTuTu 11723825
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (Zypher)AnTuTu 11723825
Add View all (14)
Unisoc T820
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-29 (Ануар)AnTuTu 11522607
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-21 (Hakuna matata)AnTuTu 11757199
πŸ“˜ 2025-02-09 (FilmEXETH)Geekbench 6 GPU2236
πŸ“˜ 2025-02-09 (FilmEXETH)Geekbench 6 CPU885 / 2392
πŸ“˜ 2024-11-20 (Chico Fico)Geekbench 6 GPU2228
Add View all (6)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Unisoc T9100 and Unisoc T820

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.7 GHz – Cortex-A76
3x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A55		 1x 2.7 GHz – Cortex-A76
3x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2700 MHz 2700 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G57 MP4 Mali-G57 MP4
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 780 MHz 780 MHz
Pipelines 4 4
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 128 128
FLOPS 199.7 Gigaflops 199.7 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 8 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17.07 Gb/s 17.07 Gb/s
Max size 32 GB 32 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3440 x 1440 3440 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Makalu IVY510
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 15
5G support Yes Yes
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.3 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced March 2025 November 2022
Class Mid range Mid range
Official page Unisoc T9100 official site Unisoc T820 official site
Further details
Notes on Unisoc T9100:
    - It's just rebranded Unisoc T820 chip.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
138 (66.3%)
70 (33.7%)
Total votes: 208

Related Comparisons

1. Unisoc T9100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
2. Unisoc T9100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7400
3. Unisoc T9100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300
4. Unisoc T9100 vs Samsung Exynos 1580
5. Unisoc T9100 vs Samsung Exynos 1480
6. Unisoc T9100 vs MediaTek Helio G100
7. Unisoc T9100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
8. Unisoc T9100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
9. Unisoc T820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (1)
10. Unisoc T820 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (8)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Unisoc T820 and Unisoc T9100, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Fei May 28, 2025 at 12:25 PM
Unisoc is such a unreliable company, all they do is rebrand their old chips
+20 Reply
Avatar
Ehe June 8, 2025 at 02:32 PM
Just like Mediatek & Qualcomm
+11 Reply
Avatar
Zan September 7, 2025 at 05:26 AM
I mean they all do rebranding same as Dimensity and Snapdragon
0 Reply
Avatar
ojan April 20, 2026 at 04:11 AM
just like MTK and SD.. they only do little improvement in other section such as Image Capture capability, Connectivity Modem, or AI Processing Module.
0 Reply
Avatar
Max April 28, 2025 at 10:00 AM
Just a same processor with better in terms of connectivity on T9100
+34 Reply
EnglishРусский