Tiger T612 vs Snapdragon 680

We compared two 8-core processors: Unisoc Tiger T612 (with Mali-G57 MP1 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (Adreno 610). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
  • Performs 7.3x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 12 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~71%)
  • 33% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 1800 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 24%) AnTuTu 11 score – 424K vs 342K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
342790
424216
CPU 140139 185604
GPU 16297 26544
Memory 88702 114814
UX 97652 97254
Total score 342790 424216
Samples [10 tests] [82 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
1511
Asset compression 75.2 MB/sec 85.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 43 pages/sec 43.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 46.4 Mpixels/sec 59.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 24.7 images/sec 15.7 images/sec
HDR 41.2 Mpixels/sec 49.8 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 3.69 images/sec 2.98 images/sec
Photo processing 10.6 images/sec 11.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 1.64 Mpixels/sec 2.59 Mpixels/sec
Samples 9 tests 35 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Tiger T612 +30%
451
Background blur 0.69 images/sec 0.32 images/sec
Face detection 0.33 images/sec 0.16 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 1.24 Gpixels/sec 1.48 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 73.5 FPS 26.6 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 4 tests 20 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 48 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 172
Stability - 97%
Graphics test - 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
7941
Web score 8324 7531
Video editing score 4329 4072
Data manipulation score 5813 6097
Photo editing score 15998 14785
Writing score 9489 8535
Phones tested 6 models 16 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 59 FPS
[Medium]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite - 23 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 65 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz - 62 FPS
[Medium]
Genshin Impact - 26 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 54 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Unisoc Tiger T612
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (zaicorld)AnTuTu360251
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 (Shammz)GeekBench CPU430 / 1390
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 (Shammz)AnTuTu364027
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 (Shammz)GeekBench CPU430 / 1390
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 (Shammz)AnTuTu364027
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (Eron)AnTuTu521704
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (That one guy)AnTuTu441460
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 -> a05stechAnTuTu448569
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (A05stech)AnTuTu448569
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-19 (Mohammed)GeekBench GPU348

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Tiger T612 and Snapdragon 680

CPU

Architecture 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 1800 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 12 nanometers 6 nanometers
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G57 MP1 Adreno 610
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Adreno 600
GPU frequency 650 MHz 1114 MHz
Pipelines 1 1
Shading units 32 128
Total shaders 32 128
FLOPS 39.3 Gigaflops 285.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) - Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1866 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 32 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth - 17 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2400 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 1080p at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - X11
4G support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 13
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 300 Mbps Up to 390 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2022 October 2021
Class Low end Low end
Model number - SM6225
Official page Unisoc Tiger T612 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
228 (19%)
970 (81%)
Total votes: 1198

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 680 and Tiger T612, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Kohei November 29, 2024 at 12:29 PM
Snapdragon 680 and T612 Both are outdated and weak now... Go for different processors guys
+51 Reply