Tiger T618 vs Snapdragon 662
We compared two 8-core processors: Unisoc Tiger T618 (with ARM Mali-G52 MP2 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (Adreno 610). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Unisoc Tiger T618
- Higher GPU frequency (~42%)
- Shows better (up to 22%) AnTuTu 9 score – 250K vs 204K
- Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
- Has a smaller size transistor (11 versus 12 nm)
We may receive a commission from Amazon for purchases made using the links below.
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 69359 | 69897 |
| GPU | 48246 | 33653 |
| Memory | 64278 | 45576 |
| UX | 69749 | 55919 |
| Total score | 250243 | 204861 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | 90.5 Mpixels/s | 88.3 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | 10.7 images/s | 13.3 images/s |
| Speech recognition | 23.3 words/s | 23.4 words/s |
| Machine learning | 19.2 images/s | 17.4 images/s |
| Camera shooting | 10.4 images/s | 11.2 images/s |
| HTML 5 | 1.52 Mnodes/s | 1.89 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | 452.6 Krows/s | 503.5 Krows/s |
3DMark
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | - | 99% |
| Graphics test | - | 2 FPS |
| Score | - | 372 |
Gaming
| PUBG Mobile | - | 28 FPS [Low] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | - | 30 FPS [Ultra] |
| Fortnite | - | 26 FPS [Low] |
| Shadowgun Legends | - | 54 FPS [Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | - | 59 FPS [Medium] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | - | 30 FPS [High] |
| Device | - | Xiaomi Poco M3 1080 x 2340 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Tiger T618 and Snapdragon 662CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73) 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Process | 12 nanometers | 11 nanometers |
| TDP | 10 W | 9 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | ARM Mali-G52 MP2 | Adreno 610 |
| Architecture | Bifrost | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 2 |
| Shading units | 32 | 96 |
| FLOPS | - | 272 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 11 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | - | 13.91 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | No | Hexagon 683 |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2160 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | - | X11 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 390 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | August 2019 | January 2020 |
| Class | Low end | Mid range |
| Model number | - | SM615 |
| Official page | - | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 official site |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1178
