Apple A19 Pro

GPU: Apple A19 Pro GPU
Cores: 6
Clock: 4260 MHz

Apple A19 Pro – an 6-core chipset that was announced on September 9, 2025, and is manufactured using a 3-nanometer process technology. It has 2 cores at 4260 MHz and 4 cores at 2600 MHz.

Review

CPU Performance

Gaming Performance

Battery life

NanoReview Score

Compare Apple A19 Pro with other SoCs

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios

Apple A19 Pro

2538751

CPU	753740
GPU	926158
Memory	217137
UX	641716
Total score	2538751

Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance

Single-Core Score

3970

Multi-Core Score

10558

Asset compression	338.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser	246.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer	235.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection	358.7 images/sec
HDR	337.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur	43.9 images/sec
Photo processing	109.5 images/sec
Ray tracing	10.8 Mpixels/sec
Samples	16 tests

Compute Score (GPU)

45708

Background blur	96.5 images/sec
Face detection	104.2 images/sec
Horizon detection	1.26 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection	1.6 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur	3.46 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching	0.61 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching	119 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics	4071.9 FPS
API	Metal
Samples	9 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)

3DMark Steel Nomad Light

2487

Score	2487
Stability	76%
Graphics test	18 FPS

3DMark Solar Bay

10999

Score	10999
Graphics test	42 FPS
Section 1	47 FPS
Section 2	42 FPS
Section 3	36 FPS

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users

Date	Benchmark	Result
📘 2026-09-16 (Anatoli)	AnTuTu	2304042
📘 2026-07-31 (xon1005)	GeekBench CPU	4028 / 10579
📘 2026-06-15 (Domi)	AnTuTu	2427596
📘 2026-06-09 (Cristiano)	AnTuTu	2258714
📘 2026-06-03 (Vin)	GeekBench CPU	3890 / 10107
📘 2026-05-29 (Joker)	AnTuTu	2433128
📘 2026-05-16 (Duy Dang)	GeekBench GPU	46574
📘 2026-05-16 (Duy Dang)	GeekBench CPU	4017 / 10705

Add View all (40)

Smartphones

Click on the device name to view detailed information

Phones with A19 Pro	AnTuTu v11
1. Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max	2590567
2. Apple iPhone Air	2568709
3. Apple iPhone 17 Pro	2538751

Specifications

Detailed specifications of the A19 Pro SoC with Apple A19 Pro GPU graphics

CPU

Architecture	2x 4.26 GHz – 4x 2.6 GHz –
Cores	6
Frequency	4260 MHz
Instruction set	ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache	192 KB
L2 cache	16 MB
Process	3 nanometers
Manufacturing	TSMC

Graphics

GPU name	Apple A19 Pro GPU
Architecture	Apple A GPU
GPU frequency	1620 MHz
Pipelines	6
Shading units	128
Total shaders	768
FLOPS	2488.3 Gigaflops

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU)	Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance	35 TOPS

Memory

Memory type	LPDDR5X
Memory frequency	4800 MHz
Bus	4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth	76.8 Gb/s
Max size	12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type	NVMe
Max camera resolution	3x 48MP
Video capture	4K at 120FPS
Video playback	4K at 120FPS
Video codecs	- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP8 - VP9 - Motion JPEG
Audio codecs	- AAC - AAX - AAX+ - AC-3 - AIFF - CAF - E-AC-3 - MP3 - MP4 - WAV

Connectivity

Modem	Snapdragon X80
4G support	LTE Cat. 24
5G support	Yes
Download speed	Up to 10000 Mbps
Upload speed	Up to 3700 Mbps
Wi-Fi	7
Bluetooth	6.0
Navigation	GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced	September 2025
Class	Flagship
Model number	APL1V12

Comparison with competitors

1. Apple A19 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (212)

2. Apple A19 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (50)

3. Apple A19 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) (33)

4. Apple A19 Pro vs Apple A18

5. Apple A19 Pro vs Apple A18 Pro (25)

6. Apple A19 Pro vs Apple A17 Pro (1)

Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!

a random stranger September 3, 2026 at 01:37 PM

Holy 45708 gpu is this peak

0 Reply

Sodiun July 16, 2026 at 04:21 PM

6 core in 2027 bruh🥀✌️

+3 Reply

someone August 13, 2026 at 11:48 AM

i mean if it runs efficiently, it doesn't matter how many cores does it have it's like using less ingredients to make better food

+9 Reply

Darkstar March 30, 2026 at 04:04 AM

Apple now uses their own custom Apple N1 chip for their chip which is how they have Wifi v7 and Bluetooth v6. Look at the online sources for the chip

+4 Reply

GG EZ January 24, 2026 at 12:18 PM

Samsung is best processor

+22 Reply

someone August 13, 2026 at 11:49 AM

yeah, best in your dreams also "samsung" isn't a processor it's a company that has a lot of departments

+2 Reply

Egg January 14, 2026 at 09:50 AM

Seems like they’ve updated the ranking now a19 pro is 3rd

+13 Reply

gaz December 18, 2025 at 02:00 PM

it's single core perf being slightly higher doesn't make it best, either apple paid them or site admins are just apple fanboys.

+4 Reply

Edward devtoun November 30, 2025 at 04:19 AM

Apple wins in terms of optimization and efficiency

+14 Reply

Teovipvt99 December 19, 2025 at 12:53 PM

No. Nanoreview ranking is right. If you sort by rating descending, you will get this list: 1. 8E gen 5 2. 8E gen 4 3. D9500 4. D9400+ 5. D9400 6. Apple A19 Pro Even losing D9400 sp does Apple buy this website? NOPE!

+6 Reply

PocoX7Users December 21, 2025 at 07:59 AM

Teovipvt99, A19 Pro better than 8 Elite Gen 4 and Dimensity 9400/9400+ In GPU, A19 Pro solos all.

+7 Reply

yoh December 23, 2025 at 11:34 PM

PocoX7Users, sorry, a19 pro

0 Reply

someone August 13, 2026 at 11:58 AM

Teovipvt99, nanoreview ranking is wrong, here's the right ranking 1. 8E gen 5 2. D9500 3. A19 Pro 4. 8E gen 4 5. D9400+/ D9400 maybe research more instead of relying on antutu's points or your fantasy land also even antutu itself said you can't compare scores between apple and android

+1 Reply

user November 13, 2025 at 12:23 PM

The snapdragon 8 elite gen 5 beats the apple chip in every single way except single core performance that in the apple chip is 0.5% higher, this ranking is bought by apple honestly.

+3 Reply

PocoX7Users November 13, 2025 at 10:30 PM

NanoReview giving wrong scores.

+12 Reply

admin December 4, 2025 at 08:16 AM

8 elite gen 5 Unreal Performance 🤣 AnTuTu 4m= 20W average power GeekBench 6 Multi-Core Score 12K = 22W average power Snapdragon X2 Elite cores are used in Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 🔥

0 Reply

Teovipvt99 December 19, 2025 at 12:54 PM

No, just sorted by rating desc, you will get A19 pro in top 6, even losing D9400, so does Apple buy this website? NOPE!

0 Reply

someone August 13, 2026 at 11:52 AM

Teovipvt99, idk what are you on but a19 is better than D9400 maybe do more research instead of relying on one website

0 Reply

someone August 13, 2026 at 11:53 AM

admin, no one cares about antutu and you can't compare iphone antutu scores to android antutu scores

0 Reply

babayaga November 8, 2025 at 08:02 PM

this is dumb, i got higher geekbench and antutu and it shows on eveey reviewers benchmarks. and for 8 gen 5 side of things, every reviewer reports lower scores compared to Nanoreview. is this a paid site?

0 Reply

PocoX7Users November 13, 2025 at 10:31 PM

Probably, they just giving higher points to Snapdragons

+2 Reply

Tony October 9, 2025 at 04:24 AM

Whats the TDP of this chipset?

+26 Reply

PocoX7Users September 25, 2025 at 08:09 PM

Geekbench still wrong, also Antutu. Fr NanoReview paid by Snapdragon and Dimensity every year.

+41 Reply

CPUPro September 25, 2025 at 07:49 AM

Garbage repackaged as an SoC.

+25 Reply

PocoX7Users September 28, 2025 at 03:53 PM

Like the Snapdragon’s and Dimensity’s which one is same every year.

+21 Reply

Poop Pickle November 7, 2025 at 06:19 PM

PocoX7Users, You talk alot for someone that mains a Poco Ewaste 🤣😒

+4 Reply

PocoX7Users November 13, 2025 at 10:32 PM

Poop Pickle, Yeah thats why I dont like Mediatek and Snapdragon at all. I used both flagship CPU's and they are just trash. When u use u can see Apple is better. 🤣

+9 Reply

Poop Pickle November 16, 2025 at 02:12 AM

PocoX7Users, You wish you could touch an iPhone 🤣 You're the Lord of Larping, your main phone (which is probably the best phone you've ever had) literally has a midrange (not flagship, keep that in mind) Dimensity 7300 SoC 😴 Your statement shows that all you do is melt in your room like a slobby pig all day and that you're probably a Versus.com warrior 😿

-2 Reply

PocoX7Users November 26, 2025 at 01:59 PM

Poop Pickle, Lol ur so funny 🤣 I've used Galaxy S10+, Galaxy S6, Galaxy S24, iPhone 14 Pro Max. And im sure, Apple is slightly better. Still, X7 isnt my main device, its my moms phone. 🤣 Im not sure about the thing ever u touched a iPhone, ur only speaking with ur A17 5G (which one is ur best phone ever u had) and glazing Android. Im not using even Versus.com that trash site, but u are 🤣 I've used many flagships, but Apple was better.

0 Reply

PocoX7Users November 26, 2025 at 02:00 PM

Poop Pickle, Why even you cried too much when i said anything to garbage SoC's? Only bark no bite.

+8 Reply

Today November 26, 2025 at 11:38 PM

Poop Pickle, What's your issue 😭

+8 Reply

Poop Pickle November 27, 2025 at 09:57 PM

PocoX7Users, Wow, your best phone is the S24 🤯. Every phone you mentioned is shitty e-waste that you can find for $400 or less on eBay 🤣🤣. Use a real flagship, then you can say stuff like this. It's obvious that you only know the extreme basics, just like every other iPhone skank. You are my son, and I own you 🥱.

-5 Reply

PocoX7Users November 30, 2025 at 04:22 PM

Poop Pickle , Dont cry son ur easy to win 😂 I’ve used S24 Snapdragon, not Exynos. U trash bum, u saying trash to S24? Wow absolutely professional knowledge 😂 Do u think it isnt flagship? How brainless r u gang? Just shut ur mouth up ur useless and waste of life.

+13 Reply

mcpftware71 December 10, 2025 at 05:08 AM

Poop Pickle, At first you say "You wish you could touch an iPhone" to him Then when he told you that he used a iPhone 14 Pro Max you call him a sleazy skank, which side are you on? 🤔 also, it's never this serious LOL

+8 Reply

mcpftware71 December 18, 2025 at 04:08 AM

mcpftware71, Lol bro. Hes silent like a dog now.

+8 Reply

jhfjf January 22, 2026 at 04:01 PM

Poop Pickle, $400 for an unlocked phone is alot for many people, Privileged final boss

+2 Reply

Adolf_Bonaparteé September 24, 2025 at 06:11 AM

Apple Is a beast company, fodder snapdragon have just one job to make chips , stills they gets bullied by apple every year

+30 Reply

LittleTheft November 5, 2025 at 05:48 AM

Omg, what a comment! 😂

+6 Reply

someone September 1, 2026 at 03:27 PM

LittleTheft, Omg, what a moron! 😂

0 Reply

Joe September 24, 2025 at 04:40 AM

Memory Max bandwidth 75.8 Gb/s -> 76.8 GB/s 4800MHz @ 64bit = 76.8 GB/s not 75.8GB/s.

+6 Reply

Joe October 29, 2025 at 09:09 PM

Update this please...

+1 Reply

Serhii October 30, 2025 at 07:27 AM

Joe, Wiki says it is 75.8. Please share any sources of your info :)

+1 Reply

Joe November 4, 2025 at 08:13 AM

Serhii, It was a typo on Wiki, plus Wiki is not a reliable source for these kind of specs, I literally spent months fixing specs there and there is still a lot more to do. I fixed it there.

0 Reply

Joe September 9, 2026 at 11:42 PM

Serhii, Max bandwidth 75.8 Gb/s -> 76.8 GB/s

0 Reply

Serhii September 10, 2026 at 07:19 AM

Joe, Sorry for that, specs updated.

0 Reply

Brian September 21, 2025 at 03:26 PM

I got 2.7 mill on au this ranking is wrong a19 pro a beast

+9 Reply

Alif September 22, 2025 at 05:54 AM

Brother i already said that the geekbench score also wrong but the admin is not correcting this.

+10 Reply

Alif September 19, 2025 at 11:07 AM

This geekbench score will 4010+ single core and Multi core will 11000+ https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13780176 This is the link of geekbench score

+7 Reply

Serhii September 20, 2025 at 08:44 AM

Thank you for your comment.

+3 Reply

Alif September 19, 2025 at 11:03 AM

Still the geekbench score wrong

+6 Reply

Marco Sebastiani September 18, 2025 at 06:45 PM

Hi admin i dont know if it's right what the site shows up the ram frequency but it is 9600mt/s 78,3 gb/s bandwidth

+1 Reply

Serhii September 19, 2025 at 07:04 AM

Appreciate your useful comment, Marco.

0 Reply

LittleTheft September 18, 2025 at 04:43 PM

Admin, correct the Geekbench score is 4000+ for single-core and 10,500+ for multi-core. Here is the links: Geekbench CPU: https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13808534 Geekbench GPU: https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/compute/4790837

+3 Reply

Alif September 17, 2025 at 05:43 PM

Brother A19 pro is number 1 but why is it in number 3? Please correct it

+15 Reply

fuuk1 September 17, 2025 at 08:39 AM

Apple should put this SoC in their cheaper MacBook Air, not A18 Pro.

+4 Reply

Manong October 23, 2025 at 07:43 AM

they just released the M5 in iPad which is bizarre lmao

0 Reply

Alif September 17, 2025 at 05:59 AM

Admin bro the correct geekbench score is single core 4020+ and multi core is 11500 please correct it.

+2 Reply

Serhii September 17, 2025 at 07:52 AM

Please share the link to Geekbench.

0 Reply

Kwonjun September 19, 2025 at 09:37 AM

Serhii, https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13780176

0 Reply

Mohd Izhar September 16, 2025 at 11:28 AM

Apple a19pro scores in single cores upto 4004 and multicore around 11000

+2 Reply

Serhii September 17, 2025 at 08:03 AM

It would be nice to see the results on the official Geekbench website.

+3 Reply

LittleTheft September 17, 2025 at 05:53 PM

Serhii, Already shared. Geekbench CPU: https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13808534 Geekbench GPU: https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/compute/4790837

+1 Reply

Marco September 17, 2025 at 07:00 PM

Serhii, Simple get the link to dame tech

0 Reply

Serhii September 18, 2025 at 07:00 AM

LittleTheft, Thank you for your comment.

0 Reply

PocoX7Users September 15, 2025 at 10:49 PM

Why Gaming points lowered? Also why this CPU have less points in battery life from A18 Pro. Its slightly better than All of chips in the world right now.

+3 Reply

Mo25 September 14, 2025 at 04:10 PM

A19 pro GPU frequency is 1620Mhz compared to 1490mhz in A18P A19p has 2488TFlops compared 2288TFlops in A18P but A19P has LPDDR5x higher frequency 4800mhz vs 3600mhz in A18P

+5 Reply

Serhii September 15, 2025 at 06:59 AM

Thank you for your comment.

+1 Reply

Alif September 14, 2025 at 01:40 PM

bro the single core score is 4004 and the multi core score is 10500+ so please correction this.

+3 Reply

Serhii September 15, 2025 at 06:59 AM

Can you share the link? :)

0 Reply

LittleTheft September 15, 2025 at 07:52 AM

Serhii, Geekbench CPU: https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13808534 Geekbench GPU: https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/compute/4790837

+5 Reply

Honk September 12, 2025 at 12:02 PM

Is 5g modem made by Qualcomm?

0 Reply

random guy September 14, 2025 at 10:39 AM

No, it’s apple’s own modem called “C1X”

+4 Reply

Brian September 21, 2025 at 08:20 PM

random guy, Only the air and iPhone 17 the pros are Qualcomm x80

0 Reply

Brian August 22, 2025 at 03:42 PM

I get over 2 mill with 16 pm and they 2.14 mill I get 2.25 mill with 16pm lol

+22 Reply

September 12, 2025 at 02:51 PM

You are online to much

+3 Reply

Dev August 20, 2025 at 05:44 PM

Still 6 core 2 performance and 4 efficiency . For smooth ui clicks in raw power other manufacturers wins

+7 Reply

Daya March 13, 2026 at 06:51 AM

Core count doesn't matter as much as there performance does you can have 18 weak cores in a processor but a quad core processor with much better ipc and a higher core clock would steam roll it a higher core count can improve performance but it comes at a cost of higher heat generation and power consumption which phones aren't exactly known for there ability to cool down fast and a thermally throttled soc means poor performance like the tensor g1 on paper it should have steamrolled the competition with its dual cortex x1 CPU cores backed with 2 cortex a76 cpu cores and 4 cortex a55 CPU cores and with a massive Mali g78 mp20 gpu but the sheer amount of heat it generated almost instantly made it the laughingstock of the technology world as it was quite a bit slower than the competitors socs and also made the devices they were in into a oven. core count means nothing when you don't consider the performance of the cores, the process node the soc was fabbed at, and the cooling and power consumption

0 Reply

Favi12 August 15, 2025 at 05:31 PM

Still no 8k recording

+7 Reply

iBrah banxz7 August 18, 2025 at 04:45 AM

Yes no 8k.

+2 Reply

asia45217 August 22, 2025 at 02:30 AM

8k is literally useless tho?

+16 Reply

Clutch August 26, 2025 at 03:14 PM

8K recording, in my opinion, won't be very useful for the next few generations. The manufacturers sporting it are mainly doing it for the spec sheet. You can get smoother video with a higher dynamic range at 4K. It might be really crisp, but it's only an awe factor, as it doesn't match the overall quality control 4K has gotten for the past decade.

+2 Reply

Vorta September 10, 2025 at 04:12 PM

asia45217, You should remember this thing whe you going blindly resis your favourite brand is that the 8k recording in how unnecessary or useless ,it the reason or one of the cause to justify the price of the high price smartphone!( Everything is matter ,the demand based on consumer demand ,if you're not demand anything then the brands looted you !🤡🤡

+2 Reply

Apple Fungus September 12, 2025 at 06:38 PM

Clutch, yaa.. whenever apple comes with 8k recording then person like you(apple fanboy) will say yes 8k is useful. chutiyaa

+33 Reply

I know September 21, 2025 at 08:53 AM

Clutch, Hey thats not true, on my S23 there is a noticible difference that gets much more noticible on a monitor. If you haven't used it, don't comment on it!

+3 Reply

Igy October 2, 2025 at 10:20 AM

I know, And no stabilization is ok for you at 8k? Then great 8k is useful if you compare It with phones from 2010s

0 Reply

Daya March 13, 2026 at 06:37 AM

Honestly 8k recording while cool is kinda useless as 99.9% of people don't own a 8k display to view it on 8k was supposed to be the next great thing years ago but it hasn't panned out yet as even 4k monitor adoption isn't yet dominate yes it's raising but it's not like the world has even fully accepted 4k outside of the tv market especially since how with normal monitor sizes the ppi at 1440p is already acceptable good and 4k is super high ppi meaning that 8k might never be needed for a computer monitor and most definitely never a phone the only place where 8k has made any appearance is in 100+ inch TVs that will leave your bank account crying for mercy and even then the majority of 100 inch TVs are still 4k because who is going to sit two feet away from a 100 inch tv

0 Reply