GPU: Adreno 509Cores: 8Clock: 1800 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 – an 8-core chipset that was announced on October 17, 2017, and is manufactured using a 14-nanometer process technology. It has 4 cores Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73) at 1800 MHz and 4 cores Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53) at 1600 MHz.
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
173124
CPU
63420
GPU
24498
Memory
31147
UX
54708
Total score
173124
GeekBench 5
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Image compression
76.9 Mpixels/s
Face detection
11.1 images/s
Speech recognition
20.4 words/s
Machine learning
15.5 images/s
Camera shooting
9.59 images/s
HTML 5
1.57 Mnodes/s
SQLite
425.9 Krows/s
3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
259
Graphics test
1 FPS
Score
259
Smartphones
Click on the device name to view detailed information
Specifications
Detailed specifications of the Snapdragon 636 SoC with Adreno 509 graphics
Architecture
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73) 4x 1.6 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)
Cores
8
Frequency
1800 MHz
Instruction set
ARMv8-A
Process
14 nanometers
Transistor count
2 billion
TDP
5 W
GPU name
Adreno 509
Architecture
Adreno 500
GPU frequency
720 MHz
Execution units
1
Shading units
128
FLOPS
184 Gigaflops
Vulkan version
1.0
OpenCL version
2.0
DirectX version
11
Memory type
LPDDR4
Memory frequency
1333 MHz
Bus
2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth
5.3 Gbit/s
Max size
8 GB
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon 680
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Max display resolution
1900 x 1200
Max camera resolution
1x 24MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Modem
X12
4G support
LTE Cat. 13
5G support
No
Download speed
Up to 600 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi
5
Bluetooth
5.0
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS
Comparison with competitors