Samsung Exynos 2400e – an 10-core chipset that was announced on September 26, 2024, and is manufactured using a 4-nanometer process technology. It has 1 core Cortex-X4 at 3110 MHz, 2 cores Cortex-A720 at 2900 MHz, 3 cores Cortex-A720 at 2600 MHz, and 4 cores Cortex-A520 at 1950 MHz.
Review
CPU Performance
72
Gaming Performance
56
Battery life
86
NanoReview Score
71
Compare Samsung Exynos 2400e with other SoCs
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks
AnTuTu 11
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
They fixed the battery error in Exynos processors. Energy efficiency has improved. Why is the Exynos 2400e energy efficiency 86? A low number. Raise it to 88 or 89. The number is weak and the processor’s energy efficiency has improved.
Edit battery Exynos 2400e High number battery 88 89
Also there is an error in the battery exynos 2400 and Exynos 2400e Battery 86? It is the same number as Exinus 2200 and Exynos 2400 more energy efficient processor. The number is supposed to rise more than 86 to 88 for example.
An error that needs to be corrected is Exynos 2400e written modem 5300 while Exynos 2400 written 5400 Please modify the error in Exynos 2400e to 5400 they are the same processors only the difference frequencies 1x 3.21 to 3.11
Modem Exynos 5300 -> Shannon 5153
Download speed Up to 9640 Mbps -> Up to 12100 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2550 Mbps -> Up to 3670 Mbps
Exynos modem 5xxx is external, almost all Exynos SoC use internal modem.
+3Reply
MauriceJuly 7, 2025 at 08:37 PM
It is a very good chip, sure, slower than SD 8 Gen 4 or Exynos 2500, but who cares when that chip is not slow at all and is in an affordable phone (S24 FE). One issue of the S24 FE is that upgrading from 128GB to 256GB eMMC is like +$100 :(
https://youtu.be/GX6nN7Y7fY0?si=N73DaZ1QzrYm1rDv
At 7:00, you can see that the 128GB s24FE scores 1,613,654 Points. More than the 8 Gen 2, and more than the 8S Gen 3. So, the 2400e is a powerhouse!
Very useful information, thank you for your comment.
+13Reply
My samsung tablet tab s9November 7, 2024 at 03:36 PM
The tablet it's power hungry I wish I had the an efficient soc compared to my tab s5e and its old now
+3Reply
...September 28, 2024 at 07:44 PM
Hi! I'd say that this is a good purchase. The AnTuTu score comes from the 128GB version, I watched the video. I hope that the 256GB version uses faster storage (UFS 4.0).
Even if it doesn't, it's still a great buy!
+23Reply
Someone out thereSeptember 28, 2024 at 07:59 AM
Samsung are being to invest more in their Exynos chipset. If they continue to push this way, I'm guessing in two to three years, they could catch up to Snapdragon👍
+18Reply
ViktikSeptember 28, 2024 at 06:27 AM
The frequency combination is really good. 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720 and 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520 will help in increasing battery life.
+9Reply
SUSSeptember 27, 2024 at 09:53 PM
At least better than SD 8 gen 2 ://///
+21Reply
KauçukSeptember 28, 2024 at 06:40 AM
Raw score wise this one is 33% weaker in GPU and is manufactured in Samsung's litography. How is this any better?
+31Reply
...October 1, 2024 at 02:09 PM
Kauçuk, Actually, it scores better. Don't mind the AnTuTu score. AnTuTu seems to have an issue with Exynos Chipsets; e.g the CPU here is more powerful than the 8 gen 2, but still has a low CPU score, for some reason.
+13Reply
HelioG420October 1, 2024 at 03:05 PM
Nowhere near as good lmao, but it is a significant upgrade over the 8 gen 1
+2Reply
SD870October 1, 2024 at 09:42 PM
Kauçuk, Xclipse 940 is better than Adreno 740, the low score of the Antutu test is weird
+11Reply
...October 4, 2024 at 10:28 AM
Kauçuk, Samsung has gotten pretty efficient these days. I think the 2400e will do good.
+11Reply
KauçukOctober 6, 2024 at 07:33 AM
..., Yea, their 1480 had a noteworthy developement on thermals from some comparements I have seen on Youtube between snapdragon.
+4Reply
User Unknown1April 4, 2025 at 04:12 AM
..., Not really. The chip is not that strong as what I expect.
