Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Exynos 2400e vs Exynos 2400 – what's better?

Exynos 2400e vs Exynos 2400

Exynos 2400e
VS
Exynos 2400
Exynos 2400e
Exynos 2400

We compared two 10-core processors: Samsung Exynos 2400e (with Samsung Xclipse 940 graphics) and Exynos 2400 (Samsung Xclipse 940). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Specs
  7. Comments (16)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Exynos 2400e
vs
Exynos 2400

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 2400e
1977269
Exynos 2400 +3%
2046435
CPU 675682 698933
GPU 670589 637772
Memory 229976 301201
UX 401022 408529
Total score 1977269 2046435
Samples [56 tests] [93 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 2400e
2045
Exynos 2400 +3%
2115
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 2400e
6397
Exynos 2400 +7%
6826
Asset compression 270.2 MB/sec 285.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 202.5 pages/sec 167.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 196.6 Mpixels/sec 165.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 150.7 images/sec 168.2 images/sec
HDR 200.6 Mpixels/sec 207.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 23.6 images/sec 25.3 images/sec
Photo processing 59.3 images/sec 63.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.7 Mpixels/sec 7.73 Mpixels/sec
Samples 24 tests 38 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 2400e +2%
16611
Exynos 2400
16273
Background blur 27.9 images/sec 28.2 images/sec
Face detection 16.6 images/sec 15 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.69 Gpixels/sec 0.6 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.74 Gpixels/sec 0.51 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.66 Gpixels/sec 0.84 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 50.5 Gpixels/sec 77.8 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2483.5 FPS 2872.5 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 21 tests 29 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1769 1769
Stability 70% 67%
Graphics test 13 FPS 13 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Exynos 2400e
7699
Exynos 2400 +8%
8302
Score 7699 8302
Graphics test 29 FPS 32 FPS
Section 1 35 FPS 37 FPS
Section 2 28 FPS 31 FPS
Section 3 24 FPS 25 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 3812
Stability - 57%
Graphics test - 22 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Exynos 2400e
16227
Exynos 2400 +6%
17172
Web score 15997 16695
Video editing score 8031 8032
Data manipulation score 12347 14884
Photo editing score 33878 35055
Writing score 19836 21619
Phones tested Less than 3 3 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2400e
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (Vishnu)AnTuTu 122276561
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle81%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShAnTuTu 122134029
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle0%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShGeekbench 6 CPU2014 / 6373
Add View all (105)
Samsung Exynos 2400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Viljami22AnTuTu 122321618
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 -> S25fe6833AnTuTu 122388378
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Neto)AnTuTu 112303141
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 -> JamesPatrickAnTuTu 112027080
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-08 (Ajr)AnTuTu 112027080
Add View all (153)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2400e and Exynos 2400

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.11 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520		 1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Cores 10 10
Frequency 3110 MHz 3210 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 940 Samsung Xclipse 940
Architecture RDNA 3 RDNA 3
GPU frequency 1095 MHz 1095 MHz
Pipelines 6 6
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 768 768
FLOPS 3406.8 Gigaflops 3406.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4200 MHz 4200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2400
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5400 Exynos 5400
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 9640 Mbps Up to 12100 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2550 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2024 January 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number - S5E9945
Official page - Samsung Exynos 2400 official site
Successor - - Samsung Exynos 2500

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1047 (42.3%)
1427 (57.7%)
Total votes: 2474

Related Comparisons

1. Samsung Exynos 2400e vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4)
2. Samsung Exynos 2400e vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4)
3. Samsung Exynos 2400e vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (2)
4. Samsung Exynos 2400e vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (9)
5. Samsung Exynos 2400e vs Apple A18 (4)
6. Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (29)
7. Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (99)
8. Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Google Tensor G3
9. Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
10. Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Samsung Exynos 2200 (2)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 2400 and Exynos 2400e, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Shubham November 3, 2025 at 07:05 PM
Actually it's performance is same in reality. Actually they work more on 2400e to make it more reliable and better and for marketing purposes as well so in minimum input it provides good output. S24FE performance is buttery smooth like a makkhan.
+9 Reply
Avatar
ouzienavantj September 6, 2025 at 01:41 AM
The difference is not felt for casual users. I used the S24 FE and it was enough for the performance, I didn't play games, so it was good. And, I'm not going to take an S25 FE that will use the Exynos 2400. Small difference, not worth it even though I changed the add. In the future, maybe I'll take the exynos 2600e on my next hape purchase.
+18 Reply
Avatar
Hijibij July 12, 2025 at 12:21 PM
Hey host. I think there was a wrong information you wrote in Exynos 2400's connectivity specs. Isn't there should be use WiFi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 in exynos 2400. Please correct the details.πŸ™
+25 Reply
Avatar
Someone out there January 25, 2025 at 01:40 PM
The Exynos 2400e have slightly better CPU and GPU scores on the updated antutu benchmark than the Exynos 2400... Impressive 😁
+89 Reply
Avatar
Truth January 13, 2025 at 04:04 AM
So the difference is only 100 mhz πŸ€”
+50 Reply
Avatar
Ara'Kara, City of Echoes November 22, 2024 at 04:39 PM
Between s24 fe and s24+ the call battery time looks like an immensely improvement. The comparison makes sense because they have similar batteries (s24 fe 4700 actually while s24+ has 4900) and effective equal SoCs regarding computing performance and parts (honestly 2400e is just battery saver mode on 2400, which is how nearly everyone uses the s24 anyway). So this makes me wonder if the modem actually was improved finally? With Samsung's atrocious modem backtrack in the S series, this should be separetely measured in case of exynoses apparently even if they call it the same. S24 with 2400e should have been what s24 was in Europe at least, if they did want to cut the costs so badly.
+11 Reply
Avatar
Mrsch October 8, 2024 at 12:39 PM
Really decent chip. Samsung seems to be on the right road to redemption.
+26 Reply
Avatar
user October 4, 2024 at 06:27 PM
So more updated results came in for AnTuTu 10. Now it *really* looks more similar to the regular 2400. Honestly this makes the $649 price tag a bit more enticing compared to the regular S24's $800.
+20 Reply
Avatar
Say September 30, 2024 at 08:45 AM
Not bad tbh, but exynos 2400 should've been the soc of the s24 fe, besides, it's not a bad cpu at all
+20 Reply
Avatar
User September 28, 2024 at 03:48 PM
The score for the 2400e is wrong. It scores about 1.6M!
+48 Reply
Avatar
user September 28, 2024 at 05:19 AM
Essentially, its the same chip but underclocked by 100 MHz. Performance is still good on its own but Idrk why Samsung thought about doing this if they're essentially using the same architecture.
+31 Reply
Avatar
lilaz September 28, 2024 at 12:58 PM
They should continue with their Exynos line. Eventually their chips would be on par with Qualcomms chips. But that would take some time
+32 Reply
Avatar
... October 1, 2024 at 04:11 AM
The Exynos 2400e is the fine tuned version of the 2400, for less power draw and maximum performance.
+40 Reply
Avatar
Are you serious? October 3, 2024 at 03:23 PM
lilaz, Lol! No. This will never happen. Samsung will never invest in their chips like Qualcomm.
+5 Reply
Avatar
Not until samsung refines manufacturing November 8, 2024 at 10:57 AM
Are you serious?, Actually, the issue is not the chip architecture but the fab node. Samsung's 4nm node is bad. They are using off the shelf ARM CPU/GPU cores, same as countless other chips. it's just their manufacturing node that makes them overheat & throttle. Same reason for 8Gen 1. Literally no current gen chips, mobile or desktop or enterprise are being made by Samsung. TSMC is the biggest monopoly rn.
+30 Reply
Avatar
rei August 29, 2025 at 06:25 AM
lilaz, I agree. I have this feeling the Exynos will do a massive comeback cause of it's innovative approach. But things cans still vary. It's either blowing up or giving up. They got really close with Qualcomm since the Exynos 2200, despite just starting to use their own Xclipse GPU. I gotta say, as an experimental approach, that was really remarkable πŸ”₯
+3 Reply
EnglishРусский