Exynos 2400e vs Snapdragon 8s Gen 3

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2400e (Samsung Xclipse 940) with the older 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (Adreno 735) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400e
  • Performs 2x better in floating-point computations
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Shows better (up to 10%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1977K vs 1797K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1977269
CPU 675682 556525
GPU 670589 503679
Memory 229976 307418
UX 401022 430199
Total score 1977269 1797821
Samples [56 tests] [287 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 270.2 MB/sec 219.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 202.5 pages/sec 156.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 196.6 Mpixels/sec 167.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 150.7 images/sec 113.3 images/sec
HDR 200.6 Mpixels/sec 142.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 23.6 images/sec 16.9 images/sec
Photo processing 59.3 images/sec 51.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.7 Mpixels/sec 6.15 Mpixels/sec
Samples 24 tests 64 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 27.9 images/sec 13.6 images/sec
Face detection 16.6 images/sec 6.39 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.69 Gpixels/sec 0.47 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.74 Gpixels/sec 0.55 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.66 Gpixels/sec 0.54 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 50.5 Gpixels/sec 26.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2483.5 FPS 1701.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 21 tests 40 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1769 1033
Stability 70% 90%
Graphics test 13 FPS 8 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 7699 4992
Graphics test 29 FPS 19 FPS
Section 1 35 FPS 22 FPS
Section 2 28 FPS 19 FPS
Section 3 24 FPS 16 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 3116
Stability - 82%
Graphics test - 18 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 15997 14506
Video editing score 8031 7662
Data manipulation score 12347 15136
Photo editing score 33878 27100
Writing score 19836 19378
Phones tested Less than 3 14 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2400e
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (Vishnu)AnTuTu 122276561
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle81%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShAnTuTu 122134029
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle0%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShGeekbench 6 CPU2014 / 6373
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> Rox9ne9CPU Throttle92%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> Rox9ne9Geekbench 6 CPU1952 / 5317
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> Rox9ne9AnTuTu 111950942
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 (Rox9ne9)Geekbench 6 CPU1960 / 5182
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-17 (Jikorei Miruko)AnTuTu 121988803

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2400e and Snapdragon 8s Gen 3

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.11 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2 GHz – Cortex-A520
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3110 MHz 3000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache - 128 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 7.5 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 940 Adreno 735
Architecture RDNA 3 Adreno 700
GPU frequency 1095 MHz 1100 MHz
Pipelines 6 3
Shading units 128 256
Total shaders 768 768
FLOPS 3406.8 Gigaflops 1689.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4200 MHz 4200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 67.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5400 Snapdragon X70 5G
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 22
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 9640 Mbps Up to 6500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2550 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 7
Bluetooth 5.3 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2024 March 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number - SM8635
Official page - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
511 (78.6%)
139 (21.4%)
Total votes: 650

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 and Exynos 2400e, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Infinix Gt 20 Pro May 6, 2025 at 12:52 AM
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 512 GB Exynos 2400e Price 365$ or Poco F6 512 GB Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Price 310$?
+54 Reply
Avatar
... September 29, 2024 at 04:07 PM
Kindly ignore the AnTuTu score. On Geekbench, the 2400e is purely superior. AnTuTu doesn't seem to get the Exynos Chipsets too well.
+80 Reply