Exynos 2400e vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2400e (Samsung Xclipse 940) with the older 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (Adreno 740) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400e
  • Higher GPU frequency (~61%)
  • Performs 63% better in floating-point computations
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Shows better (up to 13%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1977K vs 1757K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1977269
CPU 675682 553922
GPU 670589 434880
Memory 229976 311861
UX 401022 456381
Total score 1977269 1757044
Samples [56 tests] [238 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 270.2 MB/sec 218.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 202.5 pages/sec 145.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 196.6 Mpixels/sec 168.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 150.7 images/sec 133 images/sec
HDR 200.6 Mpixels/sec 167.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 23.6 images/sec 18.8 images/sec
Photo processing 59.3 images/sec 34.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.7 Mpixels/sec 5.78 Mpixels/sec
Samples 24 tests 132 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 27.9 images/sec 12.3 images/sec
Face detection 16.6 images/sec 5.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.69 Gpixels/sec 0.53 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.74 Gpixels/sec 0.56 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.66 Gpixels/sec 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 50.5 Gpixels/sec 32.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2483.5 FPS 2177.4 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 21 tests 66 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1769 1092
Stability 70% 67%
Graphics test 13 FPS 8 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 7699 5312
Stability - 67%
Graphics test 29 FPS 20 FPS
Section 1 35 FPS 23 FPS
Section 2 28 FPS 20 FPS
Section 3 24 FPS 17 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 3667
Stability - 45%
Graphics test - 21 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 15997 13957
Video editing score 8031 7265
Data manipulation score 12347 14272
Photo editing score 33878 32179
Writing score 19836 17828
Phones tested Less than 3 9 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 90 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 56 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends - 118 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 120 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro
1116 x 2480
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2400e
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (Vishnu)AnTuTu 122276561
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle81%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShAnTuTu 122134029
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle0%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShGeekbench 6 CPU2014 / 6373
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 -> Saad_irqAnTuTu 121959121
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 -> sento raitoAnTuTu 122035354
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (bySK1LL)AnTuTu 121974839
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Babababi)AnTuTu 121953931
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 -> RennsportCPU Throttle80%

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2400e and Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.11 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X3
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A710
3x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3110 MHz 3200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9-A
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count - 16 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 8.5 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 940 Adreno 740
Architecture RDNA 3 Adreno 700
GPU frequency 1095 MHz 680 MHz
Pipelines 6 3
Shading units 128 512
Total shaders 768 1536
FLOPS 3406.8 Gigaflops 2089 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4200 MHz 4200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 67.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5400 Snapdragon X70
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 9640 Mbps Up to 10000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2550 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 7
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2024 November 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number - SM8550-AB
Official page - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Further details
Notes on Snapdragon 8 Gen 2:
    - There's also the "Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy," which only differs by having a 160 MHz higher CPU clock and a 39 MHz higher GPU clock, resulting in 2208.8 GFLOPS for the GPU. Generally, you won't notice this difference in real-life usage, including games.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1026 (73.2%)
376 (26.8%)
Total votes: 1402

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and Exynos 2400e, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Truth January 13, 2025 at 04:07 AM
If 2400 or 2400e was released at the time of SD 8 gen 2. It could change all our minds.
+70 Reply
Avatar
K.ZoZ November 8, 2024 at 11:05 AM
Hello Serhii I really want to know why on your site Samsung processors have low points, especially in the battery life point, (I know that Samsung processors or processors built on Samsung architecture had problems with power consumption and temperature control before), but in the midst of this crisis, if you go back to your site data, you will see that even the Exynos 2200 got lower points than the Snapdragon 8 gen 1, even though they were both designed on the same architecture and the same company manufactured them both, which is Samsung. I want to know why the Exynos 2200 processor got the same points as the Exynos 2400 or 2400e, even though the Exynos 2400e processor is very energy efficient and its temperature control is great, and I use my Galaxy S24 FE phone and I tell you that this processor is stronger in all points and all data than the SD 8 GEN 2 processor, and believe me this data is from personal experience, so why do you make people get the idea that this processor is bad at power consumption? Finally, I hope that you investigate a little about this topic and see the processor data from some sites or know the experience of using the processor from some users. Thank you for your understanding, Serhii.
+48 Reply
Avatar
Kazem November 8, 2024 at 04:46 PM
Hey serhii, how are you bro i see this message and you surly read it but you didn't do anything about the score of the exynos 2400e, Honestly I really agree with this guy and you can actually raise this therapist's score to 89 or 90 or even work on reviewing the score and giving a fair rating to this therapist.
+18 Reply
Avatar
Malkoom November 9, 2024 at 05:58 PM
Nice point of view but it is unlikely that the administrators of this site read your words
+29 Reply