OnePlus Pad 3 vs OnePlus Pad
Here we compared two tablets: the 13.2-inch OnePlus Pad 3 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on June 5, 2025, against the OnePlus Pad, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9000 and came out 2 years and 4 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Pad 3
- 2.8x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3317K versus 1190K)
- Has a 1.59 inches larger screen size
- Delivers 91% higher peak brightness (850 against 446 nits)
- Comes with 2630 mAh larger battery capacity: 12140 vs 9510 mAh
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 67W)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
- 78% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3003 and 1691 points
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Pad
- Shows 25% longer battery life (22:00 vs 17:40 hours)
- Much smaller footprint: 19% more compact case (75.8 vs 94.1 square inches)
- Weighs 123 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 13.2 inches | 11.61 inches |
| Resolution | 2400 x 3392 pixels | 2000 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 7:5 | 7:5 |
| PPI | 315 ppi | 296 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max rated brightness | 900 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Screen protection | 60-144 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.6% | 84.2% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | - | 99.8% |
| PWM | - | 60 Hz |
| Response time | - | 20 ms |
| Contrast | - | 1481:1 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 3
13.2″ (7:5 ratio) = 82.4 in2
OnePlus Pad
11.61″ (7:5 ratio) = 63.8 in2
~29% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 289.61 mm (11.4 inches) | 258.03 mm (10.16 inches) |
| Width | 209.66 mm (8.25 inches) | 189.41 mm (7.46 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.97 mm (0.24 inches) | 6.54 mm (0.26 inches) |
| Weight | 675 g (23.81 oz) | 552 g (19.47 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Blue | Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 607 cm2 (94.1 inches2) | 489 cm2 (75.8 inches2) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (34th and 88th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (25th and 65th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 |
| Max clock | 4320 MHz | 3050 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 1 core at 3.05 GHz: Cortex-X2 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | MediaTek APU 590 |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 640 |
| GPU clock | 1100 MHz | 848 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS | ~1085.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 24691 | 6296 |
| Single-core score | 3003 | 1691 |
| Multi-core score | 9307 | 4386 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1061523 | 410160 |
| GPU | 1152696 | 253720 |
| Memory | 369778 | 203220 |
| UX | 733417 | 323067 |
| Total score | 3317414 | 1190167 |
| Samples | [4 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 82% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 19 FPS | 6 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2544 | 787 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 45 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 50 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 46 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 40 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 11865 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 13279 | - |
| Video editing | 6340 | - |
| Photo editing | 25239 | - |
| Data manipulation | 15200 | - |
| Writing score | 18634 | - |
Recent User Tests
OnePlus Pad 3
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-09 (Harsh) | AnTuTu 11 | 3242325 |
| 📘 2026-07-10 (Даниил Oneplus Fan) | AnTuTu 11 | 3286274 |
| 📘 2026-06-20 (SusGo0d) | AnTuTu 11 | 3188009 |
| 📘 2026-04-03 -> Afera666 | AnTuTu 11 | 3612786 |
| 📘 2026-03-30 (Shakeel) | AnTuTu 11 | 3317414 |
OnePlus Pad
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2025-10-25 (Akash) | AnTuTu 11 | 1190167 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) |
| ROM | Oxygen OS 15 | OxygenOS 15 |
| OS size | - | 23 GB |
Battery
| Capacity | 12140 mAh | 9510 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 67 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (40% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:29 hr | 1:18 hr |
| Web browsing | 06:01 hr | 08:15 hr |
| Watching video | 12:27 hr | 12:45 hr |
| Gaming | 07:31 hr | 05:59 hr |
| Standby | 77 hr | 112 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4128 x 3096 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | - | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 23 mm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.3 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | - | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | - |
| Hybrid slot | No | - |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | June 2025 | February 2023 |
| Release date | June 2025 | April 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $479 |
| Successor | - | - OnePlus Pad 3 |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
- Hall-effect sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Keyboard weight | - | 360 g |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 67 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the OnePlus Pad 3 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 9