Vivo Pad 6 Pro vs Lenovo Idea Tab Plus
89
out of 100
VS
60
out of 100
Here we compared two tablets: the 13.2-inch Vivo Pad 6 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on March 30, 2026, against the Lenovo Idea Tab Plus, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 6400 and came out 7 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo Pad 6 Pro
- 8x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4152K versus 519K)
- Has a 1.1 inches larger screen size
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Comes with 2800 mAh larger battery capacity: 13000 vs 10200 mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Supports higher wattage charging (66W versus 45W)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- 40% higher pixel density (348 vs 249 PPI)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
Reasons to consider the Lenovo Idea Tab Plus
- Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 2048GB
- Much smaller footprint: 15% more compact case (78.3 vs 91.9 square inches)
- Weighs 133 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 13.2 inches | 12.1 inches |
| Resolution | 2512 x 3840 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 348 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Max rated brightness | - | 800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1200 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.5% | 84.1% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | - | 134.4% |
| PWM | - | Not detected |
| Response time | - | 23 ms |
| Contrast | - | 1296:1 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 6 Pro
13.2″ (3:2 ratio) = 80.4 in2
Idea Tab Plus
12.1″ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
~22% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 297 mm (11.69 inches) | 278.8 mm (10.98 inches) |
| Width | 199.8 mm (7.87 inches) | 181.05 mm (7.13 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.2 mm (0.24 inches) | 6.29 mm (0.25 inches) |
| Weight | 663 g (23.39 oz) | 530 g (18.69 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | IP52 |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Purple | Gray, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 593 cm2 (92 inches2) | 505 cm2 (78.3 inches2) |
| Repairability | - | Excellent (4.05/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Bad (E) · 5 drops |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (7th and 92nd place)
Android Tablet Ranking (5th and 68th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 |
| Max clock | 4600 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU cores | - | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
| L3 cache | - | 2 MB |
| Manufacturing | - | TSMC |
| Lithography process | - | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | - | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | - | 64 |
| GPU clock | - | 1072 MHz |
| FLOPS | - | ~137.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 1240 |
| Single-core score | 3747 | 764 |
| Multi-core score | 11695 | 2021 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1110159 | 215919 |
| GPU | 1516479 | 47513 |
| Memory | 602280 | 109180 |
| UX | 923467 | 147129 |
| Total score | 4152385 | 519771 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [2 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Graphics test | - | 1 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 138 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 15292 |
| Video editing | - | 6125 |
| Photo editing | - | 25011 |
| Data manipulation | - | 7802 |
| Writing score | - | 14566 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | - | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | No | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | - | Up to 2048 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| ROM | OriginOS 6 | - |
| OS size | - | 28 GB |
| OS updates | - | 0 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 13000 mAh | 10200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 66 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 40 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 1:27 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1000 cycles |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4160 x 3120 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.0 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Aperture | - | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | - | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | - | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | No | Nano |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | March 2026 | September 2025 |
| Release date | April 2026 | October 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $839 | $229 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
- Hall-effect sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 66 W | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo Pad 6 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1