Vivo Pad 6 Pro vs Galaxy Tab S11

89 out of 100
Vivo Pad 6 Pro
VS
86 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11

Here we compared two flagship tablets: the 13.2-inch Vivo Pad 6 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on March 30, 2026, against the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus and came out 7 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Vivo Pad 6 Pro
  • Has a 2.2 inches larger screen size
  • Comes with 4600 mAh larger battery capacity: 13000 vs 8400 mAh
  • 51% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4152K versus 2745K)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Supports higher wattage charging (66W versus 45W)
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • 27% higher pixel density (348 vs 274 PPI)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 3.1
  • Reverse charging feature
  • 37% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3747 and 2742 points
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 2048GB
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • Much smaller footprint: 29% more compact case (65.1 vs 91.9 square inches)
  • Dynamic AMOLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
  • Weighs 194 grams less
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Vivo Pad 6 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 128 GB
44.2
(Average)
Value Index
41.8
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD Dynamic AMOLED
Size 13.2 inches 11 inches
Resolution 2512 x 3840 pixels 1600 x 2560 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 16:10
PPI 348 ppi 274 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate - Yes
Max rated brightness - 1000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1200 nits 1600 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 Yes, HDR10+
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 87.5% 83.6%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space - 99.5%
PWM - 480 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
Pad 6 Pro
13.2″ (3:2 ratio) = 80.4 in2
Galaxy Tab S11
11″ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
~47% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
n/a
935 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 297 mm (11.69 inches) 253.8 mm (9.99 inches)
Width 199.8 mm (7.87 inches) 165.3 mm (6.51 inches)
Thickness 6.2 mm (0.24 inches) 5.5 mm (0.22 inches)
Weight 663 g (23.39 oz) 469 g (16.54 oz)
Waterproof No IP68
Advanced cooling - Vapor chamber
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Gray, Blue, Purple Silver, Gray
Fingerprint scanner No Yes, in-display
Area 593 cm2 (92 inches2) 420 cm2 (65 inches2)
Repairability - Average (2.86/5)
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Pad 6 Pro +5%
87.5%
Tablet Ranking (9th and 21st place)
Android Tablet Ranking (7th and 16th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo Pad 6 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
Max clock 4600 MHz 3630 MHz
CPU cores - 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925
L3 cache - 12 MB
Manufacturing - TSMC
Lithography process - 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) - MediaTek NPU 890
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
GPU shading units - 1536
GPU clock - 1612 MHz
FLOPS - ~4952.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo Pad 6 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Pad 6 Pro +37%
3747
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Pad 6 Pro +31%
11695
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) - 21988
Single-core score 3747 2742
Multi-core score 11695 8933
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Pad 6 Pro +51%
4152385
2745560
CPU 1110159 871712
GPU 1516479 976476
Memory 602280 335022
UX 923467 562350
Total score 4152385 2745560
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 73%
Graphics test - 18 FPS
Graphics score - 2385
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 41 FPS
Section 1 - 47 FPS
Section 2 - 42 FPS
Section 3 - 35 FPS
Graphics score - 10813
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 14704
Video editing - 7384
Photo editing - 41221
Data manipulation - 13970
Writing score - 27706

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo Pad 6 Pro
No benchmark results yet
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-27 (JJ)AnTuTu 121116490
📘 2026-06-11 (Omsin)AnTuTu 112745560

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 8 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock - 5333 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No MicroSD
Memory card max size - Up to 2048 GB

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM OriginOS 6 One UI 8.5
OS updates - 0 years

Battery

Capacity 13000 mAh 8400 mAh
Max charge power 66 W 45 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes Yes (50% in 40 min)
Full charging time - 1:30 hr
Battery cycles - 1200 cycles

Main camera

Matrix 13 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution 4160 x 3120 4128 x 3096
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Lenses 1) Standard: 13 MP
1) Standard: 13 MP
Camera features - -
Standard lens
Image resolution 13 MP 13 MP
Aperture - f/2.0
Focal length - 26 mm
Sensor size - 1/3.4" (≈ 0.29 inch)
Pixel size - 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Aperture - f/2.4
Sensor - CMOS
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS - GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* - 1
Type of SIM card No Nano
Multi SIM mode - Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support No Yes

Sound

Speakers 8.0 4.0
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos - Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced March 2026 September 2025
Release date April 2026 September 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $839 $799
SAR (body) - 0.99 W/kg
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 66 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance, gaming, and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Vivo Pad 6 Pro. But if the camera, software, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
2 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 2

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!