Vivo Pad 6 Pro vs Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Here we compared two flagship tablets: the 13.2-inch Vivo Pad 6 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on March 30, 2026, against the Vivo Pad 5 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 and came out 1 year before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo Pad 6 Pro
- 47% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4152K versus 2825K)
- Comes with 950 mAh larger battery capacity: 13000 vs 12050 mAh
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- 22% higher pixel density (348 vs 286 PPI)
- Reverse charging feature
- 37% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3747 and 2738 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 13.2 inches | 13 inches |
| Resolution | 2512 x 3840 pixels | 2064 x 3096 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| PPI | 348 ppi | 286 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | - | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | - | 1200 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1200 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, HDR10 |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.5% | 87.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | - | 99.5% |
| PWM | - | Not detected |
| Response time | - | 48 ms |
| Contrast | - | 1366:1 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 6 Pro
13.2″ (3:2 ratio) = 80.4 in2
Pad 5 Pro
13″ (3:2 ratio) = 78 in2
~3% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 297 mm (11.69 inches) | 289.56 mm (11.4 inches) |
| Width | 199.8 mm (7.87 inches) | 198.32 mm (7.81 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.2 mm (0.24 inches) | 6.64 mm (0.26 inches) |
| Weight | 663 g (23.39 oz) | 635 g (22.4 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Purple | White, Gray, Blue, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 593 cm2 (92 inches2) | 574 cm2 (89 inches2) |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (9th and 33rd place)
Android Tablet Ranking (7th and 25th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| Max clock | 4600 MHz | 3630 MHz |
| CPU cores | - | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - | - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
| L3 cache | - | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | - | TSMC |
| Lithography process | - | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | - | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU shading units | - | 1536 |
| GPU clock | - | 1612 MHz |
| FLOPS | - | ~4952.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 24474 |
| Single-core score | 3747 | 2738 |
| Multi-core score | 11695 | 8542 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1110159 | 889187 |
| GPU | 1516479 | 966129 |
| Memory | 602280 | 370036 |
| UX | 923467 | 600124 |
| Total score | 4152385 | 2825476 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [51 tests] |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| ROM | OriginOS 6 | OriginOS 5 |
| OS size | - | 17 GB |
Battery
| Capacity | 13000 mAh | 12050 mAh |
| Max charge power | 66 W | 66 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - | - Bokeh mode |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.2 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Sensor | - | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | - |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | March 2026 | April 2025 |
| Release date | April 2026 | April 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $839 | $539 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 66 W | Yes, 66 W |
Further details
Notes on Pad 5 Pro:
- The 128GB model has UFS 3.1, while 256GB and 512GB use UFS 4.1.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo Pad 6 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 12