Vivo Pad 6 Pro vs OnePlus Pad 3
Here we compared two flagship tablets: the 13.2-inch Vivo Pad 6 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on March 30, 2026, against the OnePlus Pad 3, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 10 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo Pad 6 Pro
- Comes with 860 mAh larger battery capacity: 13000 vs 12140 mAh
- 25% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4152K versus 3317K)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
- 10% higher pixel density (348 vs 315 PPI)
- Reverse charging feature
- 25% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3747 and 3003 points
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Pad 3
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 66W)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 13.2 inches | 13.2 inches |
| Resolution | 2512 x 3840 pixels | 2400 x 3392 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 7:5 |
| PPI | 348 ppi | 315 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | - | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | - | 900 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1200 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | 60-144 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.5% | 87.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 3
13.2″ (7:5 ratio) = 82.4 in2
Pad 6 Pro
13.2″ (3:2 ratio) = 80.4 in2
~2% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 297 mm (11.69 inches) | 289.61 mm (11.4 inches) |
| Width | 199.8 mm (7.87 inches) | 209.66 mm (8.25 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.2 mm (0.24 inches) | 5.97 mm (0.24 inches) |
| Weight | 663 g (23.39 oz) | 675 g (23.81 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Purple | Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 593 cm2 (92 inches2) | 607 cm2 (94.1 inches2) |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (7th and 34th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (5th and 25th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Max clock | 4600 MHz | 4320 MHz |
| CPU cores | - | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - | - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
| L3 cache | - | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | - | TSMC |
| Lithography process | - | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | - | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU shading units | - | 1536 |
| GPU clock | - | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | - | ~3379.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 24691 |
| Single-core score | 3747 | 3003 |
| Multi-core score | 11695 | 9307 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1110159 | 1061523 |
| GPU | 1516479 | 1152696 |
| Memory | 602280 | 369778 |
| UX | 923467 | 733417 |
| Total score | 4152385 | 3317414 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [4 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 82% |
| Graphics test | - | 19 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 2544 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 45 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 50 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 46 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 40 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 11865 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 13279 |
| Video editing | - | 6340 |
| Photo editing | - | 25239 |
| Data manipulation | - | 15200 |
| Writing score | - | 18634 |
Recent User Tests
Vivo Pad 6 Pro
No benchmark results yet
OnePlus Pad 3
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-09 (Harsh) | AnTuTu 11 | 3242325 |
| 📘 2026-07-10 (Даниил Oneplus Fan) | AnTuTu 11 | 3286274 |
| 📘 2026-06-20 (SusGo0d) | AnTuTu 11 | 3188009 |
| 📘 2026-04-03 -> Afera666 | AnTuTu 11 | 3612786 |
| 📘 2026-03-30 (Shakeel) | AnTuTu 11 | 3317414 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| ROM | OriginOS 6 | Oxygen OS 15 |
Battery
| Capacity | 13000 mAh | 12140 mAh |
| Max charge power | 66 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (40% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 1:29 hr |
| Web browsing | - | 06:01 hr |
| Watching video | - | 12:27 hr |
| Gaming | - | 07:31 hr |
| Standby | - | 77 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4128 x 3096 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.2 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | - | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | - | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | March 2026 | June 2025 |
| Release date | April 2026 | June 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $839 | $649 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 66 W | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo Pad 6 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 7