Xiaomi Poco Pad C1 vs Xiaomi Pad 7
Here we compared two tablets: the 9.7-inch Xiaomi Poco Pad C1 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2) that was released on May 21, 2026, against the Xiaomi Pad 7, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 and came out 1 year and 7 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 2048GB
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Much smaller footprint: 23% more compact case (51.9 vs 67.6 square inches)
- Weighs 94 grams less
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7
- 3.3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1697K versus 511K)
- Has a 1.5 inches larger screen size
- Has 2x more RAM: 8GB versus 4GB
- Comes with 1250 mAh larger battery capacity: 8850 vs 7600 mAh
- Higher display refresh rate β 144 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 18W)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- 28% higher pixel density (344 vs 268 PPI)
- Has a built-in infrared port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 9.7 inches | 11.2 inches |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2048 pixels | 2136 x 3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| PPI | 268 ppi | 344 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | - |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 360 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.9% | 85.7% |
| Display features | - | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | - | 97.3% |
| PWM | - | Not detected |
| Response time | - | 23 ms |
| Contrast | - | 952:1 |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 226.51 mm (8.92 inches) | 251.22 mm (9.89 inches) |
| Width | 147.97 mm (5.83 inches) | 173.42 mm (6.83 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm (0.29 inches) | 6.18 mm (0.24 inches) |
| Weight | 406 g (14.32 oz) | 500 g (17.64 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Black, Blue, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 335 cm2 (52 inches2) | 436 cm2 (67.5 inches2) |
| Repairability | - | Average (2.74/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Very good (B) Β· 208 drops |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (98th and 61st place)
Android Tablet Ranking (73rd and 44th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 2900 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A73 |
- 3 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Adreno 732 |
| GPU shading units | 128 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 950 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~243.2 GFLOPS | ~1459.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 387 | 8926 |
| Single-core score | 484 | 1843 |
| Multi-core score | 1558 | 4978 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 200538 | 552288 |
| GPU | 29602 | 419835 |
| Memory | 114287 | 290516 |
| UX | 138620 | 434805 |
| Total score | 511632 | 1697444 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [18 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 98% |
| Graphics test | - | 7 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 967 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-07-04 (NiK0nvs) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 484 / 1558 |
Xiaomi Pad 7
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-29 (SmokerPH) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 9571 |
| π 2026-08-29 (SmokerPH) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1884 / 5226 |
| π 2026-07-05 (Aditay) | AnTuTu 11 | 1672445 |
| π 2026-07-04 (Samarth Kawade) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1918 / 5161 |
| π 2026-07-04 (Samarth Kawade) | AnTuTu 11 | 1776424 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | No |
| Memory card max size | Up to 2048 GB | - |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| ROM | - | HyperOS 2.0 |
| OS size | - | 32 GB |
| OS updates | - | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 7600 mAh | 8850 mAh |
| Max charge power | 18 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Bypass charging | No | - |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 1:20 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1000 cycles |
| Web browsing | - | 10:46 hr |
| Watching video | - | 15:40 hr |
| Gaming | - | 07:07 hr |
| Standby | - | 128 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | No | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | - | Omnivision OV13B10 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | 1/3.06" (β 0.33 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.3 |
| Sensor | CMOS | Omnivision OV08D10 |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" (β 0.2 inch) | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | Yes |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | - |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | May 2026 | October 2024 |
| Release date | May 2026 | October 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | - | $299 |
| Successor | - | - Xiaomi Pad 8 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Accelerometer |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 18 W | Yes, 45 W |
Further details
Notes on Pad 7:
- The 128 GB variant features UFS 3.1 memory, other models have UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Pad 7 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1