Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 vs OnePlus Pad 3

57 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
VS
80 out of 100
OnePlus Pad 3

Here we compared two tablets: the 11-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 (with MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra) that was released on June 5, 2025, against the OnePlus Pad 3, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
  • Shows 77% longer battery life (31:12 vs 17:40 hours)
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 2048GB
  • Much smaller footprint: 30% more compact case (65.6 vs 94.1 square inches)
  • Weighs 165 grams less
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Pad 3
  • 5.8x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3317K versus 570K)
  • Has 3x more RAM: 12GB versus 4GB
  • Has a 2.2 inches larger screen size
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Comes with 3140 mAh larger battery capacity: 12140 vs 9000 mAh
  • Delivers 58% higher peak brightness (835 against 528 nits)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 18W)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Ability to record video in 4K resolution
  • Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • 15% higher pixel density (315 vs 274 PPI)

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 and OnePlus Pad 3 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
4 / 128 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
118.2
(Excellent)
Value Index
58.0
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Tablet:
vs

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 11 inches 13.2 inches
Resolution 1600 x 2560 pixels 2400 x 3392 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 7:5
PPI 274 ppi 315 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes
Max rated brightness 600 nits 900 nits
HDR support No Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 360 Hz -
Screen protection Tempered glass 60-144
Screen-to-body ratio 83% 87.6%
Display features - - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space 92.5% -
PWM 14999 Hz -
Response time 29 ms -
Contrast 1421:1 -
Screen space comparison
Pad 3
13.2″ (7:5 ratio) = 82.4 in2
Redmi Pad 2
11″ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
~51% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
528 nits
Pad 3 +58%
835 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 254.58 mm (10.02 inches) 289.61 mm (11.4 inches)
Width 166.04 mm (6.54 inches) 209.66 mm (8.25 inches)
Thickness 7.36 mm (0.29 inches) 5.97 mm (0.24 inches)
Weight 510 g (17.99 oz) 675 g (23.81 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Gray, Green, Purple Blue
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 423 cm2 (65.5 inches2) 607 cm2 (94.1 inches2)
Repairability Average (2.74/5) -
Drop resistance Good (C) · 156 drops -
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Pad 3 +6%
87.6%
Tablet Ranking (104th and 34th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (79th and 25th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 and OnePlus Pad 3
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 2200 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache - 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 6 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G57 MP2 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 64 1536
GPU clock 1000 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~128 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 and OnePlus Pad 3
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Pad 3 +314%
3003
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Pad 3 +370%
9307
Compute Score (GPU)
Pad 3 +1860%
24691
Compute Score (GPU) 1260 24691
Single-core score 725 3003
Multi-core score 1980 9307
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
570469
Pad 3 +482%
3317414
CPU 219481 1061523
GPU 48406 1152696
Memory 146071 369778
UX 156511 733417
Total score 570469 3317414
Samples [74 tests] [4 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
2544
Stability - 82%
Graphics test - 19 FPS
Graphics score - 2544
3DMark Solar Bay
11865
Graphics test - 45 FPS
Section 1 - 50 FPS
Section 2 - 46 FPS
Section 3 - 40 FPS
Graphics score - 11865
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Pad 3 +47%
14372
Web score 10522 13279
Video editing 5262 6340
Photo editing 17642 25239
Data manipulation 7941 15200
Writing score 11407 18634

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-04-24 (Mentos_uzbek)Battery lifeSOT 11:48 / 41:40
OnePlus Pad 3
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-09 (Harsh)AnTuTu3242325
📘 2026-07-10 (Даниил Oneplus Fan)AnTuTu3286274
📘 2026-06-20 (SusGo0d)AnTuTu3188009
📘 2026-04-03 -> Afera666AnTuTu3612786
📘 2026-03-30 (Shakeel)AnTuTu3317414

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 4 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 4.0
Memory card MicroSD No
Memory card max size Up to 2048 GB -

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15
ROM HyperOS 2.0 Oxygen OS 15
OS size 24 GB -
OS updates 0 years -

Battery

Capacity 9000 mAh 12140 mAh
Max charge power 18 W 80 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging - No
Fast charging Yes (17% in 30 min) Yes (40% in 30 min)
Full charging time 2:59 hr 1:29 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 08:38 hr 06:01 hr
Watching video 09:17 hr 12:27 hr
Gaming 06:30 hr 07:31 hr
Standby 233 hr 77 hr
General battery life
31:12 hr
17:40 hr

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 4128 x 3096
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash No LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No -
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 13 MP
Camera features - - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Sensor GalaxyCore GC08A3 -
Sensor size 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 5 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution - 3264 x 2448
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 17 mm -
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/5.0" (≈ 0.2 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization No Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo -
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 -
Type of SIM card Nano No
Multi SIM mode Standby -
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers 4.0 8.0
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos Yes -
Speakers test
Max loudness
86.3 dB
n/a

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced June 2025 June 2025
Release date June 2025 June 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $229 $649
Sensors - Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
Bundled charger Yes, 15 W Yes, 80 W
Further details
Notes on Redmi Pad 2:
    - Gyroscope, GPS and compass are only available on the 4G model.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the OnePlus Pad 3 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
2 (40%)
3 (60%)
Total votes: 5

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!