Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 vs Honor Pad X9
Here we compared two tablets: the 11-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 (with MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra) that was released on June 5, 2025, against the Honor Pad X9, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 and came out 2 years before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
- Comes with 1750 mAh larger battery capacity: 9000 vs 7250 mAh
- Shows 22% longer battery life (31:12 vs 25:36 hours)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 2048GB
- More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 13
- 24% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (570K versus 461K)
- Delivers 17% higher peak brightness (526 against 451 nits)
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- 35% higher pixel density (274 vs 203 PPI)
Reasons to consider the Honor Pad X9
- Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11 inches | 11.5 inches |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels | 1200 x 2000 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 5:3 |
| PPI | 274 ppi | 203 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83% | 84.1% |
| RGB color space | 92.5% | - |
| PWM | 14999 Hz | - |
| Response time | 29 ms | - |
| Contrast | 1421:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Pad X9
11.5″ (5:3 ratio) = 58.3 in2
Redmi Pad 2
11″ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
~7% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 254.58 mm (10.02 inches) | 267.3 mm (10.52 inches) |
| Width | 166.04 mm (6.54 inches) | 167.4 mm (6.59 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.36 mm (0.29 inches) | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 510 g (17.99 oz) | 499 g (17.6 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Green, Purple | Gray |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 423 cm2 (65.5 inches2) | 447 cm2 (69.3 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.74/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) · 156 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (106th and 130th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (81st and 102nd place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
- 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A73 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 128 |
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 1260 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS | ~322.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 1260 | 570 |
| Single-core score | 725 | 477 |
| Multi-core score | 1980 | 1551 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 219481 | 191663 |
| GPU | 48406 | 29731 |
| Memory | 146071 | 110054 |
| UX | 156511 | 129788 |
| Total score | 570469 | 461236 |
| Samples | [74 tests] | [37 tests] |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 10522 | 8739 |
| Video editing | 5262 | 4586 |
| Photo editing | 17642 | 15530 |
| Data manipulation | 7941 | 7170 |
| Writing score | 11407 | 8896 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-24 (Max) | AnTuTu 12 | 645861 |
| 📘 2026-09-12 (Maksik) | AnTuTu 12 | 634343 |
| 📘 2026-04-24 (Mentos_uzbek) | Battery life | SOT 11:48 / 41:40 |
Honor Pad X9
No benchmark results yet
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | No |
| Memory card max size | Up to 2048 GB | - |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 13 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | MagicOS 7.1 |
| OS size | 24 GB | - |
| OS updates | 0 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 9000 mAh | 7250 mAh |
| Max charge power | 18 W | 22.5 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | - | No |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (17% in 30 min) | Yes (34% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:59 hr | 2:04 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 08:38 hr | 08:56 hr |
| Watching video | 09:17 hr | 11:02 hr |
| Gaming | 06:30 hr | 07:03 hr |
| Standby | 233 hr | 155 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 2592 x 1944 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 5 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC08A3 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 2592 x 1944 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 17 mm | - |
| Sensor | CMOS | - |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" (≈ 0.2 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | - |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 6.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | June 2025 | July 2023 |
| Release date | June 2025 | July 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $230 |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
- Accelerometer |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 15 W | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Redmi Pad 2:
- Gyroscope, GPS and compass are only available on the 4G model.
Notes on Pad X9:
- The memory card slot is available only in the 4G model.
- In some European countries, the package includes a charger, while others do not.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 27