Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 vs Xiaomi Pad 7
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 11-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 (with MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra) that was released on June 5, 2025, against the Xiaomi Pad 7, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 and came out 8 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
- Shows 17% longer battery life (31:12 vs 26:39 hours)
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 2048GB
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7
- 3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1697K versus 570K)
- Higher display refresh rate β 144 Hz
- Has 2x more RAM: 8GB versus 4GB
- Delivers 55% higher peak brightness (813 against 526 nits)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 18W)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- 26% higher pixel density (344 vs 274 PPI)
- Has a built-in infrared port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11 inches | 11.2 inches |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels | 2136 x 3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 3:2 |
| PPI | 274 ppi | 344 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | - |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83% | 85.7% |
| Display features | - | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 92.5% | 97.3% |
| PWM | 14999 Hz | Not detected |
| Response time | 29 ms | 23 ms |
| Contrast | 1421:1 | 952:1 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 7
11.2β³ (3:2 ratio) = 57.9 in2
Redmi Pad 2
11β³ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
~6% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 254.58 mm (10.02 inches) | 251.22 mm (9.89 inches) |
| Width | 166.04 mm (6.54 inches) | 173.42 mm (6.83 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.36 mm (0.29 inches) | 6.18 mm (0.24 inches) |
| Weight | 510 g (17.99 oz) | 500 g (17.64 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Green, Purple | Black, Blue, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 423 cm2 (65.5 inches2) | 436 cm2 (67.5 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.74/5) | Average (2.74/5) |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) Β· 156 drops | Very good (B) Β· 208 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (106th and 62nd place)
Android Tablet Ranking (81st and 46th place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
- 3 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Adreno 732 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS | ~1459.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 1260 | 8926 |
| Single-core score | 725 | 1843 |
| Multi-core score | 1980 | 4978 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 219481 | 552288 |
| GPU | 48406 | 419835 |
| Memory | 146071 | 290516 |
| UX | 156511 | 434805 |
| Total score | 570469 | 1697444 |
| Samples | [74 tests] | [18 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 98% |
| Graphics test | - | 7 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 967 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 10522 | - |
| Video editing | 5262 | - |
| Photo editing | 17642 | - |
| Data manipulation | 7941 | - |
| Writing score | 11407 | - |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-24 (Max) | AnTuTu 12 | 645861 |
| π 2026-09-12 (Maksik) | AnTuTu 12 | 634343 |
| π 2026-04-24 (Mentos_uzbek) | Battery life | SOT 11:48 / 41:40 |
Xiaomi Pad 7
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-29 (SmokerPH) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 9571 |
| π 2026-08-29 (SmokerPH) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1884 / 5226 |
| π 2026-07-05 (Aditay) | AnTuTu 11 | 1672445 |
| π 2026-07-04 (Samarth Kawade) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1918 / 5161 |
| π 2026-07-04 (Samarth Kawade) | AnTuTu 11 | 1776424 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | No |
| Memory card max size | Up to 2048 GB | - |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | HyperOS 2.0 |
| OS size | 24 GB | 32 GB |
| OS updates | 0 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 9000 mAh | 8850 mAh |
| Max charge power | 18 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (17% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:59 hr | 1:20 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | 1000 cycles |
| Web browsing | 08:38 hr | 10:46 hr |
| Watching video | 09:17 hr | 15:40 hr |
| Gaming | 06:30 hr | 07:07 hr |
| Standby | 233 hr | 128 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | No | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC08A3 | Omnivision OV13B10 |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (β 0.25 inch) | 1/3.06" (β 0.33 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.3 |
| Focal length | 17 mm | - |
| Sensor | CMOS | Omnivision OV08D10 |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" (β 0.2 inch) | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | - |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | - |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | No |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | - |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | - |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | June 2025 | October 2024 |
| Release date | June 2025 | October 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $299 |
| Successor | - | - Xiaomi Pad 8 |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 15 W | Yes, 45 W |
Further details
Notes on Redmi Pad 2:
- Gyroscope, GPS and compass are only available on the 4G model.
Notes on Pad 7:
- The 128 GB variant features UFS 3.1 memory, other models have UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Pad 7 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 51