Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 vs Oppo Pad Neo
57
out of 100
VS
53
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 11-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 (with MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra) that was released on June 5, 2025, against the Oppo Pad Neo, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G99 and came out 1 year and 5 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
- Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 9000 vs 8000 mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 13
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- Much smaller footprint: 12% more compact case (65.6 vs 74.4 square inches)
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Oppo Pad Neo
- Has 50% more RAM: 6GB versus 4GB
- Supports higher wattage charging (33W versus 18W)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | LTPS LCD |
| Size | 11 inches | 11.4 inches |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels | 1720 x 2408 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 4:3 |
| PPI | 274 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83% | 83.9% |
| RGB color space | 92.5% | - |
| PWM | 14999 Hz | - |
| Response time | 29 ms | - |
| Contrast | 1421:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Pad Neo
11.4″ (4:3 ratio) = 62.4 in2
Redmi Pad 2
11″ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
~14% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 254.58 mm (10.02 inches) | 255.12 mm (10.04 inches) |
| Width | 166.04 mm (6.54 inches) | 188.04 mm (7.4 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.36 mm (0.29 inches) | 6.89 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 510 g (17.99 oz) | 538 g (18.98 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Green, Purple | Gray |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 423 cm2 (65.5 inches2) | 480 cm2 (74.3 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.74/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) · 156 drops | - |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (104th and 118th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (79th and 91st place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 64 |
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 1260 | 1364 |
| Single-core score | 725 | 714 |
| Multi-core score | 1980 | 1872 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 219481 | 250145 |
| GPU | 48406 | 43322 |
| Memory | 146071 | 116331 |
| UX | 156511 | 135748 |
| Total score | 570469 | 545546 |
| Samples | [74 tests] | [178 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Graphics test | - | 1 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 138 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 10522 | 7864 |
| Video editing | 5262 | 5221 |
| Photo editing | 17642 | 16373 |
| Data manipulation | 7941 | 7872 |
| Writing score | 11407 | 9249 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-04-24 (Mentos_uzbek) | Battery life | SOT 11:48 / 41:40 |
Oppo Pad Neo
No benchmark results yet
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 2048 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 13 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | ColorOS 13.2 |
| OS size | 24 GB | - |
| OS updates | 0 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 9000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 18 W | 33 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (17% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 50 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:59 hr | 2:00 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 08:38 hr | - |
| Watching video | 09:17 hr | - |
| Gaming | 06:30 hr | - |
| Standby | 233 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC08A3 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 17 mm | - |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" (≈ 0.2 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | - |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | June 2025 | January 2024 |
| Release date | June 2025 | January 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $260 |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
- Hall-effect sensor - Gyroscope - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 15 W | Yes, 33 W |
Further details
Notes on Redmi Pad 2:
- Gyroscope, GPS and compass are only available on the 4G model.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These tablets have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2. It has a better camera, gaming, battery life, software, design, and sound.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 4