Intel Core i9 13900KF vs i9 13900K

We compared two 24-core desktop CPUs: the 3.0 GHz Intel Core i9 13900KF against the 3.0 GHz i9 13900K. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click β€œCalculate".
Currency
VS
43.5
(Average)
Value Index
42.1
(Average)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 13900K and 13900KF
Advantages of Intel Core i9 13900K
  • Includes an integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics 770

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) - 673
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 8146
Cinebench Scores (34th and 35th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1590 MB/sec 1570 MB/sec
Clang compilation 195 Klines/sec 193.2 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 485.7 pages/sec 477 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 531.3 Mpixels/sec 560.7 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 296.4 pages/sec 301.8 pages/sec
Background blur 72.3 images/sec 75.8 images/sec
Photo processing 153.2 images/sec 162.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 44 Mpixels/sec 43.5 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 877 & 683 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 205.7 GOps/sec 206.4 GOps/sec
Floating point math 150 GOps/sec 150.5 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 223M Primes/sec 232M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 86.1M Strings/sec 86.9M Strings/sec
Data encryption 45.9 GBytes/sec 46.2 GBytes/sec
Data compression 780.9 MBytes/sec 785.8 MBytes/sec
Physics 2958 Frames/sec 3101 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 45.8B Matrices/sec 46B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 4726 & 12796 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
536.55

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 15.2 PPW 15.2 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 161.3 PPW 164 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 459.6 PPW 464.7 PPW
Blender / Watt 4.29 PPW 4.24 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core i9 13900KF
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-23 (mvlad)Cinebench 2024133 / 2158
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-26 (blayk11)Geekbench 6 CPU3068 / 19278
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-26 (blayk11)Cinebench 2024129 / 2089
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-03 -> mazdapride89Cinebench 2024125 / 1896
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-03 -> mazdapride89Geekbench 6 CPU3193 / 20791
Intel Core i9 13900K
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-11 (Nagambie)Cinebench 2026673 / 8146
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-09 (veshelya)Cinebench 2024133 / 941
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-23 (Rohit007)Cinebench 2024124 / 1906
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-09 (LieInMyEyes)Cinebench 2024126 / 1771
πŸ“˜ 2025-05-21 (Richh)Cinebench 2024122 / 1823

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i9 13900KF and i9 13900K

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released September 27, 2022 September 27, 2022
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Raptor Lake Raptor Lake
Model number i9-13900K i9-13900K
Integrated GPU No UHD Graphics 770
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
Successor - Intel Core i9 14900KF - Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel CPU rating (13th and 14th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 8
P-Threads 16 16
Base Frequency (P) 3.0 GHz 3.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.4 GHz 5.4 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 16 16
E-Threads 16 16
Base Frequency (E) 2.2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.3 GHz 4.3 GHz
Total
Total Cores 24 24
Total Threads 32 32
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 30x 30x
L1 Cache 80K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 36MB (shared) 36MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes

Package

Fabrication Process 10 nm 10 nm
TDP (PL1) 125 W 125 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 253 W 253 W
Socket LGA-1700 LGA-1700
Peak Temperature 100Β°C 100Β°C
Desktop CPU ranking (20th and 21st place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics - Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU Base Clock - 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock - 1650 MHz
Shading Units - 256
TMUs - 16
ROPs - 8
Execution Units - 32
TGP - 15 W
iGPU FLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-5600
- DDR4-3200
- DDR5-5600
- DDR4-3200
Max. Memory Size 192 GB 192 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 89.6 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support Yes Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core i9 13900KF official page Intel Core i9 13900K official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 20 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
508 (55.9%)
400 (44.1%)
Total votes: 908

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i9 13900K or i9 13900KF?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
eden January 7, 2023 at 06:11 AM
The only reason to choose the i9 13900k is if you don't have a graphics card otherwise you are just spending more money for something you will not need (integrated graphics)
+68 Reply
Avatar
Jack January 4, 2024 at 09:27 AM
That is not the only reason, i have a dedicated Nvidia but still use the integrated graphics card in addition to the nvidia in order to support two more monitors up to six without needing another external GPU, because graphic throughput is not critical in my use case. Only need the nvidia RTX for IA and to support multiple monitors for productivity. Not everybody is a gamer but thanks to gamers we still have access to quality hardware without being a niche thing.
0 Reply
Avatar
jim November 9, 2022 at 11:57 PM
i9 13900KF maybe $30.00 cheaper & 2% faster in certain situations, but I would sacrifice that for the onboard video, (in case my video card dies), and the ECC support. I mean really... at the cost of this chip, you're worried about $30.00?
+56 Reply
Avatar
Gunther November 14, 2022 at 06:01 PM
I prefer as less unnecessary technology as possible on the CPU and mainboard. There was a time when we could decide to purchase mainboards that did not have onboard sound, etc. This is to avoid any conflicts or unneeded usage of resources and one less thing to worry about that could malfunction. So it is not about the price but rather being more in control of what I require in my builds.
+26 Reply
Avatar
Daniel November 28, 2022 at 12:21 PM
30 dollars? There's a 200 dollar difference in price at places like PC case gear where are you looking
+6 Reply
Avatar
Jim2 December 30, 2022 at 12:51 AM
It's a $500 difference.
+7 Reply
Avatar
Florin June 23, 2023 at 12:48 PM
Gunther, It is not unnecessary if you do video rendering and can use both GPUs. You get, depending on the external GPU, maybe up to 8-15-20% more performance (from what I could see) with also using the hardware acceleration on the intel GPU on the CPU.
+10 Reply
Avatar
Eric November 4, 2022 at 09:15 AM
i9 13900KF is cheaper and fits my preference for using an NVIDIA GPU configuration.
+126 Reply